UDWiki talk:Administration/Arbitration/Amazing vs Various

Amazing vs. Amazing

Who will win this epic battle? Also Amazing #1 has sued Amazing #2 for infringing on the Amazing copyright--Mpaturet 23:24, 19 April 2006 (BST)

• Please, Mpaturet, This is an arbitration page, This does not belong here. If you want to make a case, put it in your own name. This is simply irrelevant. If you wish to be asinine,keep it to your own page. And by the way, harrassment is not covered under freedom of speech nor does freedom of speech apply here. You'd be better off arguing something else. --Prosperina 21:22 19 April 2006.

Amazing wanted me to remove some stuff from my user page. Freedom of speech --Mpaturet 23:24, 19 April 2006 (BST)

No, Freedom of speech is a constitutional amendment in the US constitution. That doesn't apply here. This is an internet forum. And I was referring to your addition of the amazing vs amazing section. It is irrelevant so you should remove it as it has no place here and it only serves to bait the arbitration further into flame war. --Prosperina 23:33 19 April 2006

Please Maturet, stop making light of the very serious, and non trivial method of decition making that is the arbitration page. your paltry attempts at humor only turn this page into a circus of insanity, obfuscating it's true purpose, which is to give justice to individuals who have been wronged or defamed. Please try take the arbitration page more seriously, like I do--Bermudez 23:31, 19 April 2006 (BST)

Sorry, i find all of this really hilarious.--Denzel Washington 23:33, 19 April 2006 (BST)

I say old chap! Does this mean we're not up for tea and biscuits on Tuesday?--Mpaturet 23:36, 19 April 2006 (BST) Also for Denzel: Flaming Trolls: Serious Business

I'm sorry, the and biscuits won't work for tuesday, to many crumbs in the keyboard while watching my favorite pet lama--Bermudez 23:39, 19 April 2006 (BST)

Damned! Also I'm assuming that by your spelling you mean the Dalai Lama, and not the drama llama--Mpaturet 23:43, 19 April 2006 (BST)

You do realize that this makes you a troll, right? And thus, lends credibility to his case against you.Prosperina 23:49 19 April 2006

Hay. Please take life 50% less seriously and then we'll talk--Mpaturet 23:48, 19 April 2006 (BST)

Being jokey is not the same as living under a bridge and eating billy goats/children. News flash: Zerger is out, Troll is in. There is really very little difference between the Dalai Lama and the Drama Llama, This is getting out of hand take it to the talk page please.

Perhaps later, but not at someone else's expense. As requested, I'm taking the liberty of moving this to the talk page. Prosperina 23:55 19 April 2006 (BST)

I think he meant take all further discussion to the talk page.--Mpaturet 00:01, 20 April 2006 (BST)

All these guys ever do is make me look better. -- Amazing 02:48, 20 April 2006 (BST)

Huh. "These guys" is a euphemism for booze. Learn something new every day, eh? - CthulhuFhtagn 02:52, 20 April 2006 (BST)

Attention

http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php/User:Prosperina/Proposal For all those involved in the present ongoing arbitration, I suggest that you please visit and consider my proposal for potential solution for the issues involved that seeks to address the interests of everyone involved. I especially ask that the arbiters of cases concerning Amazing visit this page and add their input. --Prosperina 3:24 24 April 2006

God Help Me I'll Volunteer

If any of the Parties Vrs Amazing wishes me to Arbitrate then I am available. Be aware that I value maturity when making decisions, and have been known to side against friends or with my opponents if it is the right thing to do. Conndraka 07:00, 20 April 2006 (BST)

Yesh, good luck, Conndraka. I'd volunteer, but I have a conflict of interests since I have advised Amazing. Bring a raincoat. Prosperina 7:21 20 April 2006 (BST)

Conndraka's level headed. Go ahead, it's OK over here.MaulMachine 21:22, 20 April 2006 (BST)

Bah

The Trolls have created a stunning amount of drivel here which, for the most part, is outright false or purposefully unrelated and meaningless.

They've done this with no intervention from the Moderators and Arbitrators here.

This whole debacle only serves to show what trolls these folks are, AS WELL AS the fact that the people 'in charge' in whatever respect only support them and refuse to do anything to stop them from outright spamming.

You guys are completely worthless.

I could link to the most compelling evidence (and have) and you would still do nothing, or at the most would say "You guys share the blame" when you should be banning the Hell out of the people ABUSING THIS SERVICE.

I'll say it again - Worthless.

You've built a haven of ridicule, harassment, abuse, and trolling. Congratulations. -- Amazing 04:18, 21 April 2006 (BST)

You were a fantastic mentor in teaching us all how to ridicule, harass, abuse, and troll, I would like to extend a hearty thanks -- we learned from the best! -- Rueful 04:46, 21 April 2006 (BST)

Nah, you appeared fully-formed and began attacking for no known (to anyone but you guys) reason. -- Amazing 05:04, 21 April 2006 (BST)

Damn, you're pathetic. Because your enormous, painfully disorganized, laughably vague laundry list of complaints against almost everyone who ever so much as gave you a dirty look failed to immediately win a decisive ruling 100% in your favor, THE SYSTEM HAS FAILED! All I really want to know is this: does this mean that you're actually going to drop this poor-ass excuse for a complaint and stop clogging up the wiki and embarrasing yourself further, or are you just whining for the sake of it? And if it's the second, then will someone please take this blatantly self-serving spam off this page and make Amazing hold his one-person pity party elsewhere? --Tehasskickars 08:36, 21 April 2006 (BST)

Amazing, it's really quite simple, there is a section for each user you named. If you actually link stuff in that section, and make a compelling case against each person, then I'm sure you will get a decision. but the arbitrators can't reach a decision untill you bring evidence. Since you were the one who started this arbitration, it is up to you to bring "the most compelling evidence" that you say you can link to up. It is not, as you seem to claim, the part of the people you are bring cases against to put forth the evidence that you seem to think is there that implicates them.--Bermudez 18:35, 21 April 2006 (BST)

Where's my bottle of No-Troll? -- Amazing 02:35, 22 April 2006 (BST)

It can not exist in the same room as you because it would cause an explosion so large, it would take out your whole state--Bermudez 02:37, 22 April 2006 (BST)

Yeah, because bottles explode when in the same room with what they're ment to repell. Good show. (oy to the vey) -- Amazing 02:42, 22 April 2006 (BST)

If you hate this wiki so much, go away. MaulMachine 02:56, 24 April 2006 (BST)

Hm. "Fuck off." just about says it all. -- Amazing 03:10, 24 April 2006 (BST)

And you call us trolls.MaulMachine 03:16, 24 April 2006 (BST)

Since you came here, flamed me, and I replied to your flaming, yes. Troll. -- Amazing 03:37, 24 April 2006 (BST)