Talk:Dead Bunnies

Please note that reponses from somebody purporting to be from a Dead Bunny can, and will likely appear antagonistic. Anything posted should not be seen as an admission of guilt, merely that we don't care what you think of us and it seems to wind you up. Remember, you posted on our page. --Roorgh 08:45, 28 April 2009 (BST)

An invitation for Mall Tour '09

Dead Bunnies are hereby invited to partake in Mall Tour '09. It will be kicking off in 2 weeks time. The tour is being coordinated on barhah.com (public forum won't be going visible until later this week. Feel free to pm me there or on brainstock (or via my talk page) if you wish to come along for some bra!nz and destruction! --Johnny Bass 17:34, 5 January 2009 (UTC)

we love brainz! --Nayrb702 07:25, 9 January 2009 (UTC)

Sounds like good fun to me as well! Stepdown 14:00, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

Great to have you guys aboard! I've already seen quite a few of you in action over in Shearbank. BARHAH! --Johnny Bass 22:33, 20 January 2009 (UTC)

The Great Suburb Group Massacre, 2009

	Group Confirmed.
	This group was confirmed active. Thank you for your reply.

Thanks for your reply, and sorry if this seems like a stupid question. Linkthewindow  Talk  23:18, 13 February 2009 (UTC)

We're still active, just finished a big nomfest in Santlerville an hour ago! Stepdown 23:32, 25 February 2009 (UTC)

Thanks! Linkthewindow  Talk  20:36, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

Question

Where is the proof for agent rubber piggy and Nehcrum zerging? or indeed the others that you place on your page that are not on the zerg liste? or indeed that they "worked" together with zergers? --mo ヽ(´ー｀)ﾉ ^{MCM MOB DB} 12:59, 27 April 2009 (BST)

Proof added --M4rduK 00:29, 28 April 2009 (BST)

All that Iwit shows is beavers working closely together which is the norm and other people in the same building who happen to be active at the same time, you had struck at the same time so those people would have worked out your MO, one Iwit does not a case for zerging make, hell it took us showing you your own "team mates" zerging multipul times before you sort of admitted it, why have you not put your own bunnys on the list? --mo ヽ(´ー｀)ﾉ ^{MCM MOB DB} 00:55, 28 April 2009 (BST)

Keep spinning it...we both know what really happened. Do I really need to break it down for everyone again? --M4rduK 01:05, 28 April 2009 (BST)

yes break it down then, the beavers where in IRC with many people, non of whom where "zergers" there are plenty of witness's to state this fact, can you say the same? --mo ヽ(´ー｀)ﾉ ^{MCM MOB DB} 01:11, 28 April 2009 (BST)

Ok...just for you because you're so darn special though! First we have to correct a couple of fallacies that you have already loaded into the conversation. First, no one just "happened" to be in the building at the same time - it was an organized attack. Second, there was no MO to figure out, WE were holding the building not attacking. We had been camping out in it for a couple of days.

Now for the actual explanation of what is taking place in that iwitness report (as if you don't already know the facts of what happened haha). The report shows an organized and pre-planned attack on the building with a specific tactic - combat reviving. The entire Hall was revived in under 4 minutes (30+ zombies if I remember correctly).

Just so the facts are clear - a group of 9+ humans arrived at the Hall carrying over 30 syringes between them, installed a generator, fueled it, revivified 30+ zombies, and dumped them all. All of this in a period of 4 minutes.

And you're suggesting that these 9 people just happened to all show up at the same time, all carrying a bunch of syringes, a genny, and fuel, and proceeded to all use the exact same tactic, and clear an entire building of zombies in under 4 minutes - this was all just coincidence? Please...that's a pitifully pathetic argument.

At the *very* least, a group of Beavers, along with 3+ known zergers (Tommy2times, mrscientistman, and blindedwithscience) and a couple of other humans pre-planned an attack (the time and the strategy) and then carried it out in unison with each other. This is undeniable to anyone with an ounce of logic and no matter how much you try to spin it, everyone who sees the iwitness report and reads the explanation knows the truth of it. You'd be better off just owning up to what was done and moving on.

