Suggestion talk:20071008 Prevent Free Running from Ruined Buildings
God, I knew it. Anything that makes the game actually harder for survivors gets dogpiled immediately. --Slicer 05:29, 8 October 2007 (BST)
- As does anything that completely fucks over zombies -- boxy • talk • 06:38 8 October 2007 (BST)
- While it would make the game more interesting for survivors it definitely wouldn't make it hard for them in any real sense, forcing more people into less squares means better survivor defenses and more lasting barricades. Oh, and it removes large portions of the map from being useful to a whole 70% of the game which is just dumb.--Karekmaps?! 09:51, 8 October 2007 (BST)
I'm really not against anti-survivor suggestions being that I have a zombie/PKer alt myself, its just this would hurt the survivor population too much. By simply ruining the closest EP, a survivor would find it incredibly hard to find another building to enter, especially if the suburb is in a state of panic from an arriving zombie horde. Think you can convince people to drop the barricades of another neighbouring building? Good luck. All that AP spent crowbaring and searching for an EP could have been spent barricading the sieged building, removing zombies and reviving. Just no.-- AHLGTG THE END IS NIGH! 01:30, 9 October 2007 (BST)