Talk:AAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

Read this first! Newest messages at the bottom. Start all new topics with a Level Two (==Level Two==) Header. Remember to sign your posts with four (4) tildes (~~~~)

Less pleasant talky stuff can be found here. Tread with caution.

Launch Date

The AZ/DC will officially be open for business on March 24th. That doesn't mean we aren't out there causing all kinds of chaos, just that it's not a part of the official AZ/DC canon. If you are bored of party line Urban Dead come check us out. We will have achievements, random operations, contests etc along with a jukebox on the wiki, an IRC channel and all the Tequila and Pie you can consume.AZ/DC Forums -- MeesoSorry 20:22, 20 March 2012 (UTC)

Recruitment Advert

Your advert's image is 88.11KB. Please shrink it down to 56KB or it will be removed. Thank you. --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ ^{#nerftemplatedsigs} 13:45, 14 May 2012 (BST)

Fix'd.--RadicalWhig 06:58, 16 May 2012 (BST)

Diplomacy

I believe The Discordian Society to be a perfect candidate for ally/enemy/carpool status. ᚱᛁᚹᛖᚾᚨᚾᛏ 12:59, 21 May 2012 (BST)

Hark! Fellow followers of CHAOS? Is the Society still active? Is this too good to be true, fellow allies in our quest for randomosity? Will we be right back after a word from our sponsors? ARE MY WAFFLES BURNING? --RadicalWhig 22:00, 21 May 2012 (BST)

You might not know this, but..

...O13 maintains Lamport Walk as both a ceasefire zone and a no genny zone. I'll let you off the hook this time 'cause you don't know of the rules in place for Lamport. Also, don't think about targeting Lamport in the long run. That only gives us a reason to ruin/pinata our own HQ. This is probably all something I should add on Lamport's page...But I'm too lazy to be bothered. --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ ^{#nerftemplatedsigs} 14:32, 7 July 2012 (BST)

I thought it was quite funny. -- _{Org XIII} ^Alts 15:33, 7 July 2012 (BST)

The following banter can be found here. AZ/DC staff not responsible for potential brain damage.

Not our business, guys. Take it to your respective talk pages.--RadicalWhig 04:33, 12 July 2012 (BST)

Silly please don't serious

Holy shit Abby you really love pie. :P-- _{Org XIII} ^Alts 03:37, 12 July 2012 (BST)

How can anyone NOT really love pie?--Abby Omination - 04:32, 12 July 2012

What are your thoughts on cheese cake? Which is clearly a pie but called cake. And yes I do love pie although maybe not quite as much as you.-- _{Org XIII} ^Alts 04:50, 12 July 2012 (BST)

It is GREATNESS masquerading under MEDIOCRITY. A brilliant, cream-filled star wrapped in the foul baseness of icing and fluffiness. Cake is nowhere as EXTREME as pie, for pie shall never lie. --Abby Omination - 04:57, 12 July 2012

Pie is clearly the superior baked good. Cheese cake is an inferior yet acceptable substitute should pie not be available. Cake is basically sweet bread...fuck that noise. --MeesoSorry 15:57, 12 July 2012 (BST)

I see. So you're killing zeds too this week, hm? Well, you know where I am. Come get some. I'm talking to you, Abby. Though if you wanna bring your friends, I won't mind. B-) --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ ^{#nerftemplatedsigs} 23:28, 13 July 2012 (BST)

Sad face. :( What's wrong, Abby? You decided to take a break? I was all pumped up to turn your strike on me into a real time fight too...I'm disappointed you didn't come at your usual time. :( --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ ^{#nerftemplatedsigs} 02:03, 14 July 2012 (BST)

You really expected a group based on chaos to get into a routine? :P --Abby Omination 03:24, 14 July 2012 (BST)

Aw...But I wanted a real time fight...:( --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ ^{#nerftemplatedsigs} 04:03, 14 July 2012 (BST)

I just gave you one. It's not my fault if I'm so good the fight's one-sided. :D --Abby Omination 04:16, 14 July 2012 (BST)

It doesn't count if one person isn't active at the time. :( --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ ^{#nerftemplatedsigs} 04:23, 14 July 2012 (BST)