To address a couple of other points you made. Is it impossible to believe that someone could be in 2 IRC channels at once or on 2 servers? I hope not, because it is very possible...as you well know. Please don't try to further confuse the issue by throwing nonsense at it. As for my "team mates" zerging - We did learn that 2 (possibly 3) of our members had zerged at some point soon after the group formed. Then we were finally shown proof that it happened we acknowledged it and they were reprimanded for it they assured us that it would not happen again. To my knowledge they have not done so again since that incident. Are the Beavers big enough to own up to their mistakes as well? --M4rduK 01:45, 28 April 2009 (BST)

Actually that's exactly what you should believe, it's extremely common and zombies have been doing it as an answer to the AP imbalance for years. Strike Team. Dunno about the zergers part but the rest is extremely common.--Karek^maps?! 03:08, 29 April 2009 (BST)

You're joking, right? groups do that all the time. Something like that is just a generic demonstration of good timing. I've seen it hundreds of times. That's what makes them groups. Don't know what you guys are doing if you think that execution of timing was cheating. D^ANCED^ANCER^EVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 13:07, 17 May 2009 (BST)

So you agree with us? We finally got through to someone!!! DanceDanceRevolution just agreed with us that the beavers were working with a group of zergs as a group and that they timed their attack together! That's all we ever claimed...it's good to know that it hasn't fallen on deaf ears. :D --M4rduK 13:41, 17 May 2009 (BST)

How unimaginably hilarious... I guess you might as well add an equally poor response to Karek's comment now, too. And while I'm here I might add that your new 'zerg proof' is so poor that I'm considering creating an new account, send him to Santlerville, kill a zombie, and count down the seconds before you label it as a zerg account of 'someone'. D^ANCED^ANCER^EVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 13:46, 17 May 2009 (BST)

Wait, so you're not agreeing now? Your previous post clearly said that the iwitness of the Hall retake showed a group working together using good timing. That is exactly what we have been saying the entire time. I fail to see where we're disagreeing. Also, we didn't label the zergs in that iwitness as zergs...the Beavers did. Those are people that THEY have reported as zergs in the past. We're just pointing out that they are now working very closely with the people that they themselves have labeled as zergs. --M4rduK 14:00, 17 May 2009 (BST)

Just to clarify some of the details. It's ['your' list] that claims Tommy2times, mrscientistman, and blindedwithscience are zergs. The very same list that Calista had no trouble running to when she was whinging about zergs in the bunnies. Our point is that these very same people who had no trouble bleating about the entire Dead Bunnies being zergs and whining about it on the radio and spray painting it wherever we went or simply saying it when they wanted to perform their cowardly combat revives, these very same people have no issue about sharing space with a bunch of zergs and coordinating with them. Of course coordinating with another group isn't cheating, it's just fucking hypocritical when you do it with a bunch of zergs (again by your list and your rules) after bitching non-stop about us for so very long. --Roorgh 14:26, 17 May 2009 (BST)

I've never been with the Dribbling Beavers in my life, nor did I ever support their enormously overbloated zerg search. It is just your circumstancial 'evidence' is getting poorer by the upload. D^ANCED^ANCER^EVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 14:52, 17 May 2009 (BST)

So then why have you not added my submission below to your list? "it's just fucking hypocritical"! --MoonShine 02:45, 18 May 2009 (BST)

Because that iwitness does not show those people working together - it merely shows that they were in the same area at the same time. By your logic everyone shown in that iwitness was in the same area, so they're all zergs then? See, we have higher standards for callimg people zergs than at silly vanity circle jerk forums. We require better proof than "their names are similar" or "they were both in the same area at the same time" - our proof shows CLEARLY that the zergs were cooperating with each other, which is exactly what makes them zergs! --M4rduK 20:46, 18 May 2009 (BST)

You do know that you can check which room in irc people are in dont you? and yes the beavers had a co ordinated CR thing going on your point is what? we had and will continue to CR but all the iwit shows is ONE beaver cring with some others? he might have been checking the place at the time and noticed the genny was up and running and took advantage of it.....that Iwit proves nothing and i'll thank you not to try to be condescending to me, you and your bunnies really have poor inter personal skills --mo ヽ(´ー｀)ﾉ ^{MCM MOB DB} 02:07, 28 April 2009 (BST)

Now you're just embarrassing yourself...YOU do know that people can be on more than one IRC server at a time right? Do you have a way to see every IRC server a person is on? And of course it would be impossible to organize something via AIM or googletalk...because whatever IRC server you're on must be the center of the universe and no one else would dare to discuss something in a place that you can't personally see them...

