Talk:Spambit Hunters: Difference between revisions
From The Urban Dead Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
Then again, if we keep their spam, doesn't that mean they win?! {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig}}{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/status}} 01:27, 12 April 2009 (BST) | Then again, if we keep their spam, doesn't that mean they win?! {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig}}{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/status}} 01:27, 12 April 2009 (BST) | ||
:Only if you include the ''damn'' links ;) <small>-- [[User:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">boxy</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">talk</span>]] • [[The Rules|teh rulz]]</sup> 07:35 18 April 2009 (BST)</small> |
Revision as of 06:35, 18 April 2009
Want to join?
Sign up here for the Spambit Hunters and you many soon be riding with the best the wiki has to offer:
Cannon Fodder Recruits sign under here
Hai. ■■ 19:53, 11 April 2009 (BST)
- You're in. Catch those damn spambits. DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) OFFLINE 15:10, 17 April 2009 (BST)
Also
Yes, this is a bit of a pisstake. Particularly aimed at those people on XBox live and PSN who take themselves way too seriously. =) -- Cheese 09:37, 11 April 2009 (BST)
- Poorly done Cheese, I mean you've not made any spelling errors or basic grammar mistakes. Nor do you have a poorly edited picture (MS Paint preferred) advertising the awesomeness. Not even a single reference to the latest internet meme. I mean seriously, how do you plan on making a 1337 group without any of that? -- RoosterDragon 14:50, 11 April 2009 (BST)
The archive of the spambits
We should get a list of the ones we kill. We could even get a quotes section with the best snippets from the spam pages they make.
Then again, if we keep their spam, doesn't that mean they win?! DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) OFFLINE 01:27, 12 April 2009 (BST)