UDWiki talk:Administration/Arbitration/Poodle of doom vs DanceDanceRevolution (2): Difference between revisions
m (→What a joke!) |
m (Protected "UDWiki talk:Administration/Arbitration/Poodle of doom vs DanceDanceRevolution (2)": Administration Archive ([edit=sysop] (indefinite) [move=sysop] (indefinite))) |
||
(27 intermediate revisions by 11 users not shown) | |||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
::Dude, never defend your behavior with Iscariot's behavior. He is ''not'' a good example of how to behave and probably should have gotten banned from his harassment a dozen times over. --<small>[[User:Karek#K|Karek]]<sup><font face="Monotype Corsiva">[[User:Karek/ProjDev#Buildings_Update_Danger_Maps|maps 2.0?!]]</font></sup></small> 19:39, 29 September 2011 (BST) | ::Dude, never defend your behavior with Iscariot's behavior. He is ''not'' a good example of how to behave and probably should have gotten banned from his harassment a dozen times over. --<small>[[User:Karek#K|Karek]]<sup><font face="Monotype Corsiva">[[User:Karek/ProjDev#Buildings_Update_Danger_Maps|maps 2.0?!]]</font></sup></small> 19:39, 29 September 2011 (BST) | ||
:::God, I love it when we get to the part of the story where someone says something so stupid I don't know what to say. I was refering to Taco2's opening opening statement, where she comes out and says practically everything I've said. Point being, this level of bias isn't anything new here on the wiki. Neither is harrassment. The part that pisses me off the most is that everones in the act. You all know it, but won't admit it. -{{User:Poodle of doom/sig4}} 20:41, 29 September 2011 (BST) | :::God, I love it when we get to the part of the story where someone says something so stupid I don't know what to say. I was refering to Taco2's opening opening statement, where she comes out and says practically everything I've said. Point being, this level of bias isn't anything new here on the wiki. Neither is harrassment. The part that pisses me off the most is that everones in the act. You all know it, but won't admit it. -{{User:Poodle of doom/sig4}} 20:41, 29 September 2011 (BST) | ||
:::::Bias that doesn't exist was a pretty popular iscariot claim. DDR and I don't get along, especially recently, if I'm agreeing with him it's probably got less to do with a conspiracy and more to do with the fact that he's probably right and you were starting a fight over something that if you weren't looking for "harassment" you wouldn't and shouldn't find in anyway hostile. Again a common practice of iscariots. --<small>[[User:Karek#K|Karek]]<sup><font face="Monotype Corsiva">[[User:Karek/ProjDev#Buildings_Update_Danger_Maps|maps 2.0?!]]</font></sup></small> 17:23, 1 October 2011 (BST) | |||
::::Don't worry Poodle. As your arbitrator, I promise you a fair and realistic solution to this whole problem.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature}} 20:43, 29 September 2011 (BST) | ::::Don't worry Poodle. As your arbitrator, I promise you a fair and realistic solution to this whole problem.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature}} 20:43, 29 September 2011 (BST) | ||
:::::We'll see about that. -{{User:Poodle of doom/sig4}} 20:45, 29 September 2011 (BST) | :::::We'll see about that. -{{User:Poodle of doom/sig4}} 20:45, 29 September 2011 (BST) | ||
::::::But I have admitted it. Look. Up there. At the top. --[[User:Rosslessness|<sup>Hey Sweden!</sup>]] 20:47, 29 September 2011 (BST) | ::::::But I have admitted it. Look. Up there. At the top. --[[User:Rosslessness|<sup>Hey Sweden!</sup>]] 20:47, 29 September 2011 (BST) | ||
:::dont usually agree with the meister karek but an empatic ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig4}} 15:43, 30 September 2011 (BST) | |||
:wtf? Poodle fucking started it. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig4}} 14:18, 1 October 2011 (BST) | |||
==What a joke!== | ==What a joke!== | ||
And so comes the play on words, where no one can simply say what they mean, and strive to reach the heart of a problem. Instead, everyone will waste everyone elses time, babbling on about nonsense. Seriously, this is between DDR and myself. Karek has no need to be here... -{{User:Poodle of doom/sig4}} 20:58, 29 September 2011 (BST) | And so comes the play on words, where no one can simply say what they mean, and strive to reach the heart of a problem. Instead, everyone will waste everyone elses time, babbling on about nonsense. Seriously, this is between DDR and myself. Karek has no need to be here... -{{User:Poodle of doom/sig4}} 20:58, 29 September 2011 (BST) | ||