I'm making a (very) small attempt at keeping this civil, but it's difficult when you present such patently absurd arguments such as "A discussion did not take place on the IRC server that I was on at the time, therefor the conversation never took place at all". --M4rduK 19:25, 28 April 2009 (BST)

Fine I admit I made a mistake about IRC and servers, but still that one iwit means nothing, nothing at all, some beavers refresh often and patrol areas and you get a message on the screen when a place is lit up, this is my last message here as you really dont care that the iwit means nothing and simply want to cause more drama - --mo ヽ(´ー｀)ﾉ ^{MCM MOB DB} 00:12, 29 April 2009 (BST)

Not the brightest bulbs in the box are you?

You guys are either incredibly stupid or total masochists. Accusing people of zerging without showing any evidence and expecting others to act on these baseless accusations will probably get you griefed into oblivion. Let's not forget the whole internet stalking thing. Oh well, another couple nails in your coffin eh? Good show, Bunnies. --Amber Waves of Pain 13:37, 27 April 2009 (BST)

Who the hell are you, and why should we care? Did you not see the lovely graphs we made for your edification? --Roorgh 00:04, 28 April 2009 (BST)

OH NOES WE WILL GET GRIEF!!!! THIS MEANS WE SHOULD IGNORE THE ZERGING RITE? Your threats and accusations mean nothing to us. This can be spun however you want, but there is still no explanation for the iwitness report that I have added to the page...no explanation other than zerging that is...lol. Feel free to spin it some more! It's fun to watch you guys squirm. :D --M4rduK 00:35, 28 April 2009 (BST)

Roorgh, I'm a player in Urban Dead. It's a massive, multiplayer online role playing game. You shouldn't act so surprised when you find other people that play it. I've been playing for over a year now. I play 3 characters, all of whom kill/eat zergs, only one of which requires evidence to do so. I've lead and helped others lead and organise a death cult, one of Malton's most respected hordes and a couple PKer groups. I have a small army of stalkers and I'm a friend of Calista Griffin's and a number of other Dribbling Beavers through channels that your tiny mind obviously can't fathom. Who the hell are you?

M4rduk, I didn't make any accusations or threats. I was merely stating as a matter of fact that a) you're either stupid or acting like dumb fucks for publicity (ie. you're asking for this sort of response,) and b) you'll get griefed for it. Apparently, you're paranoid chicken shits, too. lol? --Amber Waves of Pain 06:35, 28 April 2009 (BST)

Other people play this game?? M4rduK you lied to me! Oh and Amber, when I post on your page feel to ask who the hell I am too :-) until then, that description doesn't really indicate any substantial reason why we should be bothered by what you're posting. --Roorgh 08:45, 28 April 2009 (BST)

one i-witness that shows nothing. nils jackson was in st. c's and went to investigate. nehcrum probably noticed it as well. you know, you do see lights go on in other bldgs nearby, it's a game feature. frankly, you are just upset that we caught three of your members zerging. caught red handed with irrefutable proof that you initially denied. once public opinion turned against you, with the zerging and the obscene radio spam your members were using against us, you got pissed off and then, after the five or six times the teenangels cr'd you out of hall, you finally noticed some, not all, of them were on the zerg list. yes, you are so very bright. you don't get to have it both ways, three proven and listed zergs in YOUR GROUP. but, a couple of beavers are in the same bldg and suddenly we are zergs? if that was the standard of proof for zerging, half of malton could be convicted. btw, they were originally listed, in retaliation, by the suspected alt of yet another zerger. but, the teenangels are not part of our group and we do not control their actions. the zergers in your group however are your responsibility, one that you have consistently dodged responsibility for. you never provided any proof that the zerging has stopped, you said the problem was "taken care of", just like you said that the personal harassment of me was not cool and that it wouldn't happen again. you are the only one who is squirming here, m4rduk, you have some of the best experience ignoring zerging. you do it everyday when you act like what we've already proved never actually happened.

so, what about your members internet stalking me? [1]--Calista griffin 04:03, 28 April 2009 (BST)

Is that you Calista? We approve of the ears but the overall opinion is you'd look better with fuller eyebrows. --Roorgh 08:45, 28 April 2009 (BST)

Not only is it pervy and weird, it's also against Twitter's policy on privacy:

Twitter Support said:

Posting someone else's private identifying information on Twitter is considered a breach of privacy. If your private information has been posted by another person, we will take immediate action to remove it. Private information is: credit card information social security number private phone numbers otherwise non-public or unattainable information.

