UDWiki:Administration/Demotions: Difference between revisions
Cyberbob240 (talk | contribs) |
|||
Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
:Leaving again? You know the drill, are you ''really sure?'' :P. {{User:Linkthewindow/Sig}} 10:25, 15 August 2009 (BST) | :Leaving again? You know the drill, are you ''really sure?'' :P. {{User:Linkthewindow/Sig}} 10:25, 15 August 2009 (BST) | ||
:Noooo... {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 12:35, 15 August 2009 (BST) | :Noooo... {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 12:35, 15 August 2009 (BST) | ||
:I don't geddit. {{User:Rorybob/Sig}}18:23, 15 August 2009 (BST) | |||
==Recent Actions== | ==Recent Actions== |
Revision as of 17:23, 15 August 2009
This page is for system operators to request a demotion of status, or for enaction of demotion due to long-term inactivity. The act of demotion is restricted to those with bureaucrat status, and as such system operators will need to request their demotion here.
Guidelines for Demotion Requests
Request
System operators who wish to request demotion must consider these things before applying.
- Reason for demotion - As demotions cannot be reversed unless the user goes through promotions page again, the user is asked to make sure that they are making the correct decision when applying for demotion.
After a system operator has submitted his or her demotion request, the active Bureaucrats will review it, and after reaching a unanimous decision, choose to either demote the system operator deny his or her request. After action has been taken, the request will be moved to the archive.
Inactivity
main article: Policy Text
- A sysop that hasn't made any edit in four months will be warned, on their talk page, by a Bureaucrat, that they face demotion of their sysop powers in one week, if they remain inactive.
- One week after the warning has been placed, dependant on the actions of the sysop, the Bureaucrat will decide whether or not to carry out the demotion.
- This is to avoid, for example, the unlikely case of a sysop simply making a single edit with the aim of avoiding the demotion.
- The Bureaucrat is trusted and bound to make a fair decision, and not to demote a sysop who clearly demonstrates a return to activity on the wiki.
- Any demonstrable abuse of this power by a Bureaucrat, however unlikely, could (as with any other abuse of specific powers) be grounds for a Misconduct case.
- If the sysop makes no response at all to the warnings, they must be demoted.
Requests for demotion still needing to be processed
Rosslessness
Look. --RosslessnessWant a Location Image? 09:56, 15 August 2009 (BST)
- But why? You're good for us, Ross. --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 10:18, 15 August 2009 (BST)
- Leaving again? You know the drill, are you really sure? :P. Linkthewindow Talk 10:25, 15 August 2009 (BST)
- Noooo... Cyberbob Talk 12:35, 15 August 2009 (BST)
- I don't geddit. --RahrahCome join the #party!18:23, 15 August 2009 (BST)
Recent Actions
Older actions can be found in the archive.
Sysop Activity Check
08:02, 5 August 2009 (BST)
- Total Sysops: 13 (excluding Kevan and Urbandead)
User | Position | Last Update |
---|---|---|
Kevan | Bureaucrat, Sysop | immune |
Urbandead | Bureaucrat, Sysop | immune |
Linkthewindow (Contribs) | Bureaucrat, Sysop | 2009-08-05 |
Suicidalangel (Contribs) | Bureaucrat, Sysop | 2009-08-05 |
Boxy (Contribs) | Sysop | 2009-08-05 |
Conndraka (Contribs) | Sysop | 2009-08-05 |
Cyberbob240 (Contribs) | Sysop | 2009-08-05 |
DanceDanceRevolution (Contribs) | Sysop | 2009-08-05 |
Daranz (Contribs) | Sysop | 2009-07-05 |
Krazy Monkey (Contribs) | Sysop | 2009-08-05 |
Nubis (Contribs) | Sysop | 2009-08-04 |
Rosslessness (Contribs) | Sysop | 2009-08-04 |
Swiers (Contribs) | Sysop | 2009-04-28 |
The General (Contribs) | Sysop | 2009-08-02 |
The Rooster (Contribs) | Sysop | 2009-08-05 |