:As neutral arbitrator of this case, chosen by both parties, I feel it is necessary that we have a statement on record from Karek regarding this case.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature}} 21:01, 29 September 2011 (BST) | |||
::Regarding what exactly? About his [[User_talk:DanceDanceRevolution#Genius|level of bias]]? And then what? Are we going to address [[User_talk:Misanthropy#oi_you_bellend|this]] next? I'm sorry to say that you weren't "chosen", instead, you were less biased than the rest. At that, you were the only one DDR seemed willing to accept. -{{User:Poodle of doom/sig4}} 21:04, 29 September 2011 (BST) | |||
:::We shall most definitely discuss the inappropriate comments that took place between DDR and Misanthropy on Mis' talk page, but for now, I want to deal with the wider issue. As you alleged bias and misbehaviour by DDR, I thought it best to ask somebody who has made similar comments in the past, namely Karek. From here, we shall proceed down any avenues I feel necessary to compile enough evidence to rule upon this case, fairly, and with ''all'' the facts on the table. Is this acceptable?--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature}} 21:06, 29 September 2011 (BST) | |||
::::What you say makes sense, however I never claimed bias in this case on DDR's part. What I do claim is an ineffectual wiki staff who seems very much incapable to strike at the heart of the situation. The only real claim I make against DDR in this case is his antagonistic approach to a situation, and further documented hostile acts, starting with comments that have nothing to do with administering speedy deletions. Furthering my point, there are further acts I wish to address. I hope we get to a point where I can. -{{User:Poodle of doom/sig4}} 21:11, 29 September 2011 (BST) | |||
:::::So your looking at a procedure beyond your own experiences to safeguard new users? --[[User:Rosslessness|<sup>Hey Sweden!</sup>]] 21:13, 29 September 2011 (BST) | |||
:::::Don't worry Poodle. Although my methodology may seem unorthodox, I fully intend to have a comprehensive case. By the time it's over, I'm certain that you will feel that the entire situation has been satisfyingly dealt with.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature}} 21:16, 29 September 2011 (BST) | |||
::::::This has always alluded me in the past. We'll see. -{{User:Poodle of doom/sig4}} 21:19, 29 September 2011 (BST) | |||
:::::::You do know DDR isn't a sysop any longer, right? ~[[Image:Vsig.png|link=User:Vapor]] <sub>22:15, 29 September 2011 (UTC)</sub> | |||
::::::::Yeah I do... and that's part of my point. If he's not a sysop, what point was there in commenting on the A/SD if not to take a jab at me? -{{User:Poodle of doom/sig4}} 05:01, 30 September 2011 (BST) | |||
::lol poodle, I'm not biased in his favor, It's more that arbitration was made to deal with edit disputes not personal vendettas. And particularly not ones that are you reding something into a comment that just isn.'t there. --<small>[[User:Karek#K|Karek]]<sup><font face="Monotype Corsiva">[[User:Karek/ProjDev#Buildings_Update_Danger_Maps|maps 2.0?!]]</font></sup></small> 23:27, 29 September 2011 (BST) | |||
:::We really should just do away with arbies. There are other methods of conflict resolution we could be using that and we could avoid shit cases like this altogether. ~[[Image:Vsig.png|link=User:Vapor]] <sub>23:52, 29 September 2011 (UTC)</sub> | |||
::::I've tried but, maybe it'd be easier now without Grim blocking it. --<small>[[User:Karek#K|Karek]]<sup><font face="Monotype Corsiva">[[User:Karek/ProjDev#Buildings_Update_Danger_Maps|maps 2.0?!]]</font></sup></small> 02:50, 30 September 2011 (BST) | |||
==OBJECTION!== | |||
{{Quote|Karek|DDR is a meany and made hugnat cry, burn the witch?}} | |||
{{Objection!}} | |||
DDR is not a meany! He's a fun loving guy! I bring up the Malton Manhunt as evidence! Also, he did not make Hagnat cry! Hagnat was crying that day because the room was filled with onions! --[[User:Axe Hack|Phoenix Wright]] 01:20, 30 September 2011 (BST) | |||