Source

I had a quick poke around Myspace and couldn't find that image on a non-passworded profile.

Oh, and here's the no - longer broken link that Amber posted. Linkthewindow  Talk  08:51, 28 April 2009 (BST)

Regarding the accusations of "stalking" (lol) - it was relatively easy to find calista's alternate usernames based on info that she herself was posting. I wasn't the one that spotted the connection, but from what I understand it required little more than a google search to make the connection and another google search to find her myspace page (the pics are still on the myspace page and it is not password protected - ie, the pics are very public). Does being observant and using a couple of google searches count as stalking? Hardly. Furthermore, at no point did we ever say who the pictures were of or where they came from. Calista chose to reveal that they were photos of herself and Linkthewindow revealed where they came from in the post right above this (I can only assume he knew the source due to having to listen to people whine at him). Just to reiterate, the extent of what took place was 2 google searches and posting a completely un-identified picture. The topic would have been instantly forgotten by everyone who saw it had not this big fuss been made. We never in ANY way made any public connection between the picture and who it was. People really need to get a better grasp of the concept that the internet is a PUBLIC place. If you post pictures on the internet, they are public (*especially* on myspace and the likes). --M4rduK 16:32, 29 April 2009 (BST)

Zerg Reporting

Dear Dead Bunnies,

I have noticed your new zerg list and would like to commend you for the effort the current zerg list does nothing to punish people who work in collusion with zergers whether they intend too or not, in it's present form it is an exercise in futility and does nothing to bring these cheaters to the public eye. We desperately need a list like yours. I would like to make a report of zergers to add to your list. I have been reviewing this iwitness which also happens to be on your page and noticed something: It is dated 04-15-09 comparing it to this zerg liste update dated 04-08-09 i notice that one Nayrb702 is present he is a known zerger and by the highlighting appears to be working in a co-ordinated fashion with the following people:

• Danish Bunny
• cannot sleep
• zombiegirly
• ExitBit2
• dead welsh bunny
• forteagle
• bumrocks
• hdrider
• robbie77
• RaSpewTin
• M4rduK
• Quick Quack
• Raff Raff
• Stepdown

On your main page you state "The following is a list of known zergers working in Santlerville. The list also includes people who work closely with zergers - we make no distinction between the two." so i believe there would be no quarrels in adding these cheaters to the list as well. I would however like to warn you "They should be considered armed (with proxies) and extremely ghey." <3 MoonShine 12:15, 28 April 2009 (BST)

Thank you for your report! We take zerging very seriously here at the Dead Bunnies and make every effort to keep our group clear of it. As I have previously stated (a couple of times actually) we do acknowledge that a small number of our members WERE zerging! The bastards... Nayrb702 was one of our members that was previously reported - because obviously it's not acceptable to have more than one person in a group with the same real life name...I mean, come on that would just be silly. Anyway, we kicked all of the other Bryans out of the group and they have not been seen in Santlerville since well before the zerg combat revive rush on April the 15th. That being the case, I consider the case closed on this report - but thank you for your diligence! Perhaps if you applied the same diligence and acute investigative prowess to your own group you could solve the mysterious zerg combat reviving case going on there... --M4rduK 12:40, 28 April 2009 (BST)

Doesn't change the fact that they are still on the zerg liste much the same as the "zerg combat revivers" you seem to have an unhealthy obsession over. Frankly your word counts for didly squat there are procedures in place to rectify this and until you follow them you are holding a double standard. --MoonShine 12:58, 28 April 2009 (BST)

We're under no obligation to conform to the silly rules of some forum that you frequent in order to prove anything. OH NOES YOU PUT US ON A LIST! So what? Just to set the record straight though, we DID have some of our members go to your silly forum and follow YOUR protocol to be removed from the almighty list. They were not removed - we just got the run around. We admitted to our mistakes, cleaned up the problem, and followed your protocol (to no effect). You, on the other hand, are still in massive denial despite evidence that would be clear to a 6 year old. Whose word counts for diddly squat? Please continue to circle jerk on your forum and make more lists. They seem to be very effective at.....wait, what's the point of the list again? Oh right...it accomplishes *nothing*...lol. --M4rduK 19:58, 28 April 2009 (BST)

I never get included on any list! Booooo! --Roorgh 12:42, 28 April 2009 (BST)

Please accept my humble apologies but i cannot bring myself to accuse someone of zerging if there is no evidence backing it --MoonShine 12:58, 28 April 2009 (BST)

I should be on the top of this list, I am far more famous than Stepdown, that little hobgoblin always steals my thunder!--Rottentinfish 20:09, 28 April 2009 (BST)

Caught Zerging!

