User talk:DanceDanceRevolution/sandpit/8: Difference between revisions
From The Urban Dead Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
(New page: possible images: [[Image:Mall1.jpg] Image:Mallcreed.jpg Image:Mallcreed.jpg Image:Mall4.jpg Image:Mall5.jpg) |
(→So...) |
||
| (15 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
possible images: | possible images: | ||
[[Image:Mall1.jpg] | [[Image:Mall1.jpg]] | ||
[[Image:Mallcreed.jpg]] | [[Image:Mallcreed.jpg]] | ||
[[Image: | [[Image:Mallcreed2.jpg]] | ||
[[Image:Mall4.jpg]] | [[Image:Mall4.jpg]] | ||
[[Image:Mall5.jpg]] | [[Image:Mall5.jpg]] | ||
[[Image:Pitney1.jpg]] | |||
==Tell me when you've finished== | |||
and I'll add stuff. --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 15:43, 17 September 2010 (BST) | |||
:This occurred during my "sabbatical" from UD so I can't really help with content, but I could probably help edit stuff if you want DDR. -[[User:MHSstaff|MHSstaff]] 00:00, 22 September 2010 (BST) | |||
::Absolutely. Knock yourself out, this is gonna be a pretty sporadic project because rewriting masses of information burns me out pretty quick. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 07:18, 22 September 2010 (BST) | |||
==So...== | |||
I started editing and then I realized I had no idea what you were thinking should be changed or needs improvement, so I stopped around the Siege of Morrish; feel free to revert/kill/dump/cade what you feel doesn't make sense. What do you think are the biggest problems with the original article, and what areas need the most improvement? -[[User:MHSstaff|MHSstaff]] 03:03, 8 October 2010 (BST) | |||
: Looks like a lot of people complained about the side bar,especially numbers and kills, the conclusions section, some of the judgmental wording in the main article, and the scope of the battle (Giddings / Morrish vs a battle for the entire suburb). Also, "horde" is apparently a loaded term. Whatever that means. -[[User:MHSstaff|MHSstaff]] 03:39, 8 October 2010 (BST) | |||
:Basically everything ''above'' the "The Siege of the Morrish building" header was my re-worded account of the original article. Everything below that needs to be re-written and generally cut down IMO. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 03:45, 8 October 2010 (BST) | |||
::Heh. Whoops. Sorry DDR. Got it. -[[User:MHSstaff|MHSstaff]]03:47, 8 October 2010 (BST) | |||
::How much do you want to cut it by? -[[User:MHSstaff|MHSstaff]] 03:48, 8 October 2010 (BST) | |||
:::Well, the issue isn't cutting it down to a certain length, it's just cutting out all the POV and unnecessary shit that was written in. I guess the mentality we have should be "keep it in if it's important or is worth the effort to re-word it into the article". We don't have to make a masterpiece, but I'd really like to give it the best chance to make Historical Events finally. Just do what you think is good mate. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 03:52, 8 October 2010 (BST) | |||
== Possible image w/ caption == | |||
[[Image:Zombi 2 cadeblock.jpg|280px|left|thumb|The new updates forced survivors to keep a close eye on barricades.]] | |||
Yes this is an awful awful pun. However I figure we're very light on images nabbed from the ''giallo'' zombie movies we Europeans cut our teeth on, in favour of Romero's hits and misses, and the modern proto-trenchie genre. Moar goar I say. {{User:Misanthropy/Sig}} 03:37, 8 October 2010 (BST) | |||
Latest revision as of 02:52, 8 October 2010
possible images:
Tell me when you've finished
and I'll add stuff. --RosslessnessWant a Location Image? 15:43, 17 September 2010 (BST)
- This occurred during my "sabbatical" from UD so I can't really help with content, but I could probably help edit stuff if you want DDR. -MHSstaff 00:00, 22 September 2010 (BST)
So...
I started editing and then I realized I had no idea what you were thinking should be changed or needs improvement, so I stopped around the Siege of Morrish; feel free to revert/kill/dump/cade what you feel doesn't make sense. What do you think are the biggest problems with the original article, and what areas need the most improvement? -MHSstaff 03:03, 8 October 2010 (BST)
- Looks like a lot of people complained about the side bar,especially numbers and kills, the conclusions section, some of the judgmental wording in the main article, and the scope of the battle (Giddings / Morrish vs a battle for the entire suburb). Also, "horde" is apparently a loaded term. Whatever that means. -MHSstaff 03:39, 8 October 2010 (BST)
- Basically everything above the "The Siege of the Morrish building" header was my re-worded account of the original article. Everything below that needs to be re-written and generally cut down IMO. -- LEMON #1 03:45, 8 October 2010 (BST)
- Heh. Whoops. Sorry DDR. Got it. -MHSstaff03:47, 8 October 2010 (BST)
- How much do you want to cut it by? -MHSstaff 03:48, 8 October 2010 (BST)
- Well, the issue isn't cutting it down to a certain length, it's just cutting out all the POV and unnecessary shit that was written in. I guess the mentality we have should be "keep it in if it's important or is worth the effort to re-word it into the article". We don't have to make a masterpiece, but I'd really like to give it the best chance to make Historical Events finally. Just do what you think is good mate. -- LEMON #1 03:52, 8 October 2010 (BST)
Possible image w/ caption
Yes this is an awful awful pun. However I figure we're very light on images nabbed from the giallo zombie movies we Europeans cut our teeth on, in favour of Romero's hits and misses, and the modern proto-trenchie genre. Moar goar I say. 
03:37, 8 October 2010 (BST)
