User talk:CYossarain

A-Team and S6

I'm in Stanbury Village and I never saw any other your people there. Are you sure you're there? Sonny Corleone ^WTF 05:36, 11 June 2006 (BST)

Ollie Barton, is my character in the area... I promise he is there right now. CYossarain 00:42, 11 June 2006 (EST)

Are both of the groups there or is it just you? Sonny Corleone ^WTF 15:55, 11 June 2006 (BST)

Now Sonny, you don't expect me to actually reveal my group's size and strength to the head of the opposing force in the area. CYossarain 11:02, 11 June 2006 (EST)

Not that. I'm trying to clean out wiki pages and I got a group that on my back because I removed them for inactivity. I don't like seeing a suburb page with 50 groups while only 2 are active. Is it just you or are there more people? Simple question. Sonny Corleone ^WTF 16:10, 11 June 2006 (BST)

Fair enough, yes both groups have active members in Stanbury Village. CYossarain 11:10, 11 June 2006 (EST)

Cool. I'll leave the groups up there then. Sonny Corleone ^WTF 16:42, 11 June 2006 (BST)

Danger Report

Because of the arbitration case no one but Conndraka is allowed to update the Danger Report of Stanbury Village so that it does not cause problems. Sorry. Sonny Corleone ^WTF 19:07, 1 July 2006 (BST)

Arbirtration case? CYossarain

http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php/Moderation/Arbitration/Archive#Sonny_Corleone_vs._Bonefiver Sonny Corleone ^WTF 19:14, 1 July 2006 (BST)

Sonny as I read it you and Bonefiver are not suppose to update the wiki page,you are suppose to go through Conndraka. This has no authority over my update, so I don't see a problem here. CYossarain18:28, 1 July 2006 (GMT)

Yes it is. Because it conflicts with my point of view. So to stop an argument I recommend getting a mod or an arbitrator to update it. Sonny Corleone ^WTF 19:34, 1 July 2006 (BST)

And one more thing. To be Moderate it needs less than 50 zombies. 56 if my math is correct. That was done with only 25 AP. There is still other parts of the suburb that I have not been to yet Sonny Corleone ^WTF 19:44, 1 July 2006 (BST)

Sonny there was no bias in the update, and your math is wrong since you do hit a double shot in there and you counted zombies standing at revive points, which brings my count to 51. Meaning that in that past hour a few more zombies wandered in, stood up, or spawned there. Further more the largest horde stands at 18, there are no hordes in the area beyond that size. I am sorry Sonny but I have to ask what have I stated that conflicted with your PoV about Stansbury Village? Barricades are up, there is not a single horde in the suburb larger than the horde of 18 at the NT building, and the number of zeds standing in the Village are low. Honestly I don't see why you have an issue with this? CYossarain 19:32, 1 July 2006 (GMT)

I see one building that has zombies in front that has been duped. That building, St Eusebius Church, has only one zombie out front. That would bring it to 55. There still is the rest of the suburb that I did not check. This also is not counting me, which would bring it back up to 56. Xoid, a moderator, just removed your news because he too agrees that it is false. A horde can be a bunch of zombies spread out or in one square. This means all over. If it was just one square then there would never be a suburb that's VeryDanger since you only find 150+ zombies in sieges and Stanstock. Sonny Corleone ^WTF 20:40, 1 July 2006 (BST)

Sonny I am just going to take this up with xoid, you are being highly unreasonable here. CYossarain 19:52, 1 July 2006 (GMT)

Highly unreasonable? Dude, I'm following the wiki rules. 50+ zombies in half of the suburb. That's all you need to know to classify it as Dangerous. If there was less than 50 then al lthe power to ya. I tried arguing about it being VeryDanger but after going through the suburb last month it was just shy of 150 by 10-15 zombies. So it had to be moved down to Danger. Sonny Corleone ^WTF 20:57, 1 July 2006 (BST)

Sonny you are counting 6 zombies at revive points, and 1 zombie twice putting your pictures at 49 hostile zeds. Last I checked 49 is under 50, on top of that the rest of the suburb is basically free of zombie activity. So yes I do consider your stance here to be unreasonable.CYossarain 20:19, 1 July 2006 (GMT)

Revive points do not count anymore towards taking away zombies from the list. Many hordes hide at revive points after attacks. 56 counting me, not the 1 dupe. There's still more on the other side of the suburb. I only did north and part of the west. Sonny Corleone ^WTF 21:25, 1 July 2006 (BST)

Thanks a bunch- and boy, do we have our share of casualties. We may be falling back to Nichols en masse. Yesterday, Ackland had 200ish survivors, today 70 remain. The rest are dead or scattered, so you'll have your hands full! Any idea how many revives you guys can provide? I don't think we're going to be able to make another stand at Nichols. We might be better off just trying to get our people back up and running and by then, Nichols will have already been passed over. --Ron Burgundy 20:04, 15 July 2006 (BST)

40 a day would be fantastic, and it'll grow exponentially as we revive ourown! We'll be there- and if there's anything I can do for you guys, just let me know. I'll tell the other Ackland folks to do the same, though most of them will probably fall back to Caiger. With them, we might just be able help you guys out at Nichols when the time comes. This is a big help, and it's when we really need it, so thanks a lot. --Ron Burgundy 22:33, 15 July 2006 (BST)

Looks like you guys are getting ready for the same thing that happened to us! 70+ zombies outside Nichols today. With numbers like that, I wouldn't spend too much time reviving, if I were you. We'll send what reinforcements we can, but I think I'll have to send the dead to Yagoton instead. Thanks again, though! --Ron Burgundy 19:19, 16 July 2006 (BST)

Sorry I didn't get back to you sooner, but yeah the hammer came down a lot quicker than we expected. Most of our guys have been revived, but with Roftwood being as it is, I think we will be disposed of anything useful outside of Stansbury Village for the next few days. If there is anything we can do when and if the C4NT makes more for Ackland let me know. I would also like to say that I see a few of my loud mouths, arguing with a few News Team members. I got them to stop, I want no kind of bad blood between C4NT and the S6.--CYossarain 02:38, 19 July 2006 (BST)