User talk:Blue Command Vic: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
(15 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown) | |||
Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
==Questions== | ==Questions== | ||
== request== | |||
would i be able to get a status report on Younghusband Square Police Department? | |||
only if your in the area, dont go out of your way to check. its just that you updated the last time about 10 days or so. cheers [[User:Me101|Me101]] 03:59, 15 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
==Appreciation== | ==Appreciation== | ||
Line 21: | Line 26: | ||
==None of the above== | ==None of the above== | ||
===Hail Sai Vic=== | |||
Long days and pleasant nights, Sai Vic. -- {{User:BlackReaper/sig}} 02:23, 5 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
:I've been around almost a year now. I am a truly dedicated fan of the Tower. Yourself? -- {{User:BlackReaper/sig}} 02:28, 5 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
::Excellent. It is always good to meet another fan, as we seem too far and in-between. May I ask your favorite novel out of the series? -- {{User:BlackReaper/sig}} 02:30, 5 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
:::Both are excellent books [my favorites being The Gunslinger and The Dark Tower]. And Eddie was one of my favorites also. I am, however, obsessed with the Crimson King, and Roland Deschain. The depth of personality and the complexity associated with those 3 is intense [however, we won't even start on the ever changing personality of 'The Lady of Shadows', or Rolands original ka-tet]. The sub characters are even so indepth that they rival the main characters of other novels. I believe it was King's best work hands down. Many think that King rushed the ending, I disagree.. Your opinion perhaps? If I'm not interrupting you... -- {{User:BlackReaper/sig}} 02:40, 5 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
:::: *Applauds* I believe that you hit the meaning/theme right on the head. I entirely agree with your summary of what King had meant to tell his readers, 100%. It amazes me that somewhere in the world, for once someone has agreed with me on the theme behind a series. Your sir, I think are my new friend. -- {{User:BlackReaper/sig}} 02:54, 5 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
===Sig=== | |||
The Sup over sub appears to be too tall, but the side by side sig/redVrsBlue looks cool. is the split where RvB goes on the next line avoidable? It would be best if it was. [[User:Conndraka|Conndraka]]<sup>[[Moderation|mod]] [[User_talk:Conndraka|T]][[AZM]] [[Coalition for Fair Tactics|''CFT'']]</sup> 10:07, 6 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
It's now causing problems on the [[UDWiki:Administration/Vandal_Banning/Archive/2009_03#User:Alex1guy|VB Talk Page]], the timestamping is stuffed up. I've taken a look at the code, and I remember a problem with my sig a while back - I'll have a poke around. {{User:Linkthewindow/Sig}} 11:11, 6 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
:I've just [[User:Linkthewindow/Sandbox/5|played with the code on my page]] - I don't feel like becoming worm food - you can just copy/paste the code (minus my message, of course,) onto yours. {{User:Linkthewindow/Sig}} 11:17, 6 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
Try this: | |||
{{CodeInline|<nowiki><noinclude>{{User:Blue Command Vic/Navigation}}</noinclude><span style="border:2px dotted green; background-color:black">[[User:Blue Command Vic|<span style="color: white; background-color: darkred">{{c|darkred|_}}'''''Vic D'Amato'''''{{c|darkred|_}}</span>]][[Dead vs Blue|<span style= "color: white; background-color:darkblue">{{c|darkblue|_}}'''''Dead vs Blue'''''{{c|darkblue|_}}</span>]]</nowiki>'''<nowiki></span><noinclude></nowiki>'''<nowiki> | |||
---- | |||
Same rules here as the Navigation. Touch it, and you're worm food. </noinclude></nowiki>}} | |||
--{{User:Linkthewindow/Sig}} 11:38, 6 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
It appeared that the <nowiki><noinclude></nowiki> was on the next line with the one before - I simply moved it onto the same line as the rest of the sig. Donno how, but it worked <tt>:)</tt>. {{User:Linkthewindow/Sig}} 11:57, 6 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
If the noinclude tag is on the line below where the sig ends, a newline will get included in the template (The newline the exists after the sig ends, but before the noinclude tag begins, it's a sneaky bastard) and thus on every page you use it. Watch out for that because they are hard to spot. Further, you can clean up your code somewhat by doing this: | |||
<code><nowiki><noinclude>{{User:Blue Command Vic/Navigation}}</noinclude><span style="border:2px dotted green; background:black">[[User:Blue Command Vic|<span style="color:white; background:darkred"> '''''Vic D'Amato''''' </span>]] [[Dead vs Blue|<span style= "color:white; background:darkblue"> '''''Dead vs Blue''''' </span>]]</span><noinclude> | |||
---- | |||
Same rules here as the Navigation. Touch it, and you're worm food.</noinclude></nowiki></code> | |||
You'll have to get this by editing the page itself, because the non-breaking spaces still become spaces despite the nowiki tags. The non-breaking space I put between the two bits of your sig will show up a gap unfortunately, but I ''think'' it will also solve the problem where half of it breaks onto a newline sometimes. If not, or if you don't like it and can live with the break, just remove that one non-breaking space. {{User:The_Rooster/Sig}} 17:35, 6 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
==thanks== | |||
Hes been editing out all my edits to the wiki anyway...I posted the mall status 3 times and he reverted it and there was nohing wrong with it | |||
But yea i guess thats true | |||
Thanks --[[User:Officer tommy|Officer tommy]] 23:26, 9 March 2009 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 03:59, 15 March 2009
Wiki User | Talk Page (Archive) | Vic D'Amato | Vic's Journal | Zambah G Zaz | Templates | Sandbox | Sig | Navigation |
First things first...