: Can we still burn the witch?--{{User:Michaleson/sig}} 17:31, 30 September 2011 (BST) | |||
::Who do you think you are? Professor Layton? --[[User:Axe Hack|Phoenix Wright]] 01:38, 1 October 2011 (BST) | |||
== dafuq is dis shiet? == | |||
see header ^^ --<small>[[User:Hagnat|hagnat]]</small> 02:04, 30 September 2011 (BST) | |||
== Fuck this shit! == | |||
You guys had a wiki nonsense party and you didn't invite me? I'm insulted. | |||
Also, I'd like to take over arbitration. --[[User:Karloth_vois|Karloth Vois]] <sup>[[¯\(°_o)/¯]]</sup> 13:07, 30 September 2011 (BST) | |||
:No, but you can make a statement.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature}} 21:31, 30 September 2011 (BST) | |||
::Can I be DDR's defense attorney? :P --[[User:Axe Hack|Phoenix Wright]] 02:25, 1 October 2011 (BST) | |||
:::Yes, I authorise you to make any supplementary statements for DDR under the given header.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature}} 13:36, 2 October 2011 (BST) | |||
== who.said yonnua has the wrst humour == | |||
That bloke rules. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig4}} 15:42, 30 September 2011 (BST) | |||
:once does not make for the funny.--{{User:Sexualharrison/sig}}<small>20:21, 4 October 2011 (bst)</small> | |||
::prejudice saddens. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig4}} 05:25, 5 October 2011 (BST) |
Latest revision as of 00:42, 13 December 2011
this is a ploy to run people off the wiki.
I admit it. Checkmate. --Hey Sweden! 18:26, 29 September 2011 (BST)
- And don't act like my complaints over these actions, or this accusation is completely original to me. -Poodle of DoomT*C 19:14, 29 September 2011 (BST)
- Dude, never defend your behavior with Iscariot's behavior. He is not a good example of how to behave and probably should have gotten banned from his harassment a dozen times over. --Karekmaps 2.0?! 19:39, 29 September 2011 (BST)
- God, I love it when we get to the part of the story where someone says something so stupid I don't know what to say. I was refering to Taco2's opening opening statement, where she comes out and says practically everything I've said. Point being, this level of bias isn't anything new here on the wiki. Neither is harrassment. The part that pisses me off the most is that everones in the act. You all know it, but won't admit it. -Poodle of DoomT*C 20:41, 29 September 2011 (BST)
- Bias that doesn't exist was a pretty popular iscariot claim. DDR and I don't get along, especially recently, if I'm agreeing with him it's probably got less to do with a conspiracy and more to do with the fact that he's probably right and you were starting a fight over something that if you weren't looking for "harassment" you wouldn't and shouldn't find in anyway hostile. Again a common practice of iscariots. --Karekmaps 2.0?! 17:23, 1 October 2011 (BST)
- Don't worry Poodle. As your arbitrator, I promise you a fair and realistic solution to this whole problem.--Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 20:43, 29 September 2011 (BST)
- We'll see about that. -Poodle of DoomT*C 20:45, 29 September 2011 (BST)
- But I have admitted it. Look. Up there. At the top. --Hey Sweden! 20:47, 29 September 2011 (BST)
- We'll see about that. -Poodle of DoomT*C 20:45, 29 September 2011 (BST)
- dont usually agree with the meister karek but an empatic ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ -- ϑanceϑanceℜevolution 15:43, 30 September 2011 (BST)
- God, I love it when we get to the part of the story where someone says something so stupid I don't know what to say. I was refering to Taco2's opening opening statement, where she comes out and says practically everything I've said. Point being, this level of bias isn't anything new here on the wiki. Neither is harrassment. The part that pisses me off the most is that everones in the act. You all know it, but won't admit it. -Poodle of DoomT*C 20:41, 29 September 2011 (BST)
- Dude, never defend your behavior with Iscariot's behavior. He is not a good example of how to behave and probably should have gotten banned from his harassment a dozen times over. --Karekmaps 2.0?! 19:39, 29 September 2011 (BST)
- wtf? Poodle fucking started it. -- ϑanceϑanceℜevolution 14:18, 1 October 2011 (BST)
What a joke!
