UDWiki:Administration/De-Escalations/Archive/2010
De-Escalation Archive | ||||||
|
De-Escalation Queue
Pending De-Escalations
There are currently no pending de-escalation requests in the queue.
Recent Actions
Thadeous Oakley (2)
De-escalate me plz. Thanks in advance! --Thadeous Oakley 22:24, 8 April 2010 (BST)
- Processed. —Aichon— 05:51, 9 April 2010 (BST)
- Thanks again. Ya sure about re-arranging my record non-chronologically though? --Thadeous Oakley 07:08, 9 April 2010 (BST)
- They're sorted so that the ones that have been struck are listed together, that way it's easier to see where you are in the escalation process. I believe it's standard for A/VD, though I may be mistaken since I'm new around here. See these entries for other examples: User:Imthatguy, User:Iscariot, User:Sexylegsread. —Aichon— 08:38, 9 April 2010 (BST)
- Quoting mine isn't the way to go as it's so wrong it's comical. Persistent sysop incompetence has rendered mine this way. A/VD records should be in chronological order as they are an historical list of escalations of each user. Sysops are expected to be competent enough to be able to read a user's entry completely and understand the applicable policies rather than having every entry made idiot-proof. -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 12:27, 9 April 2010 (BST)
- They're sorted so that the ones that have been struck are listed together, that way it's easier to see where you are in the escalation process. I believe it's standard for A/VD, though I may be mistaken since I'm new around here. See these entries for other examples: User:Imthatguy, User:Iscariot, User:Sexylegsread. —Aichon— 08:38, 9 April 2010 (BST)
- Thanks again. Ya sure about re-arranging my record non-chronologically though? --Thadeous Oakley 07:08, 9 April 2010 (BST)
User:DanceDanceRevolution (2)
Hey, here for one last piece of atonement for my naughties. I've made 250+ edits since my last A/DE request just below this one. While I'll admit I was actually struck two days later, it was rather casually agreed (somewhere) that the one month, now A/DE has been created, should start from when the user requests it (now it's officially lodged somewhere) rather than when a sysop gets to strike it, I always thought that was the fair way to go. I think it might be here, although I'm very tired and just shuffling around the wiki randomly at the moment so it might actually be more decisively written somewhere else.
Either way, I'll let the acting op decide. It'll probs take two days anyway ;D --
15:37, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
- A calender month between requests seems fair to me. Your last record has been...
EATEN |
User:DanceDanceRevolution
May I please have a striking on the ban I received in November 2009. My last infraction was 6th January and my edits are enough, etc. --
14:06, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
- Two day long bump. --
- You may have to try a sysop talk page.--Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 07:17, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
- Struck. Do I need to link to this request from the strike or something? Cyberbob Talk 07:49, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
04:19, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
Thadeous Oakley
- My contributions. 250 edits in the last month. You know the drill. --Thadeous Oakley 17:47, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
- Done, but please read the rules and add an A/VD link to make it a bit easier for us next time. --
- Will do. --Thadeous Oakley 10:00, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
23:42, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
User:Drawde
Rightio, since noones made use of this yet, I'll deflower this virgin Admin page. I'm more then ready to de-escalated, having made a crap load of shitty awesome edits to this wiki, and over a month has passed.
-- Adward 22:52, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
You're still about ten or fifteen edits off of the magic number. Go un-merge some grouped locations or categorise some stuff that's not categorised and come back in like an hour. 22:56, 15 January 2010 (UTC)