User talk:BobBoberton: Difference between revisions

From The Urban Dead Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
mNo edit summary
(updating with fancy)
Line 1: Line 1:
{| style="width:100%; font-family: sans-serif; color: #FFFFFF" align=center CELLPADDING=0 CELLSPACING=0
|-
| style="padding:8px; vertical-align:top; background-color:#666666; border-left:solid 2px #000000; border-top:solid 2px #000000; border-bottom:solid 2px #000000; text-align:left"|
=This Here's A Talk Page!=
New edits go right at the bottom; use level two (==) headers, please! Also, please sign your posts and understand I may baleete your comments from time to time.
__TOC__
==Suggestion Talk==
Hey man, you commented on my suggestion but did you read my reply? Your point is that caution should take extra AP - well guess what, players without free running have that risk removed without having to do anything extra, while someone with free running must take extra AP to remove that risk. Does that sound right to you? --[[User:ScaredPlayer|ScaredPlayer]] 01:52, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
Hey man, you commented on my suggestion but did you read my reply? Your point is that caution should take extra AP - well guess what, players without free running have that risk removed without having to do anything extra, while someone with free running must take extra AP to remove that risk. Does that sound right to you? --[[User:ScaredPlayer|ScaredPlayer]] 01:52, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
:Yes, but they can't free run. And like whoever-it-was said, toggling Free Running would be a better suggestion. --{{User:BobBoberton/sig}} 01:53, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
:Yes, but they can't free run. And like whoever-it-was said, toggling Free Running would be a better suggestion. --{{User:BobBoberton/sig}} 01:53, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
Thank you for the explanation Bob, that's all I was really looking for. Perhaps someone will make that suggestion in the future hopefully. --[[User:ScaredPlayer|ScaredPlayer]] 01:58, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
::Thank you for the explanation Bob, that's all I was really looking for. Perhaps someone will make that suggestion in the future hopefully. --[[User:ScaredPlayer|ScaredPlayer]] 01:58, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
:::Oh, and I would have suggested implementing either toggling FR or removing fall damage, but the suggestion tips said not to give people choices. I'm actually happy with either-or. --[[User:ScaredPlayer|ScaredPlayer]] 02:06, 26 March 2009 (UTC)


Oh, and I would have suggested implementing either toggling FR or removing fall damage, but the suggestion tips said not to give people choices. I'm actually happy with either-or. --[[User:ScaredPlayer|ScaredPlayer]] 02:06, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
<!-- Place new edits just above this line! -->
|}

Revision as of 14:53, 19 May 2009

This Here's A Talk Page!

New edits go right at the bottom; use level two (==) headers, please! Also, please sign your posts and understand I may baleete your comments from time to time.

Suggestion Talk

Hey man, you commented on my suggestion but did you read my reply? Your point is that caution should take extra AP - well guess what, players without free running have that risk removed without having to do anything extra, while someone with free running must take extra AP to remove that risk. Does that sound right to you? --ScaredPlayer 01:52, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

Yes, but they can't free run. And like whoever-it-was said, toggling Free Running would be a better suggestion. --Bob Boberton TF / DW 01:53, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
Thank you for the explanation Bob, that's all I was really looking for. Perhaps someone will make that suggestion in the future hopefully. --ScaredPlayer 01:58, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
Oh, and I would have suggested implementing either toggling FR or removing fall damage, but the suggestion tips said not to give people choices. I'm actually happy with either-or. --ScaredPlayer 02:06, 26 March 2009 (UTC)