User talk:Tyx94

BSing Space

There's one rule here, and one rule only- keep it civil and somewhat courteous. Apart from that, let loose all the witty banter you want.--Tyx94 17:02, 25 April 2010 (BST)

Rumor of war

Danger? Did you say the TDT is going into danger? Anything your friends the Earletown Rangers could help with? I will PM you on the forum--Belisarius17 17:22, 1 May 2010 (BST)

It'd be great to have you guys alongside us. I got your message, PMed back. We're going to need to keep this private, though. The element of surprise and all that.--Tyx94 22:06, 1 May 2010 (BST)

Very well, PM only. Looking forward to it!--Belisarius17 22:20, 1 May 2010 (BST)

TDT!! TDT!!! Not to brag, but we kind of kick ass right now. Oh, and we're psyched to have the Rangers aboard! Jesus Sante 23:05, 1 May 2010 (CST)

This be true. Very true, indeed.--Tyx94 16:26, 2 May 2010 (BST)

Wiki stuff

Hey Ty, This isn't witty, but I wanted to let you know that I modified the BAR (Allied) template that we have to read BAR (Member). If you want it, the code is on my user page. Waka waka waka. --Jesus Sante 21:42, 22 May 2010 (CST)

Oh no, that's really witty. I'm impressed. Looks good. But my pathetic wiki skills can't seem to get it to work for me. Could you post the code? Or if you'd rather, you could just stick it on my page where the X is. It makes no difference to me, whatever you prefer. But that's some good work right there. --Tyx94 06:22, 23 May 2010 (BST)

I dropped that template on your page like it was hot. Congrats on kicking ass on taking names in the HEH competition as well!--Jesus Sante 21:39, 21 June 2010 (CST)

I spose this is a little late, but thank ye kindly, Jesus. I apologize for that whole 'nail you to the cross' thing.--Tyx94 00:56, 7 July 2010 (BST)

You're forgiven, buddy (forgiveness is kind of my thing). Also, I made you that template for the 400th deadbeat kill! You can move it if you want to (obviously, it's your page). Jesus Sante ^CFT 18:42, 25 July 2010 (BST)

That's an awesome template, Jesus! You have my eternal gratitude. One of these days, I'm gonna have to get you to teach me how to update the Deadbeat list. Not gonna lie, that Photobucket converting confuses me.--Tyx94 00:44, 26 July 2010 (BST)

You're welcome, man. You earned it. Oh, and I'll send a tutorial your way some time. Jesus Sante ^CFT 03:25, 26 July 2010 (BST)

HEY!!

You got a wiki!? AWESOME, we can totally be like, wikibros. Yeah. Wait, you hate me, I forgot that part. Piss. Oh, I see I'm not worth mentioning in your diary, well I think I need to change that. See ya soon wikibro! William 12:35 pm, 28 May 2010

Oh, Willy, you goofball. Of course you're not in my journal (It's a journal, damnit, not a diary. Journals are much more manly). I only mention real threats in there. It's okay, easy mistake. I see how you got confused.--Tyx94 06:09, 29 May 2010 (BST)

Willy's in my diary. I don't know why you need to play so hard to get with him Ty. Jesus Sante 21:33, 21 June 2010 (CST)

Rolt Heights Danger Level

If you look at the edit history, you'll see that the danger level was updated by me since 10 May 2010. Rolt Heights was safe by then. I only updated it per External Military Reports, which are factual, non-biased information from the game creator Kevan himself.

Suburb Danger Level and EMRs are usually updated automatically with a bot run by The Rooster. Sometimes he's not available for many weeks, however. So if you are in the area, then it's a better idea to update the situation by your own. I only reported what I know at the moment and can't be held responsible for any changes that happened after that. -- Kittithaj 22:15, 3 July 2010 (BST)

Hey, that's no big deal at all. I was just curious as to why it was at safe, and that would explain it. My apologies then.--Tyx94 00:54, 7 July 2010 (BST)

Cool story bro

No really, I liked it, it was a tale that could melt the coldest heart. But, I don't really care. I might not be the greatest PKer yet, but I sure as hell am the most dedicated. So I asked for a little help from the zergs who were hanging out around Rolt anyway, who cares, you were on their list anyway. I just didn't want them eating me when I'm so close to killing Leo. As for you, I enjoy our little chats, but you've gotten a little, out of hand. See you soon, I'll be the one behind you, always behind you. Hahaahaha. William