- Please put all new comments at the BOTTOM of their respective section, with a third level heading (===Heading===) below the last comment of the section.
- Please sign all comments.
- If your comment garners a reply from me, I will post it here, and at your talk page. If you'd just like it here, let me know.
- I reserve the right to delete anything I want. It IS my talk page, after all...
- This page will be periodically archived. Last archive was made 00:12, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
- Oh, and don't forget...
Important Messages
Questions
request
would i be able to get a status report on Younghusband Square Police Department?
only if your in the area, dont go out of your way to check. its just that you updated the last time about 10 days or so. cheers Me101 03:59, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
Appreciation
Criticism
None of the above
Hail Sai Vic
Long days and pleasant nights, Sai Vic. -- THELORDGUNSLINGER 02:23, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
- I've been around almost a year now. I am a truly dedicated fan of the Tower. Yourself? -- THELORDGUNSLINGER 02:28, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
- Excellent. It is always good to meet another fan, as we seem too far and in-between. May I ask your favorite novel out of the series? -- THELORDGUNSLINGER 02:30, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
- Both are excellent books [my favorites being The Gunslinger and The Dark Tower]. And Eddie was one of my favorites also. I am, however, obsessed with the Crimson King, and Roland Deschain. The depth of personality and the complexity associated with those 3 is intense [however, we won't even start on the ever changing personality of 'The Lady of Shadows', or Rolands original ka-tet]. The sub characters are even so indepth that they rival the main characters of other novels. I believe it was King's best work hands down. Many think that King rushed the ending, I disagree.. Your opinion perhaps? If I'm not interrupting you... -- THELORDGUNSLINGER 02:40, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
- *Applauds* I believe that you hit the meaning/theme right on the head. I entirely agree with your summary of what King had meant to tell his readers, 100%. It amazes me that somewhere in the world, for once someone has agreed with me on the theme behind a series. Your sir, I think are my new friend. -- THELORDGUNSLINGER 02:54, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
- Both are excellent books [my favorites being The Gunslinger and The Dark Tower]. And Eddie was one of my favorites also. I am, however, obsessed with the Crimson King, and Roland Deschain. The depth of personality and the complexity associated with those 3 is intense [however, we won't even start on the ever changing personality of 'The Lady of Shadows', or Rolands original ka-tet]. The sub characters are even so indepth that they rival the main characters of other novels. I believe it was King's best work hands down. Many think that King rushed the ending, I disagree.. Your opinion perhaps? If I'm not interrupting you... -- THELORDGUNSLINGER 02:40, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
- Excellent. It is always good to meet another fan, as we seem too far and in-between. May I ask your favorite novel out of the series? -- THELORDGUNSLINGER 02:30, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
Sig
The Sup over sub appears to be too tall, but the side by side sig/redVrsBlue looks cool. is the split where RvB goes on the next line avoidable? It would be best if it was. Conndrakamod TAZM CFT 10:07, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
It's now causing problems on the VB Talk Page, the timestamping is stuffed up. I've taken a look at the code, and I remember a problem with my sig a while back - I'll have a poke around. Linkthewindow Talk 11:11, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
- I've just played with the code on my page - I don't feel like becoming worm food - you can just copy/paste the code (minus my message, of course,) onto yours. Linkthewindow Talk 11:17, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
Try this:
<noinclude>{{User:Blue Command Vic/Navigation}}</noinclude><span style="border:2px dotted green; background-color:black">[[User:Blue Command Vic|<span style="color: white; background-color: darkred">{{c|darkred|_}}'''''Vic D'Amato'''''{{c|darkred|_}}</span>]][[Dead vs Blue|<span style= "color: white; background-color:darkblue">{{c|darkblue|_}}'''''Dead vs Blue'''''{{c|darkblue|_}}</span>]]</span><noinclude> ---- Same rules here as the Navigation. Touch it, and you're worm food. </noinclude>
-- Linkthewindow Talk 11:38, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
It appeared that the <noinclude> was on the next line with the one before - I simply moved it onto the same line as the rest of the sig. Donno how, but it worked :). Linkthewindow Talk 11:57, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
If the noinclude tag is on the line below where the sig ends, a newline will get included in the template (The newline the exists after the sig ends, but before the noinclude tag begins, it's a sneaky bastard) and thus on every page you use it. Watch out for that because they are hard to spot. Further, you can clean up your code somewhat by doing this:
<noinclude>{{User:Blue Command Vic/Navigation}}</noinclude><span style="border:2px dotted green; background:black">[[User:Blue Command Vic|<span style="color:white; background:darkred"> '''''Vic D'Amato''''' </span>]] [[Dead vs Blue|<span style= "color:white; background:darkblue"> '''''Dead vs Blue''''' </span>]]</span><noinclude>
----
Same rules here as the Navigation. Touch it, and you're worm food.</noinclude>
You'll have to get this by editing the page itself, because the non-breaking spaces still become spaces despite the nowiki tags. The non-breaking space I put between the two bits of your sig will show up a gap unfortunately, but I think it will also solve the problem where half of it breaks onto a newline sometimes. If not, or if you don't like it and can live with the break, just remove that one non-breaking space. -- RoosterDragon 17:35, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
thanks
Hes been editing out all my edits to the wiki anyway...I posted the mall status 3 times and he reverted it and there was nohing wrong with it But yea i guess thats true Thanks --Officer tommy 23:26, 9 March 2009 (UTC)