Talk:Zombiefark: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
-The accusation of zerging comes from the fact that "X"roach is zerging. Of course, I can't prove it, but that's because I don't have the time. I don't have the time because I don't take this game as seriously as groups of players who have played multiple other web-based games together and spend a good amount of *their* time coordinating raids. I thereby retract any such accusation against Zombiefark. Instead, I accuse Zombiefark of associating with (though not necessarily supporting) a zerger. If [the plural] you feel that the original accusation(s) were personal, that's because a zerger is one person, and therefore a rant against a zerger can be nothing but personal. Right? But because [the plural] you are not the actual zerger, but a group of players who have played multiple other web-based games together in order to spread the word of Barhah throughout UD and picked up a zerging compatriate, then my rant cannot be personal to Zombiefark unless Zombiefark chooses to take it personally. Given that Zombiefark has multiple web-based game playing experience, [the plural] you are probably able to detect my indignantly sarcastic tone, which is not to be mistaken for patronizing invective. However, I can see how [the plural] you might have been confused & therefore concluded I am taking the game too seriously. The only thing our group is seriously bent on conducting is friendly philosophical debate over frosty mugs of virtual beer, and the torching of zombies. It's hard to do any of those activities when [the plural] you and zerging compatriates *constantly* target us--whether or not we're at the Musgrove Arms. It's not fun for a person who chooses a survivor persona to be dead 100% of the time. That makes the game fun for [the plural] you, but not for [the singular] me. If trying to actually have fun is taking a game too seriously, then I am guilty as charged. --[[User:She bean|She bean]] 16:48, 15 June 2009 (BST) | -The accusation of zerging comes from the fact that "X"roach is zerging. Of course, I can't prove it, but that's because I don't have the time. I don't have the time because I don't take this game as seriously as groups of players who have played multiple other web-based games together and spend a good amount of *their* time coordinating raids. I thereby retract any such accusation against Zombiefark. Instead, I accuse Zombiefark of associating with (though not necessarily supporting) a zerger. If [the plural] you feel that the original accusation(s) were personal, that's because a zerger is one person, and therefore a rant against a zerger can be nothing but personal. Right? But because [the plural] you are not the actual zerger, but a group of players who have played multiple other web-based games together in order to spread the word of Barhah throughout UD and picked up a zerging compatriate, then my rant cannot be personal to Zombiefark unless Zombiefark chooses to take it personally. Given that Zombiefark has multiple web-based game playing experience, [the plural] you are probably able to detect my indignantly sarcastic tone, which is not to be mistaken for patronizing invective. However, I can see how [the plural] you might have been confused & therefore concluded I am taking the game too seriously. The only thing our group is seriously bent on conducting is friendly philosophical debate over frosty mugs of virtual beer, and the torching of zombies. It's hard to do any of those activities when [the plural] you and zerging compatriates *constantly* target us--whether or not we're at the Musgrove Arms. It's not fun for a person who chooses a survivor persona to be dead 100% of the time. That makes the game fun for [the plural] you, but not for [the singular] me. If trying to actually have fun is taking a game too seriously, then I am guilty as charged. --[[User:She bean|She bean]] 16:48, 15 June 2009 (BST) | ||
Gents, since apparently this entire "zerging" complaint is now directed at me (which is odd because no one saw it prudent to post it on the wiki page of MY group) I have made response to the OPB on their discussion page. It seems to me the only evidence of zerging comes from one of the OPB misquoting my name initially on their "enemies" list as "PapaRoach." I assure you I am not zerging. [[User:Finnigan|KingRoach]] 14:18, 15 June 2009 | -Gents, since apparently this entire "zerging" complaint is now directed at me (which is odd because no one saw it prudent to post it on the wiki page of MY group) I have made response to the OPB on their discussion page. It seems to me the only evidence of zerging comes from one of the OPB misquoting my name initially on their "enemies" list as "PapaRoach." I assure you I am not zerging. [[User:Finnigan|KingRoach]] 14:18, 15 June 2009 | ||