And so comes the play on words, where no one can simply say what they mean, and strive to reach the heart of a problem. Instead, everyone will waste everyone elses time, babbling on about nonsense. Seriously, this is between DDR and myself. Karek has no need to be here... -Poodle of DoomT*C 20:58, 29 September 2011 (BST)
- As neutral arbitrator of this case, chosen by both parties, I feel it is necessary that we have a statement on record from Karek regarding this case.--Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 21:01, 29 September 2011 (BST)
- Regarding what exactly? About his level of bias? And then what? Are we going to address this next? I'm sorry to say that you weren't "chosen", instead, you were less biased than the rest. At that, you were the only one DDR seemed willing to accept. -Poodle of DoomT*C 21:04, 29 September 2011 (BST)
- We shall most definitely discuss the inappropriate comments that took place between DDR and Misanthropy on Mis' talk page, but for now, I want to deal with the wider issue. As you alleged bias and misbehaviour by DDR, I thought it best to ask somebody who has made similar comments in the past, namely Karek. From here, we shall proceed down any avenues I feel necessary to compile enough evidence to rule upon this case, fairly, and with all the facts on the table. Is this acceptable?--Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 21:06, 29 September 2011 (BST)
- What you say makes sense, however I never claimed bias in this case on DDR's part. What I do claim is an ineffectual wiki staff who seems very much incapable to strike at the heart of the situation. The only real claim I make against DDR in this case is his antagonistic approach to a situation, and further documented hostile acts, starting with comments that have nothing to do with administering speedy deletions. Furthering my point, there are further acts I wish to address. I hope we get to a point where I can. -Poodle of DoomT*C 21:11, 29 September 2011 (BST)
- So your looking at a procedure beyond your own experiences to safeguard new users? --Hey Sweden! 21:13, 29 September 2011 (BST)
- Don't worry Poodle. Although my methodology may seem unorthodox, I fully intend to have a comprehensive case. By the time it's over, I'm certain that you will feel that the entire situation has been satisfyingly dealt with.--Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 21:16, 29 September 2011 (BST)
- This has always alluded me in the past. We'll see. -Poodle of DoomT*C 21:19, 29 September 2011 (BST)
- You do know DDR isn't a sysop any longer, right? ~ 22:15, 29 September 2011 (UTC)
- Yeah I do... and that's part of my point. If he's not a sysop, what point was there in commenting on the A/SD if not to take a jab at me? -Poodle of DoomT*C 05:01, 30 September 2011 (BST)
- You do know DDR isn't a sysop any longer, right? ~ 22:15, 29 September 2011 (UTC)
- This has always alluded me in the past. We'll see. -Poodle of DoomT*C 21:19, 29 September 2011 (BST)
- What you say makes sense, however I never claimed bias in this case on DDR's part. What I do claim is an ineffectual wiki staff who seems very much incapable to strike at the heart of the situation. The only real claim I make against DDR in this case is his antagonistic approach to a situation, and further documented hostile acts, starting with comments that have nothing to do with administering speedy deletions. Furthering my point, there are further acts I wish to address. I hope we get to a point where I can. -Poodle of DoomT*C 21:11, 29 September 2011 (BST)
