User talk:Haliman111: Difference between revisions
Haliman111 (talk | contribs) |
|||
Line 157: | Line 157: | ||
I assure you if it was bullshit why would even bother in the first place? I would just stay with umbrella. I am only here to try to remonstrate and forge an alliance against EoE. If you would rather not believe me so be it. I wont bother spending my time trying to convince you.--[[User:Rohanzap|Rohanzap]] 00:50, 8 February 2009 (UTC) | I assure you if it was bullshit why would even bother in the first place? I would just stay with umbrella. I am only here to try to remonstrate and forge an alliance against EoE. If you would rather not believe me so be it. I wont bother spending my time trying to convince you.--[[User:Rohanzap|Rohanzap]] 00:50, 8 February 2009 (UTC) | ||
:I'm just saying. So far, everytime UC has approached me with a chance to work together, you guys fucked it up by a) Turning on us, or b) Not helping at all. --{{User:Haliman111/sig}} 01:05, 8 February 2009 (UTC) | :I'm just saying. So far, everytime UC has approached me with a chance to work together, you guys fucked it up by a) Turning on us, or b) Not helping at all. --{{User:Haliman111/sig}} 01:05, 8 February 2009 (UTC) | ||
Here is the honest deal. Have you ever been approached by me offering you an alliance? I give you my word that there shall be no betrayal not now not afterwards. Another safety net would be that if Umbrella does betray you then i shall leave. We shall help you as together we will be able to defeat EoE much more easily than if we were working seperatly. If co-ordinated dual strikes were perpetrated against their members then they would soon lose interest and disappear. The alliance would continue depending upon the leaders feelings. If you and the UC leaders felt that it wasnt working out you could remain neutral and come together again to face a common foe such as EoE. However, if you were to feel that the alliance was beneficial then you could work closely with the UC and eventually become true allies while expanding the sphere of influence. Working together would mean more members, greater recognition and more power for both parties. | |||
I would like to say that my opinion in things has been taken more seriously of late and i assure you that i will not stand for a betrayal. |
Revision as of 01:31, 8 February 2009
Directions for PostingIf replying to a comment, please add a colon. ":" If replying to a reply, please add that many colons, plus one. Please sign all comments, and NO FLAMING, PLEASE! Also, remember:
MethManThe Meth Man says: Fear no zeds!! Fear no death!! Fear the Meth!! The Meth Man jumps from the window. --Lithedarkangel 00:16, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
Drama?Funny wiki drama. Hahaha. Don't worry Hal. We do have the needles and the ammo. :) --LithedarkangelMeth!The Great Meth Man 02:03, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
This seems like the right place, anyway. Regarding the copyrighted thing. It certainly wouldn't be the first time a user in all seriousness tried to claim group stuff as copyrighted which might be why it was commented on there, Boxy has had to deal with it in the past. --Karekmaps?! 14:05, 30 December 2008 (UTC) Interesting... I started this bit and now a whole talk is written. Hal many people are stalking your talk page. --LithedarkangelMeth!The Great Meth Man 22:04, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
*Charges in a la Pedobear* Did someone say stalkage?-- dǝǝɥs oʇ ɯɐds: sʎɐʍ1ɐ! 22:54, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
Your color schemeIt hurts my eyes :) --Pestolence(talk) 03:24, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
The Status ReportersI commented in full har. I'll help, just give me a few days. Linkthewindow Talk 13:16, 30 December 2008 (UTC) Cookie
Glows?Enough glowing? --LithedarkangelMeth!The Great Meth Man 03:31, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
No more.Please, stop the wiki drama Hal. We will solve this. :) --LithedarkangelMeth!The Great Meth Man 19:59, 2 January 2009 (UTC) ArbitrationUmbrella have posted that they accept the arbitration and will represent themselves. I highly recommend, regardless of what others say, that you do not let this case drop and pursue it to the conclusion. -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 05:48, 11 January 2009 (UTC) Hey Boss!If you are changing the forum, now would be a good time to use the requested name change...you know? It did get the majority. Urban Biohazard Containment Service. or not. =/ --Megameh 21:59, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
Grammatical fixThanks for fixing that up for me, I was trying to decided between "then" and "than". Language is not my strongest suit. =P - Jedaz - 03:45/16/01/2009
BDCheck your PMs on our board man. BD (i'd use my sig, but it's freaking messed up right now)
Headline textUC alliance with UBCS Dear Haliman, I am extending the hand of friendship to you from the Umbrella Corporation. I have been in talks with jackson over recent events including the repeated attacks and spying perpetrated by the EoE. I relise that you approached us with an offer to take down EoE together and we rebuked you. I formerly apologise on behalf of the Corporation. We are willing to work together to take down a common foe that is attacking us both indiscriminantly. I would also like you to unblock the I.P of "Guest" from "NEXUS" i am sorry to state that it was me in an unashamed attempt to gain enterance to your forum so that i would be able to see what was going on. I formarly apologise for my actions. I would like access to your forums as a diplomat/ liason and i shall work on afford the same treatment to you or a diplomat of your choice. If it is acceptable i would also like for Umbrella Corp personnel to have access to your forum as roleplayers. They would have access to the thread for roleplaying only. We would also afford the same to you with our forum. I shall also work on trying to get the haliman files taken down if you afford us the same with taking down the Umbrella zerg and fraud claims. I hope these agreements submit to your standards. I await your response with baited breath good sir. --Rohanzap 23:20, 7 February 2009 (UTC) I assure you if it was bullshit why would even bother in the first place? I would just stay with umbrella. I am only here to try to remonstrate and forge an alliance against EoE. If you would rather not believe me so be it. I wont bother spending my time trying to convince you.--Rohanzap 00:50, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
Here is the honest deal. Have you ever been approached by me offering you an alliance? I give you my word that there shall be no betrayal not now not afterwards. Another safety net would be that if Umbrella does betray you then i shall leave. We shall help you as together we will be able to defeat EoE much more easily than if we were working seperatly. If co-ordinated dual strikes were perpetrated against their members then they would soon lose interest and disappear. The alliance would continue depending upon the leaders feelings. If you and the UC leaders felt that it wasnt working out you could remain neutral and come together again to face a common foe such as EoE. However, if you were to feel that the alliance was beneficial then you could work closely with the UC and eventually become true allies while expanding the sphere of influence. Working together would mean more members, greater recognition and more power for both parties. I would like to say that my opinion in things has been taken more seriously of late and i assure you that i will not stand for a betrayal. |