Of course you're not active. I just killed you. :P --Abby Omination 04:38, 14 July 2012 (BST)

While you are busy killing survivors, OrgXIII is killing months. Just wait till we find April. -- _{Org XIII} ^Alts 15:08, 14 July 2012 (BST)

Isn't the purposeful avoidance of a routine still a routine? Much like true random numbers, they don't always appear random in nature. If you truly wish to understand random, you should investigate cake. Pie exists in an equilibrium of balance, all pieces containing the potential to be completely equal. Cake, however, by it very nature is imbalanced and prone to inconsistency. Not saying you are wrong about the superiority of pie, just saying Rando probably eats cake. :P -- _{Org XIII} ^Alts 15:03, 14 July 2012 (BST)

BLASPHEMY!!! Pie...Cake...Rando cares not for these things...She sustains herself on the tears of those that curse her random will. And babies, she also eats babies. --MeesoSorry 15:55, 14 July 2012 (BST)

But! There is one such individual in Malton whose Rando's will has no effect on. In fact, Rando lost a poker game to this individual. His name is not known to all, but the world knows him only as...the Gambler of Legend. His luck knows no bounds. His power is extraordinary that it transcends the boundaries of other universes. For he is...Legendary. --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ ^{#nerftemplatedsigs} 16:50, 14 July 2012 (BST)

In fact, he is so legendary that there is even a card named after him. The only one he recognizes as his equal is his brother, the Sand Gambler. --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ ^{#nerftemplatedsigs} 17:01, 14 July 2012 (BST)

More blasphemy! Every individual, even the demigod Kevan, is subject to Rando's chaotic whims. She also thinks anime sucks. She told me once in an introspective, pastry induced vision. She said to me "Jimmy, my loyal servant, go forth and put assunder those which worship the unproportionately large eyed characatures." She then filled my mind with random images of kittens and pie. And waffles. James Slimm

That's odd, Jimmy. Me and Rando are drinking buddies and Rando assured me you were a otaku. -- _{Org XIII} ^Alts 18:09, 14 July 2012 (BST)

Rando's will has no effect on the Gambler of Legend. For his luck is extraordinarily legendary. He needs no unnatural force to do his bidding, for the legendary gambler makes his own luck. For the deadliest powers of luck isn't one that are predetermined by the hands of Fate. It is the one that makes your own fate. --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ ^{#nerftemplatedsigs} 18:30, 14 July 2012 (BST)

Pics or it doesn't happen. Show me where how this large eyed charlatin can land more than 5 consecutive punches upon another, and I may consider that he has Rando's favor. James Slimm 18:52, 14 July 2012 (BST)

When imbibing with Rando, do you bring your own table or does she drink you under hers? James Slimm

Yup, I'm under the table...if you get my meaning. ;) -- _{Org XIII} ^Alts 18:40, 14 July 2012 (BST)

Like I've said. Rando's favor is predetermined. The legendary gambler's fate isn't predetermined by unnatural forces, for his fate he carves out on his own through shear force of will. The cards, the dice, the coins. They are imbued with his will and power to surpass all. And as such, his extraordinary legendary luck carves out his own fate. Many have tried to defeat this legend. All have failed. For his fate, the fate he carves out with his own luck, is a force greater than even the will of Rando. --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ ^{#nerftemplatedsigs} 19:02, 14 July 2012 (BST)

Bah, you assume much about the Goddess. Go brush up on some scripture before returning here with your false beliefs and fantasiful claims of luck and fate. James Slimm 19:43, 14 July 2012 (BST)

And who really controls the dice, cards and coins? Your gambler's belief in his will and power imbuing them is merely the vodka speaking. Praise Rando.--Abby Omination 22:54, 14 July 2012 (BST)

You failed to note the cards, coins, and dice are no ordinary trinkets. With Ancient Egyptian voodoo magic, the legendary gambler's cards, coins, and dice are imbued with his own spirit, as well as the spirit of the Ma'at. As such, luck always favor him each and every time. And forever he shall wander the different universes looking for the ultimate challenger. The ultimate challenger who can break the bonds between the gambler and his spirit infused trinkets. ;) --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ ^{#nerftemplatedsigs} 00:39, 15 July 2012 (BST)

