UDWiki:Administration/Arbitration/Iscariot vs Seventythree

Administration Services — Protection. This page has been protected against editing. See the archive of recent actions or the Protections log.

Iscariot vs Seventythree

Over this case that he arbitrated. Seventythree deliberately closed the case with known falsehoods concerning myself and my actions. As this case will be archived I wish to respond to those accusations within the case itself. Even though I had requested the opportunity to respond, this was blatantly denied by Seventythree.

I will accept Karek or Jed. -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 17:38, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

I don't see a need Iscariot. With his depoarture from the wiki (and apperently the game), Happykook esentially threw up the white flag and surendered all points of contention to you. In whatever was being discussed in the case... You were right, Happykook was wrong. You won without the need for it to go any further. I do agree that a statement needsa to be added to the page to indicate why it was closed by Seventythree. Conndraka^{mod TDHPD CFT} 17:55, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

If it's seen as him surrendering, what is the harm in allowing me to respond? Happykook even got to respond to my request to post a rebuttal, I got nothing. I don't want to start a new case and post my response there, I don't want to create a page in my user space and put the response there either, I want to respond to the accusations against me in the appropriate place. -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 18:02, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

Honestly, it would make sense to let him respond to the things Happy said. Or remove them, and leave a small note saying what happened. Its a bit unfair to let one user say things about another user, and not give the other a chance to respond to them. 73, I'd consider opening the case to let Iscariot make his statement.-- dǝǝɥs oʇ ɯɐds: sʎɐʍ1ɐ! 18:46, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

Oh. I'm a bit surprised to be honest. I thought it was closed and sorted with HappyKook leaving, that's why I got it protected and was going to move it as soon as.... Sorry Iscarot, by all means reply to the comment. I'll unprotect it now. However, you could have always contacted me on my talkpage, rather than going through arbitration. I hope this is OK with you, and you don't feel the need to go through arbitration. Having said that, I will be happy with Karek, Jed or Suicidal angel as arbiter.--Seventythree^Talk 19:06, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

I requested 24 hours to post a rebuttal, went to work, came back and it was closed. I'll admit that the message I left on your talk page didn't explicitly ask for it to be unlocked, but I think it was implied. I have no wish to go through another arbitration case, however after my message did not elicit a response I felt it the only option, as soon as I have the option to respond I'd be happy to withdraw this case.

I'd note that half an hour after you said "I'll unprotect it now", it remains locked. Removed as reasoning explained below. -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 19:40, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

Well, you gotta remember, it's better form for a psyops to get another psyops to do a specific action instead of doing it themselves. If you look, he asked another sysops to unblock it for this situation, can you be a bit more patient?-- dǝǝɥs oʇ ɯɐds: sʎɐʍ1ɐ! 19:55, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

Didn't know that it was considered bad form for Seventythree to do it himself. I hereby retract the second part of that post. Thanks Suicidalangel. -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 19:59, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

No problem. Its also the reason why most sysops don't report and ban vandals at the same time. Unless its an active vandal. Then the gloves are off. Oh, and the thing is unprotected now. Have at it.-- dǝǝɥs oʇ ɯɐds: sʎɐʍ1ɐ! 20:07, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

Sorry I didn't notice the message, I gotta start archiving more often......--Seventythree^Talk 21:12, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

Edit made to page in question due to Seventythree requesting unprotection. There is, therefore, no longer an issue in contention. I no longer wish to continue this arbitration case and request it be dropped immediately. I'd like to thank Conndraka and Suicidalangel for their assistance. -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 21:36, 26 March 2008 (UTC)