===Islands=== | ===Islands=== | ||
Really cool idea, i hope you have success.--[[User:Bonghit420|Bonghit420]] 17:19, 15 June 2009 (BST) | Really cool idea, i hope you have success.--[[User:Bonghit420|Bonghit420]] 17:19, 15 June 2009 (BST) | ||
Revision as of 18:18, 15 June 2009
Hey zombie fark
Whats up? Just saw your speech in st ferreol's. Good job at the bank. whats your plan? --RosslessnessWant a Location Image? 19:25, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
COMPLAINT
PapaRoach, KingRoach, whatever RoachAss name you choose, I as a member of the Order of the Pure Blood, or whatever we end up renaming ourselves once we are able to regroup for more than 48 hours, officially put you on notice that any RoachName you are + ZombieFark are one & the same; and therefore you are '''ZERGING''' us in NE Spicer Hills for an individual, personal, petty need to feel superior/powerful/officious or dominating. Leave us the eff alone already. If you have a personal grudge against one of our group, I suggest you contact that person directly & work out your disagreement(s) rather than continually '''ZERGING''' us. p.s. If you gave us half a chance, you'd realize that we share your number one Farktivity; namely, consumption of beer. WTFBBQ? -She bean, OPB9. --[[User:She bean|She bean]] 21:33, 3 June 2009 (BST)
-I'm not sure where these accusations of Zerging come from. Kingroach is not a member of our group, but a friend who has been traveling with us for a few months. He is a member of the Harbingers of Peace. We in Zombiefark do not zerg and refuse to support any form of zerging. We are merely a group of players who have played multiple other web-based games together and came to Urban Dead in order to spread the word of Barhah. We found kingroach in our travels and his message seemed to match ours, that death is only a higher form of life and that peace can only be gained through death. We are a tight-knit and well coordinated group. We spend a good amount of time coordinating our raids. Your group seems to be bent on the destruction of everything Barhah and as such it would make us natural enemies. As we embarked on Island Hopping Tour 09 our aim was to turn all islands in Malton into temples of Barhah. We will continue on this mission until we complete it or are too drunk to stand. You call The Musgrove Arms your home. We call it a Temple of Barhah. -- biggaryk June 9, 2009
-The accusation of zerging comes from the fact that "X"roach is zerging. Of course, I can't prove it, but that's because I don't have the time. I don't have the time because I don't take this game as seriously as groups of players who have played multiple other web-based games together and spend a good amount of *their* time coordinating raids. I thereby retract any such accusation against Zombiefark. Instead, I accuse Zombiefark of associating with (though not necessarily supporting) a zerger. If [the plural] you feel that the original accusation(s) were personal, that's because a zerger is one person, and therefore a rant against a zerger can be nothing but personal. Right? But because [the plural] you are not the actual zerger, but a group of players who have played multiple other web-based games together in order to spread the word of Barhah throughout UD and picked up a zerging compatriate, then my rant cannot be personal to Zombiefark unless Zombiefark chooses to take it personally. Given that Zombiefark has multiple web-based game playing experience, [the plural] you are probably able to detect my indignantly sarcastic tone, which is not to be mistaken for patronizing invective. However, I can see how [the plural] you might have been confused & therefore concluded I am taking the game too seriously. The only thing our group is seriously bent on conducting is friendly philosophical debate over frosty mugs of virtual beer, and the torching of zombies. It's hard to do any of those activities when [the plural] you and zerging compatriates *constantly* target us--whether or not we're at the Musgrove Arms. It's not fun for a person who chooses a survivor persona to be dead 100% of the time. That makes the game fun for [the plural] you, but not for [the singular] me. If trying to actually have fun is taking a game too seriously, then I am guilty as charged. --She bean 16:48, 15 June 2009 (BST)
-Gents, since apparently this entire "zerging" complaint is now directed at me (which is odd because no one saw it prudent to post it on the wiki page of MY group) I have made response to the OPB on their discussion page. It seems to me the only evidence of zerging comes from one of the OPB misquoting my name initially on their "enemies" list as "PapaRoach." I assure you I am not zerging. KingRoach 14:18, 15 June 2009
Islands
Really cool idea, i hope you have success.--Bonghit420 17:19, 15 June 2009 (BST)