Egyptian voodoo magic? Pah! If there was such a thing, the Egyptian empire would be still around. But Rando... Rando is forever. Anyways, that means there's some strong-ass vodka the gambler is on. I would love to have some if I was capable of metabolizing alcohol. --Abby Omination 02:44, 15 July 2012 (BST)

I point to the following: "RNG processes things in a success rate in accordance to Murphy's Law, divided by Moore's Law, multiplied by the Square Root of a Piece of Cake." Proof Rando favors cake. From scripture. Game, set, cake. -- _{Org XIII} ^Alts 19:50, 14 July 2012 (BST)

This particular quote from the scripture is allegory and actually an expression of the worthlessness of cake. Rando's will cannot be predicted nor calculated. Consider these facts. Neither Moore's law nor Murphy's law are mathmatical theorums and cannot be expressed as integers or formulae. Cake is not a mathmatical expression either, though it is well know to be a lie and could theoretically be represented by zero. So while the square root of a piece of cake may be zero (cake*cake=0 if cake=0), any perceived calculation that could be made by the division of Moore's Law by Murphy's law would be negated by cake. Therefore, this formula can only be described as allegory for the fruitlessness of determing Rando's will. James Slimm

Also, even if we choose to take your statement at face value, Kirsty...as Meeso said, Rando cares not for either cake nor pie. Pie is an AZ/DC thing. However, she still realizes the inherent superiority of pie over cake and chooses not to waste it for her calculations, preferring to use the inferior cake for such a thing, leaving us to eat the wondrous pie as a show of her gratitude.--Abby Omination 22:54, 14 July 2012 (BST)

Your inability to see the square root of cake means little. Despite clever words there is no escape that without cake there could be no will of Rando. Without the will of Rando, there is no AZDC. So, your theories of lies and pies may help you sleep better at night, but ultimately your very existence is dependent on cake. Don't feel bad though, I present you this puzzle box to help take your mind off this painful realization. (P.S. Wait for me to leave before you open it.) -- _{Org XIII} ^Alts 01:48, 15 July 2012 (BST)

A contrario. No one said Rando had to use cake. Ergo, pie is sufficient, but She does not wish to waste such awesomeness. Ipso facto pie is sufficient as well. Q.E.D. Fuck your sweet bread noise. Veni vidi vici altur videtum Latin Latin Latin Latin Latin so forth and cui bono! --Abby Omination 02:18, 15 July 2012 (BST)

OOOooooo A puzzle box? Is that anything like a rubix cube? God I hope not, last time I completed on of those a entity of unspeakable evil was released from its millions year slumber. And I have avoided buying anything from Walmart since. --MeesoSorry 17:35, 15 July 2012 (BST)

Hey, I was only resting my thirty eyes! I've told you a million times, Meeso. --Abby Omination 03:10, 16 July 2012 (BST)

Anyways...On a more O13 vs AZDC matter...I see Abby and James are dead. That's a shame. In that case...Meeso! Jack! Come on! Gimme a real time fight! I'll be waiting! Hopefully I actually log in on time this time! :D --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ ^{#nerftemplatedsigs} 02:23, 15 July 2012 (BST)

Um, ok? An infection concerns me how? I dabble in Death Culting. An infection doesn't exactly stops me. --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ ^{#nerftemplatedsigs} 15:14, 15 July 2012 (BST)

And why would I care about stopping you? (It's not exactly like you're going anywhere to begin with, either =/) --Abby Omination 18:36, 15 July 2012 (BST)

An eye for an eye makes the whole world blind, Abby. Since we're both swaying there, Abby, why don't you ask your teammates to come kill me? Of course, if you do that, I'll bet O13 will find them a few hours later. --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ ^{#nerftemplatedsigs} 01:56, 17 July 2012 (BST)

