Developing Guides

Developing Guides

This section is for presenting and reviewing guides which have not yet been submitted and are still being worked on.

Nothing on this page will be archived.

Please Read Before Posting

• Users should be aware that page is discussion oriented. Other users are free to express their own point of view and are not required to be neutral.
• If you decide not to take your Guide to review, please remove it from this page to avoid clutter. You may move the discussion to your guide's talk page if you wish to preserve a record of the discussion.

Adding a new Guide

Post all guides in the following format, changing only the text in red to reflect your Guide's name;

==[[Page Under Development]]==
--~~~~
===Comments===

Cycling Guides

• Guides with no new discussion in the past week may be removed.

• Any Guide posted on Guides/Review Should be removed from this page, any comments on this page should be copied onto the Guides talk page.

Please add new guides to the top of the list

---

Misanthropy's Map Toolbox

Mostly wanting feedback on the usefulness of it all. I'm happy with the layout and what have you already. 01:04, 10 March 2010 (UTC)

Comments

Out of curiosity, are Bevelled maps in "large" and "small" sections supposed to differ from the original maps? Because I assume though but both examples look the same for me. --

 

 

 

 

06:25, 10 March 2010 (UTC)

Yeah, that's one thing I need to fix. According to Aichon, the code in them only works for Firefox, so I'm going to have to make up ones for other browsers too. I need to get to that when I have an hour or so spare again. The difference is meant to be rounded corners for the overall square as opposed to sharp ones. 13:36, 10 March 2010 (UTC)

Yep, the "moz" in "-moz-border-radius" stands for Mozilla, and only works with Firefox and a handful of other browsers (e.g. Netscape, Camino, and some other minor ones). Truth be told, I was considering the idea of going around the entire wiki and cleaning up all references to the "-moz-" CSS properties in the help documents and elsewhere so that the docs referred to the template I linked you on my talk page. —Aichon— 18:53, 10 March 2010 (UTC)

For the record, I use FF and they still look the same for me. --

 

 

 

 

11:01, 21 March 2010 (UTC)

Two questions. First, are you sure? Look at the corners of this map carefully, since they are only VERY slightly rounded. Second, if you still don't see it, what version of FF are you using? I don't think they added the rounded corners until 3.0 or 3.1, though don't quote me on that. —Aichon— 19:50, 21 March 2010 (UTC)

Due to the way the cells work, rounding the outside too much leaves the cells in the corners protruding, so mild rounding of only a few pixels is all I went for. It's more noticable in the smaller versions than in the bigger ones. 19:55, 21 March 2010 (UTC)

I just did some more looking into the way that borders behave in WebKit vs. Mozilla, and I was a little naïve, it turns out. I thought that Mozilla had implemented a dual spec, where they had their own syntax as well as syntax that more closely matched WebKit's/the W3C's standard. Turns out they didn't, at least when it comes to rounding out specific corners. So, that template I linked is fine and dandy for doing border-radius, but if you try to do something like border-radius-topleft/border-top-left-radius, it'll break for one set of browsers or the other. I might just make a template for handling borders specifically, rather than a generic one like that template. Dunno yet. Anyway, just pointing it out as a heads up. —Aichon— 04:03, 24 March 2010 (UTC)

Things with names on belong in userspace. Things without names on live in the mainspace. Two choices, make a change. -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 20:06, 21 March 2010 (UTC)

Ghost Town Reclamation

--Rosslessness^{Want a Location Image?} 17:37, 7 March 2010 (UTC)

Comments

Tactically solid. Could do with a pass through for grammar/spelling, but that's not something that should stop it being considered sound advice. 18:04, 7 March 2010 (UTC)

It's all in shorthand, we'll all follow it because we know how to do it before we read the guide. It moves too quickly and without explanation for a newbie to follow. Explain why they're doing these things in detail so that even an American could understand it. I find the constant central intrusion of the map diagram to be dis-jarring when trying to read it as well. -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 18:18, 7 March 2010 (UTC)

Of course! Ill frame the maps or something and explain why you do stuff. Cheers. --Rosslessness^{Want a Location Image?} 20:22, 7 March 2010 (UTC)