User talk:DangerReport/Havercroft
November 28th, 2011
Changed it to dangerous as many resource buildings including the mall have zombies in them.User:Fernley 18:12, 28 September 2011 (BST)
September 16th, 2010
Downgrading Havercroft to moderately dangerous. active zeds and break ins, but no 50+ hordes in the area. in fact. the survivors are actually coming back. thanks to a joint effort by a few groups.Nuerotoxic2213 12:14, 16 September 2010 (BST)
April 9th 2009
Sorry bowt the stuff up before --user:Alex1guy 09:21, 9th April 2009 (UTC)
July 27th
As per the wiki news, downgrading the danger level.--Labine50 MEMS | MHG 07:00, 28 July 2008 (BST)
March 2008
Updated from Very Dangerous to Dangerous. A reasonable number of resource buildings are up and running and the largest hordes are based at the revive points. --Dr Trickpick 13:07, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
September 07
Updated from Moderate to Safe. The area is zed-free, has a high survivor population, and good barricade levels, its streets as brightly lit as the North Pole during summer. Much of the suburb is controlled by the Crimson Clan.Kris Eikehaug Talk | The Clan 19:36, 26 September 2007 (BST)
Older
With the Shacknews Horde assaulting Ackland Mall, the area can no longer be considered Moderate, but the outcome of the battle is uncertain, so let's not call it Very Dangerous quite yet. Axons Amok 03:20, 16 October 2006 (BST)
30+ mob of zombies outside Crape Bank, have broken in. --Keith Drudgely 15:46, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
News reads very unsafe and I hear tell of organized hordes in the area. If 8 zombies organized a break in of a building, a resource one at that, the suburb should probably be yellow at the very least.--Karekmaps?! 21:38, 10 August 2007 (BST)