The only thing I ask of my dear colleagues is the odd slice of pie and the address of a good hairstylist. For we are all equals in the eyes of Rando. Except you. You and your blasphemous gambler must pay the price in pies of blood! BLOOD I say! *noms* --Abby Omination 04:38, 17 July 2012 (BST)

I thought it was a funny idea so I wandered by and trenched our good friend Jason yesterday...I'm still waiting for a visit from one of the other OrgXIII elves. I'm not even hiding (not that I'm any good at it as Abby, I'm sure, would be happy to attest). --MeesoSorry 20:02, 17 July 2012 (BST)

Don't worry, Meeso. Last night, O13 knew you checked in at the Bubwith Hotel after killing me. But you lived 'cause none of us had ammo or AP. So don't think we don't know where you are this time, Meeso. ;) --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ ^{#nerftemplatedsigs} 21:43, 17 July 2012 (BST)

Rando's protection is real subtle like that. --Abby Omination 21:51, 17 July 2012 (BST)

If you kill me you will only be unwittingly helping me. The one thing you did not take account for was my defensive plans that takes advantage of your plans (the only other group to have underestimated these defensive "take advantage" tactics was Skynet..I know! They have a habit of doing that right?!). After all, killing with a borrowed knife is so much more better than doing things yourself. ;) --MeesoSorry 21:53, 17 July 2012 (BST)

I see. So you're killing zeds too this week, hm? Well, you know where I am. Come get some. I'm talking to you, Axe. Though if you wanna bring your friends, I won't mind. B-) --Abby Omination 22:09, 17 July 2012 (BST)

This is probably all something I should add on Lamport's page...But I'm too lazy to be bothered. --MeesoSorry 22:11, 17 July 2012 (BST)

I've told you before. I'm nice until you either piss me off/annoy me, or if someone else pisses me off to the point where everyone faces my wrath. Almost every drama I'm sucked into aren't began by me, but I'll sure as hell end it. --Abby Omination 22:13, 17 July 2012 (BST)

You guys honestly don't think I know where Meeso ran, huh? Well. Your lost. ;) --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ ^{#nerftemplatedsigs} 22:37, 17 July 2012 (BST)

Never said I didn't believe you, only that you are playing right into my plans per Stratagem 13547B subsection 3. We're prepared for your overcading and PKings. --MeesoSorry 22:41, 17 July 2012 (BST)

You're unintentionally helping us. Just like Sammi L. They unintentionally did the exact same thing you're doing right now, but AZDC took advantage of it. Sammi L tucked tail and ran away that one time though, as soon as they noticed everything they did was being taken advantage of.--Abby Omination 22:42, 17 July 2012 (BST)

Meeso, enjoy your dirtnap outside Cridge Alley. And Abby. Do you even know who runs Sammy? 'Cause you know the player behind Sammy, and I don't think she'll like you talking about her behind her back, mate. Also, all of you. Just keep coming over to Luch and kill me while I'm a zed, yes? Just come at me, and only me. I'll stay right where I am. At Luch Road. Let's see how many Headshots you all can pull off before dying. If you each reach five, I'll give you something special. ;) --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ ^{#nerftemplatedsigs} 22:48, 17 July 2012 (BST)

Carrie runs Sammi L, and I always assume someone will be reading what I say about them. Hi Carrie! Hope you didn't mind that shave Meeso's alt gave your alt! Anyways, "Buddhadamn, Chen, this pie is Mongol-butcherin' tasty!, another one of the Thirty Six Strategems. --Abby Omination 23:01, 17 July 2012 (BST)

Do you even know what the Thirty-Six Strategems are? Some folks say Zhuge Liang wrote them. Others say it was written by someone eons before his time, and claim Sun Bin wrote them. There really is no confirmed author for it, though the writings of Sun Tzu 's Art of War does make references to the Thirty-Six Strategems. --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ ^{#nerftemplatedsigs} 23:09, 17 July 2012 (BST)

I don't mind that Abby talked about me...wait, I guess I should clarify. I am ALSO Carrie Cutter. Can we talk more about dead Chinese guys and their various tomes of knowledge?! --MeesoSorry 23:11, 17 July 2012 (BST)