You can't wriggle out of it this time. Here is picture evidence of bunny zergs in action!

and here is the proof regarding AiR and his 3 alts! --Roorgh 17:27, 4 May 2009 (BST)

As you can clearly see they are stalking prey in these pictures, damn they're black hearts! Action should be taken against these crazy bunnies!

Okay, this is getting really stupid.

I want everyone to sit down, shut up and listen what I'm about to say. I don't want to hear any bickering about the points I make, I'm not 'starting a dialogue' or opening this up for discussion. You're all going to listen, take on board what I have to say, and stop this stupid shit.

Firstly to the Beavers. You were shown to be cheating, you need to suck it up and move on instead of crying that other people cheat. Yes, some Bunnies were caught using multiple accounts, but you are VERY aware that they have been dealt with and no longer participate in any Bunny related gameplay. You ignore any evidence which proves your players were involved in badness, but are the first and the loudest when it comes to insulting others after the situation has been resolved. You need to stop with this self-righteous defenders-of-all-that-is-good-and-right mentality. You're a group of people playing an ONLINE GAME, not actually zombie hunters fighting a crusade against the undead. It would do you all well to remember that once in a while and stop treating this game like a representation of your lives.

Secondly, Calista. I didn't have anything to do with your "personal" information being put onto twitter or wherever it went. But as I understand it, looking at a public myspace page and then showing things from it does not constitute 'unattainable information.' Do I think it was morally right? Absolutely not. I also think it was dumb as hell and had nothing to do with the game. Is it illegal? Not by a long shot. It's equivalent to wearing a name badge then getting upset when people use your name.

Thirdly, Bunnies. Can we stop with all this childish shit please? You know I've made my feelings clear about this in the past. Every dumb thing that you guys do goes to support the Beaver claim that we're a bunch of cheating, underhanded dickheads. I joined the game because I thought it would be fun, I didn't sign up to get dragged into some retarded turf-war between two groups who seem to have lost sight of what the game is about.

So in closing, can every stop being so annoying and can we ALL get back to playing the game for fun? I think we'd all benefit from it. --Jason Stafam 12:22, 28 April 2009 (BST)

I've worked with Jason Statham --newton pippin 13:36, 28 April 2009 (BST)

Good on you. D^ANCED^ANCER^EVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 13:40, 28 April 2009 (BST)

No, you're wrong, Jason Stafam. You don't even know what it takes to prove someone is a zerg. So no one takes what you are saying on that score seriously. Plus you know that your friends went through the trouble, which they say was actually very easy - which tells me something, of linking two of my alts that had no public link. Also, if you, in your blinding fit of integrity, have such a hard time with your friends' actions, why are you still with them? You seem to have a problem with basic reading comprehension as well, LinktheWindow suggested it was illegal, not I. It is extremely unethical in that it was meant to intimidate me. In a game, because the Bunnies aren't getting what they want. How charming. The merry go round we've been on is this: We prove that the Bunnies are doing something unethical/against the rules, The Bunnies get mad and do something off the reservation and howl OMG UR ZERGING, We roll our eyes.--Calista griffin 15:48, 28 April 2009 (BST)

See, this is exactly what I'm talking about. Why do you guys insist on perpetuating this stupid childishness between the two teams? Why can't you move on? The only reason I signed up to this wiki in the first place was to tell everyone to grow up and stop behaving like little kids, if you can't do that, I pity you. And speaking directly to you now Calista, you're supposed to be an intelligent adult woman. Perhaps it was time you began acting like one and took the first step by giving all of this a rest.

