Talk:Judgewood Barricade Plan

December 2009 Updates

With the threat to Necrotech facilities posed by Extinction and other salt the land believers we should strive to keep NT buildings at EHB. Yes this will keep alot of level 1 characters out, but seeing as they cant even use a syringe yet IMO that means they really wont be doing anything useful in there anyways. One more level and they can get free running then its a moot issue.

To support Perceval and central Judgewood longer in times of seige Brentnall Grove PD and St. Wilfrid's Hospital should also be EHB.

Edmund General Hospital should also be at EHB to support the Ludlow building.

Maria General Hospital as a hospital slightly further from the Necrotech buildings and thus not directly supporting them in times of emergency can remain at VSB so that those without free running can supply on FAKS.PvtDeLaGarza 08:23, 7 December 2009 (UTC)

Perceval NT & Surrounding Block

This area (from [14,11] to [16,12]) is generally EHB, except for the Library [15,11], which has been agreed-upon as an entry point and kept at VSB. I'm merely noting this down, as it's really not disputed by anyone. There are no decadings or 'cade wars over what these buildings should be by the residents. --William ^talk 22:02, 12 August 2009 (BST)

Could we make this compliant?

(I posted this on the JVC forum a few days ago)

I've just been looking at Judgewood's barricade plan which is labelled "This barricade plan is not compliant with the Uniform Barricading Policy. This plan was last reviewed on October 10, 2009." The comment made is "Too many VSBs, and they are clumped together in such a manner as to almost constantly threaten Free Running lanes."

Looking at the plan, I can probably see a few changes which could be made:

• In the SW corner, there's no need to have both the Halliday Building and Horn Drive School at VSB - one of these could be toughened up, or maybe even both as there are two entry points nearby in Chudleyton.
• As it's rarely threatened by zeds, the Peet Building could probably be downgraded to VSB to allow low-level NT's to grab some needles (we have 3 NTs so we could safely downgrade one without really threatening our work here). We could then raise St Baz to EHB.
• Ludlow has two neighbouring buildings (Veresmith School and the Critchell Building) as entry points. There are also 3 railway stations nearby at VSB. One idea is that we could raise Cridge Alley Station to EHB as this would keep that free-running lane more secure, and also raise Veresmith School to EHB, keeping Critchell as the entry point.
• Up north, there are two VSBs next to each other. Do we need both Colglough Library and Hebdon Meseum as entry points? I'd recommend raising one of these to EHB (probably be better to keep Colglough as an entry point).
• On the west side, We could raise St Arnold's Church to EHB as just two blocks away in Roywood we have Club Santler acting as an entry point for the Pilling Building.

Any thoughts? Perhaps make one of the dark buildings VSB?

--Chief Seagull (talk) 10:23, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

I've been living in SW Judgewood/NW Chudleyton for a while, and I agree that the Halliday Building and Horn Drive School should be EHB. By local custom (such as it is) the Osbaldeston Building has been an entry point, allowing an outside route between the factory 10,20 and the TRPs in SE Roywood.

The 5-block island containing the Peet building is frequently overbarricaded. Having Peet at VSB would be a good idea if it were enforceable, but having it marked VSB when in reality it will often be HB+ will lure people outside and into danger. If there was a large group along the Judgewood/Chudleyton border this wouldn't be such a problem, but there dooesn't seem to be one interested in that island. Garum 11:14, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

I tend to hang around in Peet with around ten others, and what you say is usually true - Lockwood Crescent School (Chudleyton) is nearly always overcaded, although St Baz is usually kept VSB (I've had to lower it myself a couple of times). As far Osbald is concerned, I'll go ahead and change that area. Chief Seagull (talk) 12:14, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

I might suggest making the Organ Arms VSB, since part of the UBP is that for any 3x3 section of the suburb, there should be at least one VSB building, and there aren't any VSB in the 3x4 section from Alaway Row to St. Josephine's. Organ Arms would fix that for you nicely. Otherwise, I like the way it's been changed to look now. —Aichon— 14:16, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

Seems like a good idea - even if the Arms was ruined, it wouldn't really threaten the free-running lane. Question is, would we have this at VSB as well as Cridge Alley Station, or instead of it? Personally I would prefer to up Cridge Alley to EHB in order to keep that lane secure, but that would leave another 3x3 block without an entry point (this could be fixed by using Burcham Bank and Gibbins as secure entry points, which I think would work better than Critchell). While we're on the subject, upping St Arnolds to EHB would also leave another large block without an entry point and it's a secure point anyway so I've struck that suggestion. Chief Seagull (talk) 15:50, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

I like both of those suggestions. Burcham instead of Cridge works nicely, and I really like Gibbens instead of Critchell. —Aichon— 18:09, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

OK, I've made those changes. Final question for today: Hebdon Museum - VSB or EHB? Chief Seagull (talk) 20:54, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

I'd say EHB, personally. No sense in having it right next to another VSB, and it's along some useful lanes, so having it higher is good. Don't forget to resubmit the application for UBP approval once you make the final changes. —Aichon— 22:17, 8 January 2010 (UTC)