"Do not pursue Lu Bu", yet another one of the Thirty Six Strategems. --Abby Omination 23:13, 17 July 2012 (BST)

But I'm Meeso, so where does that leave us? -- _{Org XIII} ^Alts 23:15, 17 July 2012 (BST)

A sexy stew of multiple personalities...BTW If we're quoting Art of War let me do one..."Listen to me. Governments they come, they go. But the McDonalds... they last for eva!" - Wesley Snipes --MeesoSorry 23:18, 17 July 2012 (BST)

Wait a second. If Rob Oppenheimer capped Carrie, and Kirsty shot Meeso then does that mean you shot yourself... twice?! Then there can only be ONE logical conclusion from this! Radical MUST DIE! --Abby Omination 23:21, 17 July 2012 (BST)

Hey, what did I- --RadicalWhig 23:22, 17 July 2012 (BST)

NO! SHUSH! I will claim your scalp for Rando, Whig! As the Thirty Six Strategems say, "Fuck tha police, comin' straight from tha' underground". --Abby Omination 23:23, 17 July 2012 (BST)

Can I call you Cairsteeso Cutty then? --Abby Omination 00:20, 18 July 2012 (BST)

On a different matter other than all of us trolling each other...You guys got a forum or something? We've an 11 day event beginning on the 21st and since you're in the area, perhaps we can set aside all silliness and work at something a bit more fun. We can go back to shooting at each other after this event. Interested? --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ ^{#nerftemplatedsigs} 23:54, 17 July 2012 (BST)

Might want to contact the FoD. They're the ones interested and better at killaging (kill-pillaging). "What is love?" ~Thirty Six Strategems. "Baby don't hurt me." ~ Thirty Six Strategems again. --Abby Omination 23:58, 17 July 2012 (BST)

Damn you, Jack. I thought AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAZDC had left the area or I would have kept hiding. :( -- _{Org XIII} ^Alts 23:20, 19 July 2012 (BST)

"Keepin' it real.", as the Thirty Six Strategems say. --Abby Omination 00:54, 20 July 2012 (BST)

As the prophet Dave Chappelle hath spoke, "Sometimes keepin' it real goes wrong." -- _{Org XIII} ^Alts 23:05, 20 July 2012 (BST)

Butthurt please don't serious

(above header by Abby Omination)
You guys should be ashamed of yourselves. Killing a newbie? That's despicable. --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ ^{#nerftemplatedsigs} 23:25, 19 July 2012 (BST)

Did you hear that Kirsty and Cake? Axe is calling you guys noobs! :P --Abby Omination 00:49, 20 July 2012 (BST)

I said "a newbie", not "newbies". There is a difference, and killing a Lv4 character? That is really low. You shouldn't kill anything lower than Lv7 or 8. That's just not cool. I had high hopes for your group, but you just shattered that with the death of a low level character. Killing low levels really makes you no better than the rest of the classless PKer wannabes in Malton. --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ ^{#nerftemplatedsigs} 01:46, 20 July 2012 (BST)

1) You're primarily a death-cultist/PKer group. The moment your noob signed up to a group whose playstyle involves getting killed a lot, he accepted the risks that come with a dangerous job. Deal with it.

2) True, perhaps noob-tipping is a tad unkind, as is most griefing, but you make it sound like we're zerging or textraping. The former is an allegation you have thrown around easily, so forgive me if I discount your outrage.

3) Actually quoting the 36 Stratties this time, we did pilfer the shit out of your newbie goat. You should be happy we're giving you a battle of wits :)

4) You got owned. I'm going to drink in your tears and butthurt. Mmmmm.... almost as good as pie.--Abby Omination 02:04, 20 July 2012 (BST)

1) Wrong. All members have complete freedom to do whatever they want, and as such, we're not primarily DCist/PKer. We're primarily everything, it's just more members choose to DC/PK. Of all members, 2 are pro-survivors, 1 is pro-zombie, 1 is pro-PKer, 1 jumps between survivor and PKer, and the rest are always jumping between PKer, DCist, and zombie.

