UDWiki:Administration/Arbitration/Karek vs Sockem (2)

Administration Services — Protection. This page has been protected against editing. See the archive of recent actions or the Protections log.

WanYao vs. Omega/Sockem

I do not know if this is appropriate for an Arby case. If not, tell me and I will drop it.

After receiving this abusive comment on my User Talk page, I simply deleted it and replied with this. As you can see, I specifically asked Sockem to stay off my Talk page, and said I would do the same on his... and we would have no further contact with each other. As far as I was concerned, it was over. However, Sockem quckly posted this reply.

While I am aware that I can simply delete unwanted comments from my Talk page, I do not feel there is any reason I should have to put up with this shit, especially after specifically requesting for us to leave each other alone. I simply want Sockem to stop the drama and asshattery, and stay the fuck off my talk page. Simple. But if he can't do that.... that is why this is here. --WanYao 07:03, 19 November 2007 (UTC)

I simply responded to your comment and let you know my input on the matter. Omega 07:07, 19 November 2007 (UTC)

No. You escalated your asshattery and the drama-mongering attention-whoring. That was ALL your "reply" did, its sole purpose. If you weren't simply being a jackass, you would have just STAYED THE FUCK OFF MY TALK PAGE and not had to make another snide comment.... And THIS is why I have brought this case to Arby. --WanYao

07:12, 19 November 2007 (UTC)

No u acting like a fag mod started this look at me and nali and see where that gets ya. Omega 07:14, 19 November 2007 (UTC)

Oh... this all started because of this bull in the Talk:Suggestions page, Buster Sword discussion... Because I called Sockem AND the suggestor on their immaturity and asshatting and told them to stop. --WanYao 07:07, 19 November 2007 (UTC)

I'll arbitrate, if you like. --Cyberbob ^{DORIS CGR U!} 07:20, 19 November 2007 (UTC)

I have no objection. Omega 07:21, 19 November 2007 (UTC)

No objection... And I don't think I have anything to add to my "case" as a statement, other than what I already stated above... and Sockem's own replies which, IMO, speak volumes. Thanks.

Yeah pretty much my whole case is my first reply. Omega 07:26, 19 November 2007 (UTC)

Right then. Sockem, don't post on WanYao's talk page. WanYao, don't post on Sockem's talk page. Additionally, any further arguing between you two (I'm not so draconian as to restrict all contact) for the next 2 weeks will be considered vandalism. After this period is over, you may choose to lift the talk page restrictions if you see fit. Done. --Cyberbob ^{DORIS CGR U!} 07:39, 19 November 2007 (UTC)