Uhhhh.... that's a little scary, there. I'd prefer you don't hang around behind me. But if you're needing some lovin', the AV are a bunch of sex-crazed fiends. There's the whole 'decomposing bodies' thing to deal with, but you're a smart boy, right Willy? You'll figure out a way to make it work. Also, I'm not your brother.--Tyx94 01:31, 21 July 2010 (BST)

You can cut the sexual tension between you two with a knife. "I sure as hell am the most dedicated." Really? Yeah, and you might not be the greatest PKer yet. I wonder how this plays in Bill's head. It sounds like he thinks he's the real deal, while we all know that only the Pathetic part is real. Oh, and stay away from the Angry Vaginas! They're all mine! Jesus Sante ^CFT 03:24, 26 July 2010 (BST)

Umm, I'm kinda hoping you're wrong about that 'sexual tension' thing, Jesus. Besides, I've already got a lover! It's just wouldn't be right to mess around with Willy.--Tyx94 02:55, 27 July 2010 (BST)

Errr, Jesus? You scare me a little. Oh, and you shouldn't touch those angry vaginas, they've been around Malton...IF YOU KNOW WHAT I MEAN. And really, looking back at what I wrote, I'm probably being a bit, douchey, but I get a laugh out of it so I see no reason to stop. Anyway, seriousness aside, You are too my wikibro! And Jesus too. We're all wikibros! GROUP HIGH FIVE! LAter wikibros! William 11:55, 27 July 2010

Hey Bill, I stole your girlfriends. Proof. Jesus Sante ^CFT 03:46, 28 July 2010 (BST)

You are not a member of BCH

So keep your hands off anything to do with BCH.-DeWolf 16:39, 9 February 2011 (UTC)

Sorry, but there won't be anymore of this "We're a survivor group, but we PK people we don't like" crap. You want to be listed as a survivor group? Cool. Stop PKing DA members, and that'll be that. Until that point, get over it.--tyx94 04:08, 10 February 2011 (UTC)

Precedent points at groups having pretty much free reign on how they want to be listed on suburb listings. See also this discussion. Continue this edit warring, and I'll drag you personally to arbies to get your editing rights for that page revoked. -- Spiderzed▋ 04:16, 10 February 2011 (UTC)

If you'd like, go for it. Precedent says what you're listed as should be from a neutral point of view, and from that POV (i.e., not yours) BCH are most definitely a PKing, and thus, hostile group. And I'd put money on the arbies agreeing with me, and everyone else in the NE (Apart from you, of course. But you're biased, I'm afraid.), that you should indeed be listed as a hostile group. --tyx94 04:53, 10 February 2011 (UTC)

And I don't see any edit war occurring. I just fixed someone's mistake on the group listings.--tyx94 04:53, 10 February 2011 (UTC)

(Triple post!) And I really wouldn't be talking about screwing with someone's listing. Exactly how is the D.I.T.P.S a zombie group? I think I'll be letting them know that that's been happening.--tyx94 04:56, 10 February 2011 (UTC)

I should probably point out that the DIPTS thing is Deathwire trying to prove a point, not the BCH being sneaky. That said, I'm of the belief both parties are proof of something rotten in the system of classifying groups. ~ Red Hawk One ^{Talk | space for lease} 05:28, 10 February 2011 (UTC)

I volunteer to arbitrate. As you cited a discussion on my talk page, I'm clearly an expert in the matter, and I would rule fairly in the interest of promoting this wiki as a game resource.--Yonnua Koponen ^{Talk ! Contribs} 08:16, 10 February 2011 (UTC)

Thank you, RHO. I didn't know Deathwire was the one who did that. However, even though he's just trying to make a point, he still shouldn't be allowed to do that either. The wiki is supposed to be a game source with accurate information. If a group wants to promote their ideal image of themselves, they can do it on their group page, not the suburb page.--tyx94 14:05, 10 February 2011 (UTC)

Back from work. So, Tyx, can we leave it at BCH being listed as survivor group and DITPS as whatever they want, or is this still a matter of arbies? (I'd never accept Yon as arbitot - his leadership of DvB creates a massive conflict of interests, and he has already sided with Tyx' stance on his own talk page, making him clearly not a neutral party.) -- Spiderzed▋ 14:32, 10 February 2011 (UTC)

