User talk:Chief Seagull

Welcome to our Wiki

-- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 06:25, 14 October 2009 (BST)

Keep seeing you around, but never said hi

As the header says, I seem to keep bumping into you, but haven't ever talked to you, so I thought I would. I know I've seen you around with MOB stuff, and then around the wiki in various places, and now you responded to the GSM request for Soldiers of Crossman, which is a group I'm an officer in. Lots of coincidental sightings of you, so I figured I'd just stop in, say hi, and see where else I might know you from, that way I don't keep being surprised whenever I see you. ;) —Aichon— 16:52, 26 January 2010 (UTC)

Your edit

Please don't remove edits from other people without a good reason. Older news shouldn't be removed, only archived, for they have historical value. For a location page guideline, please refer to this article. Thank you. -- Kittithaj 09:53, 31 January 2010 (UTC)

Sandbox

Looking good, but remember you can create your own version of the group box, change the colours and stuff. Heres an example. Template:MMGroupbox --Rosslessness^{Want a Location Image?} 17:20, 3 March 2010 (UTC)

Thank god for that - teal and red really don't go together at all! Thanks for the heads up. Chief Seagull talk 22:19, 3 March 2010 (UTC)

Judgewood Vector Control/Recruit

Orphaned Page

The following page(s) were orphaned, meaning they weren't linked from any other page on UDWiki. For house-keeping's sake, we are adding the link onto the relevant talk page. If you don't want the pages anymore just post them on the Deletions Page. You aren't required to do anything, but we'd appreciate if it you kept the link on any one of your pages. Please note that the link provided below will not remove the page from Orphaned Pages, so you'll still need to manually make a link for us. Thank you.

--Yonnua Koponen ^{Talk ! Contribs} 17:30, 8 March 2010 (UTC)

Admin Pages

Only sysops get to vote on vandal and misconduct cases. People have been reported to vandal banning themselves before for impersonating sysops and voting on these cases. Don't do it again. -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 00:00, 16 March 2010 (UTC)

Say please!... Nah just kidding - my bad, it was an honest mistake. Just one question though - although we can't vote on them, is it still okay for us plebs to comment on these cases? Chief Seagull talk 09:51, 16 March 2010 (UTC)

Yes, but talk pages. Admin pages have them for this very purpose. (Apart from for Misconduct, I think where we can all comment on the actual case, maybe.)--Rosslessness^{Want a Location Image?} 10:10, 16 March 2010 (UTC)

What he said. The simple rule of thumb is if you have to ask if you can comment on a case or not, you should be putting your comment on the talk page. -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 20:44, 16 March 2010 (UTC)

Judgewood Barricade Plan

The plan has been re-reviewed, and deemed compliant. You can view the evaluation here. --Maverick ^{Talk - OBR 404} 09:37, 21 May 2010 (BST)

Nice one, thanks! Chief Seagull squawk ^{grown-ups agree with Nick} 12:42, 21 May 2010 (BST)