User talk:Winman1/Why zombies have an advantage: Difference between revisions

From The Urban Dead Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 9: Line 9:
=idiot=
=idiot=
--{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|SlateBlue|SlateGrey}}-- 05:48, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
--{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|SlateBlue|SlateGrey}}-- 05:48, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
:i fuckin' lol'd --{{User:Drawde/Sig}} 15:15, 6 December 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 15:15, 6 December 2009

Umm..what?

The "nerfs" were created for a reason. I think that the game has finally reached a balance where Zombie characters are on equal par with survivors. The only reason survivors can't hold a siege or a neighborhood all comes down to organization and coordination; zombies have it survivors don't. Point me to one active survivor group these days that can commit to an operation and be successful. Please. I haven't seen one in a while. I think now that survivors have to work to play in this game they feel threatened: they no longer have the clear strategic advantage. Zombie groups, having been underdogs for so long, have developed superior strategies to compensate for the past discrepancy in zombie/survivor power. Survivors just don't have the edge in strategy anymore, nor do they have the confidence or leaders of yore. I play survivor and zombie characters simultaneously, the zombies are much more fun to play NOT because they have an unfair advantage but because presently survivors are in a sort of dark age without the same level of group cooperation that we had when groups like the DHPD and C4NT were at their peaks, (honestly, they're just shadows of themselves now). Until Survivors learn to be smart, zombies are going to do better. The suburb page will tell you that Zombies are controlling much more territory than they really ever did, aside from certain periods. I welcome it, it's more appropriate for the genre and it may spur some survivor creativity--though we may have to wait a while. Honestly, I think your ideas aren't really very well thought out and you should try and formulate your points more clearly; right now I can't point to anything valid, and your jumbled thought process makes it impossible to even begin to grasp what points your trying to make. Furthermore, this is not a guide. It isn't. It's an opinion piece. What does this guide people to do, whine? Yeah. Not a guide and not very good at all, I don't see how anyone could see it any differently.

Sorry, just the truth. -Lord Hawthorne 05:30, 6 December 2009 (UTC)

you

are

an

idiot

--DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 05:48, 6 December 2009 (UTC)

i fuckin' lol'd -- Adward  15:15, 6 December 2009 (UTC)