2) Point one example where I have accused anyone of zerging without evidence to back it up. There are none. There are instances of me passing along someone else's claims (Colette Hart's initial suspicions of FoD), and claims of "taking advantage" of zergs (OW vs CAPD), but there are no reports of me ever calling anybody out for zerging.

3) Taking advantage of a newbie is not taking advantage of anything. Rather, that's just you throwing away all sense of pride and letting you wave your e-peen around to claim you killed somebody who can't even fight back.

4) Your group is only half the size of O13. Of course it'll be more difficult to find any of you. A bigger group means you'll have more casualties, and you know that as well as I do. A smaller group is tougher to track. If you're all high and mighty, why don't you all come gunning after me, and only me. Then we'll see who is harder to track. Seems fair to you, right? 4 on 1? Oh wait, I forgot. You want the advantage of a smaller number. Guess you're too scared to be the bigger group. --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ ^{#nerftemplatedsigs} 02:36, 20 July 2012 (BST)

1,2) Conceded. 3,4) Lolwut? That makes no sense whatsoever.--Abby Omination 02:56, 20 July 2012 (BST)

3, 4 makes enough sense. You're just not smart enough to see it. Lemme break it down in simpler terms for your small walnut sized brain. 3) Killing somebody who can't fight back on their own is not taking advantage of anything. 4) 4 on 1. O13 only suffered the most casualties 'cause we're a bigger group. There's more of us to hunt. So let's cut it down a bit. 4 on 1. Leave all other Nobodies out, and just gun for me. I'll even tell all Nobodies to ignore you and just leave you for me. Or are you scared that you'll have a higher casualty rate if you agree to such terms? ;) --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ ^{#nerftemplatedsigs} 03:09, 20 July 2012 (BST)

I do love icing. Especially when its whipped. James Slimm 03:29, 20 July 2012 (BST)

You know it's true for all survivor-survivor conflicts. The smaller group has the hunting advantage, and the larger group has the support advantage. PS: I'm actually very calm right now. Don't get me wrong. I'm not losing my cool. If I was, you would have noticed with the change in dialect, mates. --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ ^{#nerftemplatedsigs} 03:35, 20 July 2012 (BST)

*whippsht* *wha-crack*.--Abby Omination 03:39, 20 July 2012 (BST)

You know it's true, the group numbers thing. Also, I'm not lying about the dialect thing neither. Ask anybody who has ever truly seen me pissed off. My dialect turns from this normal one...into...Well. Slang, slang, slang, and short term writing all over the place. :") --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ ^{#nerftemplatedsigs} 04:09, 20 July 2012 (BST)

Lemme know when it happens so I can frolic in your tears. James Slimm

*Yawns* You're gonna need to try harder than that. --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ ^{#nerftemplatedsigs} 04:39, 20 July 2012 (BST)

He's tuckered out from flooding Joe Noxious' coffin, J4mes. Let's give his eyes a few days to recharge, k?--Abby Omination 05:04, 20 July 2012 (BST)

If it bleeds... 03:53, 20 July 2012 (BST)

This is an acceptable summary of the events thus far.--Abby Omination 04:26, 20 July 2012 (BST)

Wowsa, text wall. I agree with Axe on the group numbers, the more there are the easier they are to find. For example I have no doubt you have killed us more; however, we have within a 24 hour (or so) period killed 75% of your group (If I'm missing any of you, please respond with profile links and current locations, thx). I disagree on the low level kills. No one gives a damn when 100s of a level 1 zombies get headshot by level 43 survivors, so what's good enough for zombies is good enough for survivors. However, I ultimately stand the by the one truth of PKing: When I PK you, it's funny as hell; When you PK me, you are an ass. -- _{Org XIII} ^Alts 23:14, 20 July 2012 (BST)

That and pie is so superior to cake it is worth killing folks over :) --Abby Omination 23:43, 20 July 2012 (BST)

Might just be me...

but the double redirects for the subpage talk pages (like talk:AAAAA/rules) don't work for me. The first redirect works, but I just see the second. I can click it, but it doesn't automatically forward me. I assume it's either just me or the wiki doesn't like the double redirect. -- _{Org XIII} ^Alts 09:12, 21 July 2012 (BST)