UDWiki talk:Administration/Speedy Deletions/Archive/February-2007

Zombie Inc stay of execution request

I think the page is funny and still has value. The group is long defuct, and I only know of 3 players still active in any respect. Still, speedy deletion is a sad fate. Perhaps a bid for Historical Status? I did not want to nominate it myself, but if someone from the deletion team would do so I'd appreciate it greatly. If it gets a fair trial there, and still doesn't make it then delete away with my blessing. bbrraaiinnss 1450, 15 Feb. 2007 (GMT)

I've rejected the speedy deletion request, on the grounds of it being still valuable. I'd say you should put them up for historical.--The General ^{T Sys U! P! F!} 17:05, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

Crit 12 or Crit 7?

Ive been wondering about what deletion queue to use for groups that have disbanded and either wiped their page or replaced it with a message about their disbandedment. Do these pages fall under Crit 7 or Crit 12, and if it is a Crit 12 do we have to wait the month for the page to fall under the unedited timespan of the Crit 12 ruling or can it be label for a crit 12 speedy delete right away? Vantar 20:45, 24 February 2007 (UTC)

The way I've been interpreting it, if a group page falls under any of the other criterion, I do them straight off (without the wait), especially wiped by author pages, which fall under Crit 1. If there's simply a message saying the group has disbanded without affecting the page content, or specifically saying "delete this", then that's not really a (crit 7) deletion request in itself, so I figure we've got to wait until they qualify for Crit 12 -- boxy ^{T L ZS Nuts2U DA} 03:07, 26 February 2007 (UTC)