- We shall most definitely discuss the inappropriate comments that took place between DDR and Misanthropy on Mis' talk page, but for now, I want to deal with the wider issue. As you alleged bias and misbehaviour by DDR, I thought it best to ask somebody who has made similar comments in the past, namely Karek. From here, we shall proceed down any avenues I feel necessary to compile enough evidence to rule upon this case, fairly, and with all the facts on the table. Is this acceptable?--Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 21:06, 29 September 2011 (BST)
- Regarding what exactly? About his level of bias? And then what? Are we going to address this next? I'm sorry to say that you weren't "chosen", instead, you were less biased than the rest. At that, you were the only one DDR seemed willing to accept. -Poodle of DoomT*C 21:04, 29 September 2011 (BST)
- lol poodle, I'm not biased in his favor, It's more that arbitration was made to deal with edit disputes not personal vendettas. And particularly not ones that are you reding something into a comment that just isn.'t there. --Karekmaps 2.0?! 23:27, 29 September 2011 (BST)
- We really should just do away with arbies. There are other methods of conflict resolution we could be using that and we could avoid shit cases like this altogether. ~ 23:52, 29 September 2011 (UTC)
- I've tried but, maybe it'd be easier now without Grim blocking it. --Karekmaps 2.0?! 02:50, 30 September 2011 (BST)
- We really should just do away with arbies. There are other methods of conflict resolution we could be using that and we could avoid shit cases like this altogether. ~ 23:52, 29 September 2011 (UTC)
- lol poodle, I'm not biased in his favor, It's more that arbitration was made to deal with edit disputes not personal vendettas. And particularly not ones that are you reding something into a comment that just isn.'t there. --Karekmaps 2.0?! 23:27, 29 September 2011 (BST)
OBJECTION!
Karek said: |
DDR is a meany and made hugnat cry, burn the witch? |
OBJECTION! | |
This user has an objection. |
DDR is not a meany! He's a fun loving guy! I bring up the Malton Manhunt as evidence! Also, he did not make Hagnat cry! Hagnat was crying that day because the room was filled with onions! --Phoenix Wright 01:20, 30 September 2011 (BST)
- Can we still burn the witch?--TCAPD(╯°□°)╯ ┻━┻ 17:31, 30 September 2011 (BST)
- Who do you think you are? Professor Layton? --Phoenix Wright 01:38, 1 October 2011 (BST)
dafuq is dis shiet?
see header ^^ --hagnat 02:04, 30 September 2011 (BST)
Fuck this shit!
You guys had a wiki nonsense party and you didn't invite me? I'm insulted.
Also, I'd like to take over arbitration. --Karloth Vois ¯\(°_o)/¯ 13:07, 30 September 2011 (BST)
- No, but you can make a statement.--Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 21:31, 30 September 2011 (BST)
- Can I be DDR's defense attorney? :P --Phoenix Wright 02:25, 1 October 2011 (BST)
- Yes, I authorise you to make any supplementary statements for DDR under the given header.--Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 13:36, 2 October 2011 (BST)
- Can I be DDR's defense attorney? :P --Phoenix Wright 02:25, 1 October 2011 (BST)
who.said yonnua has the wrst humour
That bloke rules. -- ϑanceϑanceℜevolution 15:42, 30 September 2011 (BST)
- once does not make for the funny.--User:Sexualharrison20:21, 4 October 2011 (bst)
- prejudice saddens. -- ϑanceϑanceℜevolution 05:25, 5 October 2011 (BST)