Yeah, I know, I was being sarcastic.--Yonnua Koponen ^{Talk ! Contribs} 15:53, 10 February 2011 (UTC)

No, we can't. I'm not going to sit back and allow you to abuse the wiki, no more than I'll let Deathwire get away with it, no matter what his reasons. Aren't you up for election as a sysop, or whatever promotion it is? Aren't you supposed to be working to keep the wiki at its very best, an unbiased wealth of information for new players? I can't believe that you, someone who puts a lot of time into this place, would actually be abusing the system like this. You can either change it yourself, or yes, I'm happy to have the matter arbitrated. In fact, it probably should be, to establish a precendent. (And no, I wouldn't let Yon do it either, but I suspected he was kidding)--tyx94 16:05, 10 February 2011 (UTC)

I view our listing not only as according to the wiki rules, but also in line with the truth. As for arbies, here you go. Pick already an arbitot from the list so that we can make that quick. -- Spiderzed▋ 16:15, 10 February 2011 (UTC)

I want to be a co-complainant with Tyx.--Yonnua Koponen ^{Talk ! Contribs} 16:17, 10 February 2011 (UTC)

I agree. Keep your roleplaying to your group pages. Suburb pages should be NPOV. I don't care if you're fighting for the greater good, if 3/4 of your time is spend killing pro-survivors then you're a PKer. Though I'd rather not see this through arbitration (yet). The concept of whether suburb group lists should be NPOV or from a group's POV should be handled through a policy discussion, where everybody has a say on things. If you manage to pass the policy, then you can take groups to arbitration where a neutral party can determine what kind of group it is. I highly recommend doing this (taking it to policy), and I wouldn't mind helping you in the right direction if you're unfamiliar with policy discussion. --Thadeous Oakley Talk 16:20, 10 February 2011 (UTC)

The Pk are listed as survivor, they are a pking group, if the group involed is protecting the suburb in there way they can be listed as pro-survivor there--^TCAPD(╯°□°)╯ ┻━┻ 16:28, 10 February 2011 (UTC)

They aren't, they go around PKing innocent civilians, including those in no way affiliated with the dulston alliance.--Yonnua Koponen ^{Talk ! Contribs} 17:53, 10 February 2011 (UTC)

Hows that to much differnt form the PK?--^TCAPD(╯°□°)╯ ┻━┻ 17:55, 10 February 2011 (UTC)

Philosophe Knights heal survivors as well and repair buildings. This group doesn't.--Yonnua Koponen ^{Talk ! Contribs} 18:02, 10 February 2011 (UTC)

That's not entirely true. They do sometimes, so they can take screenshots of it and use them to claim that they're pro-survivor.--tyx94 19:39, 10 February 2011 (UTC)

Thadeous, I would have to agree with you. If there is no exisiting policy, we need to create one. I would appreciate your help. My wiki-fu is rather weak, and I've never been involved in something like that before.--tyx94 16:24, 10 February 2011 (UTC)

screenshots

Could you please keep them off the wiki. You should be PMing those to a moderator on RG. I'm going to remove them from the pages you've posted them on. Thanks. ~ _{18:46, 23 August 2011 (UTC)}

May I ask why? I haven't glorified, approved of, or otherwise done anything wrong with them. I'm simply providing proof of Sammy's actions, which, in order to get anyone to believe you nowadays, you must have. I'm not trying to argue for the sake of arguing here, but I really don't see a problem.--tyx94 22:15, 23 August 2011 (BST)

Also, I can't say I appreciate you messing with my posts. At least put underneath that you did remove something. And since when can't we have this on the BAR page? The entire group approved putting it up there, so why exactly does it need to be removed?--tyx94 22:18, 23 August 2011 (BST)

Its to prevent further embarrassment of the victims. RG asks that you provide them directly with any screenshots you might have collected as evidence. It's there at the top of the page you posted on. ~ _{22:25, 23 August 2011 (UTC)}

That's it? I don't think embarrassment is an issue in this case. Would you like me to get her express permission?--tyx94 22:33, 23 August 2011 (BST)

No just follow the rules of that page. If you want to post that stuff on your group's own page its your perogative. I was just trying to help her out. She's already thanked me on Spiderzed's page. ~ _{23:16, 23 August 2011 (UTC)}