Suggestion talk:20070608 Malton's religion diversity

1. Kill - What does this have to do with anything? The buildings are in place now and in any well sized american or british town the likelyness of finding a noncatholic/christian church is extremely low. Just assume Malton either didn't have any or the portion of malton closed off didn't have any. Problem solved.--karek 10:27, 8 June 2007 (BST)

   Re - well, there ar a lot of changes like this in Peer reviewed so, I dont think that makes a valid point--♠ Che ♠-^{T GC X} 10:34, 8 June 2007 (BST)

   Re - Oh yay, the peer reviewed argument. A lot of crap gets into peer reviewed, some good some bad. Just because it's in peer reviewed doesn't means it stands a snowballs chance in hell of getting into the game. And recent comments by Kevan make the fact that this will probably never happen quite clear.--karek 11:16, 8 June 2007 (BST)

   Re - Well, aparently quoting kevan is just like quoting the bible :P, you can prove anything you want look: A new Malton (and in fact the part you quoted has a lots off maybes and probably, and should, so I dont see it soo clear as you do--♠ Che ♠-^{T GC X} 15:01, 8 June 2007 (BST)

   That has nothing to do with changing building names(this would require renaming churches to mosques, etc.). It was about changing building descriptions and the stuff you find in them, yeah he mentioned renaming things, he also mentioned the problems it would cause which is a perfect reason why this should be killed. Your point still kinda sucks and all this would do is change something that has been perfectly fine for something like 2 years now with no real reason other than necklaces and PC. As I said before there aren't any reasons why this should be done and your argument is very lacking. And if you want to continue this any further I suggest moving it to the talk page. P.s. Vista, even if he is that doesn't change my vote, I still think it is a horrible idea with more problems than it's worth. --karek 15:12, 8 June 2007 (BST)

   Your own qoute was about changing building names, but apparently you are as stubern as I am, so I see no point in moving it to the talk page, since it would be a waste of both your time and mine--♠ Che ♠-^{T GC X} 15:25, 8 June 2007 (BST)