User talk:ExplodingFerret
| Welcome to the Wiki! |
|
Welcome! We're glad that you have decided to play Urban Dead and join the Urban Dead Wiki. Before you start editing, you might want to take a few tips.
Remember, it's up to us to be responsible wiki editors. |
Check Project Mentor, we got a wonderful Tutoring program, apply today!--Canuhearmenow Hunt! 00:57, 25 September 2006 (BST)
I'll have a look. Haven't really got around to reading docs and such yet. If anyone sees me making any mistakes in accepted practice or whatever please feel free to add them here. ExplodingFerret 01:08, 25 September 2006 (BST)
Message!
"Demonstration: A non-AGer who got HS has a 15 AP penalty and a non-AGer with no HS costs 5 AP to stand up" Non-AG zombies take 10ap to stand up. With headshot, 15AP. Just so you know --Gene Splicer 22:28, 26 October 2006 (BST)
- I should really think while typing... the numbers are wrong but the argument is still essentially right.--01:03, 27 October 2006 (BST)
I'd like to know why you're completely opposed to people healing slowly. There's no acceptable middle-ground to you between overpowered and worthless? --Jon Pyre
- It's a matter of choice -- the player could choose to spend all their time somewhere relatively safe and survive the occasional attack by regenerating, never needing to be healed, or they can live somewhere dangerous, where the skill would either have to be overpowered to kick in in time before someone FAKs or they get hit enough to die, or negligible. Many suggestions feel like this to me: there's no way to balance them to my mind, indicating that they fundamentally don't really fit in with (how I think) the game should be. --18:22, 13 November 2006 (UTC) ((PS: Blackmore and all of Ridleybank will be returned to us, the harman infection eradicated. BARHAR ZAMBAHZ. This message brought to you by my zed character.))
Thanks!
Thank you for voting on my suggestion. I thought it was a half way decent idea, but there's no way it will pass. Oh well.--Lachryma☭ 22:09, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
- Personally, I think you should give it another chance and resubmit it with the 75 XP cost instead of 50, and maybe add some reasoning to the bottom of the suggestion to discourage the sillier kill voters. It's pretty clear that people are being discouraged from playing zombies, and tackling this problem at the source by making new zombie characters more playable (without adding any advantage for when those zombies become high-level) seems like a very nice approach. --ExplodingFerret 22:26, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
- Oh, and the comic strips on your user page look neat. I shall look at them some time when I'm not busy going to bed. --ferret
That's not a bad idea. I'll probably take the new reasoning from your vote, if that's okay. And I hope you enjoy the comics when you do read them!--Lachryma☭ 22:33, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
Thank you for your vote! It's really appreciated! --JohnRubin 20:29, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
