User talk:Peralta: Difference between revisions
(→Thanks: new section) |
(→Demo18) |
||
(3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
Line 39: | Line 39: | ||
Thanks for the catch. They have two timestamps in their ad, so when I went searching for June timestamps, I found their older timestamp, didn't look closely enough to realize that it was from last year, and removed the ad, never noticing that they had another timestamp at the bottom that was up to date. {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 16:14, 17 August 2016 (UTC) | Thanks for the catch. They have two timestamps in their ad, so when I went searching for June timestamps, I found their older timestamp, didn't look closely enough to realize that it was from last year, and removed the ad, never noticing that they had another timestamp at the bottom that was up to date. {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 16:14, 17 August 2016 (UTC) | ||
:In fact, have a cookie. | |||
{{cookie|Aichon|Peralta|fixing Aichon's date gaffe with ads.}} | |||
:{{User:Aichon/Signature}} 16:27, 17 August 2016 (UTC) | |||
::Omnomnom, cookies! | |||
::In all seriousness, I noticed since I updated our group ads recently and remembered the KT timestamp. The double timestamp is an issue they probably should fix. Thanks for appreciating the very tiny effort I made! {{User:Peralta/Signature}} 07:12, 18 August 2016 (UTC) | |||
== Demo18 == | |||
This is my current view, with a somewhat compressed window: | |||
[[File:Demo18 scr.jpg|400px]] | |||
Does it make sense how the top-right navmap seems... squished? at least compared to similar ones on other suburb pages. {{User:Bob Moncrief/Sig}} 15:55, 25 August 2016 (UTC) | |||
:We tried to keep it the same size as the danger map so it looked balanced. I use Chrome, and it looks okay for me even with the line breaks in the suburb names. So I checked in Firefox (as that is what you use) and it is narrower in that browser. Maybe I screwed up the re-sizing somehow? I'll look at it later tonight. [[User:Stelar|stelar]] ([[User talk:Stelar|talk]]) 22:26, 25 August 2016 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 22:26, 25 August 2016
Clean slateI moved all of the content on this page to an archive (see the index above). Feel free to post any comments, questions or banter below. PB&J 11:02, 20 May 2016 (UTC) East Becktown cade planHey Johnny, just wanted to say, if you want to change around expected cade levels in East Becktown make sure to leave a message at Talk:East Becktown Barricade Plan in case anyone has objections. I wouldn't expect anyone to as East Becktown is UBP non-compliant, but given that most of the cade plans have been in operation for years, it's good to give people a heads up. And don't forget to edit the actual barricade plan a few days afterwards. Bob Moncrief EBD•W! 18:09, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
North Blythville Group ListingHey man, groups listed in Suburb group listings are required to have a wiki page. Is "The Scourge" The Undying Scourge? I've removed the listing in North Blythville for now, but if you make a wiki page for the group (or link it to one already existing), feel free to re-add it. Cheers! Bob Moncrief EBD•W! 15:12, 19 June 2016 (UTC)
East Becktown TRP boxFirefox weirdness when I shrink the page width: File:Shot c.jpg. Bob Moncrief EBD•W! 12:04, 12 July 2016 (UTC) ThanksThanks for the catch. They have two timestamps in their ad, so when I went searching for June timestamps, I found their older timestamp, didn't look closely enough to realize that it was from last year, and removed the ad, never noticing that they had another timestamp at the bottom that was up to date. —Aichon— 16:14, 17 August 2016 (UTC)
Demo18This is my current view, with a somewhat compressed window: Does it make sense how the top-right navmap seems... squished? at least compared to similar ones on other suburb pages. Bob Moncrief EBD•W! 15:55, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
|