Oh, and as for my integrity. I don't see you leaving your group after the iwitness report showed them to be using the same tactics you have such a problem with. So how about you drop that straw man? :) --Jason Stafam 16:13, 28 April 2009 (BST)

because it's not true and because there is no straw man, nice try, though.--Calista griffin 16:22, 28 April 2009 (BST)

Jason, if that's your only motive for coming onto the wiki then you won't be here for long. It doesn't work like that, people will always act like kids here. And secondly, less than a year ago the Beavers were the most effective anti-zerg group I've ever seen and I would find it very hard to believe they had sunk so low as to demonstrate such double standards. I could be wrong, but it would take solid proof to make me think otherwise. D^ANCED^ANCER^EVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 22:44, 28 April 2009 (BST)

Bloody hell, you think you'd be pleased somebody has bothered to look at your myspace page at all... --Roorgh 16:29, 28 April 2009 (BST)

All of the drama on this page seems to be related to the zerg list that was added. There is a simple way to end the drama. The beavers can admit that some of their members were working with zergers - case closed. Further more, we'll happily remove their names from the list if we are told that the members involved have been reprimanded and that they won't be doing it again. Until then, the list (and apparently the drama) remains. We have the proof and it is clear what happened. --M4rduK 23:18, 28 April 2009 (BST)

Alternatively you can drop the issue until you have more proof that is also more substantial than the one iwitness presented here and actually prove a pattern of behavior. I'd say it would be smart to stop some of the other stuff too but we both know that's not gonna happen until you get bored of the game you're playing which isn't the game they're playing.--Karek^maps?! 03:27, 29 April 2009 (BST)

We have just as much, or more, proof than has been used to convict others of zerging. It's a two-way street. --M4rduK 16:34, 29 April 2009 (BST)

I'm not sure about your MOB zombie's name, Karek. A zombie called Mardul seems a bit suspect to me! --Stepdown 17:21, 29 April 2009 (BST)

That doesn't stop the fact that I worked with Jason Statham --newton pippin 00:44, 29 April 2009 (BST)

Was he wearing a shirt?--Jason Stafam 01:24, 29 April 2009 (BST)

You're not the fluffer for the Speedo scenes are you? --Stepdown 17:24, 29 April 2009 (BST)

He did have some kind of shirt on. And really bad hair extensions. He also kept throwing chess pieces around. No Speedo's were harmed, Stepdown ;) --newton pippin 02:15, 30 April 2009 (BST)

I call shenanigans. Statham would never cover up his dome, nor would he ever wear a shirt for longer than 30 seconds in a scene. You're a fraud, Pippin! --Jason Stafam 02:54, 30 April 2009 (BST)

All Kosher. No shenanigans, or fraudulant activity here. :) The Dome was covered, his shirt sometime stayed on and occassionally a bishop would fly past whilst he swore at Richie for winning another game of chess. --newton pippin 03:00, 30 April 2009 (BST)

Undeadite Call to Brainz...err...Armz

Hey we're currently in Heytown visiting (and eating) are old friends the Mad Caskers. Seeing as how you guys are about the same size as and in the same area as us, we thought you might enjoy joining us for the buffet, maybe the Beavers will try to come to their aid and we can beat up on your old rival as well.

Feel free to contact me on our Undeadites wiki or the Forum. Rnrarrrh!!!--El Coo Cooi 08:08, 2 May 2009 (BST)

Prepare to be disappointed then. We can't get a decent fight out of the beavers while taunting them from within 'their' suburb. If they can't combat revive whilst whining about zergs they don't seem to be interested. Your offer is tempting though, so you may very well hear from one of our older zombies at some point. --Roorgh 13:04, 2 May 2009 (BST)

It's a very tempting offer, will leave it to M4rduK to make a final decision. The mall's pretty dead at the moment anyway! --Stepdown 16:12, 2 May 2009 (BST)

Ooh oooh oooh! Zombie roadtrip? I call shotgun! (Yes, I'm aware of the irony)--Jason Stafam 18:14, 2 May 2009 (BST)

I'll sit on your lap, if it hasn't rotted away by now, and if you promise not to eat my shoulder when we're travelling ;-) Zharni 15:32, 3 May 2009 (BST)

Sounds like fun! It certainly can't be worse than sitting around the Mall and watching the Beavers not take it back...ever. We've moved down to Chaffey Alley PD for the time being and are currently enjoying the local brainz. There are still plenty of noms left though of you guys want to partake too. Let's get together and organize some brain nomming in Heytown. :D Hopefully the Mad Caskers are more entertaining than the Dribbling(ly slow) Beavers --M4rduK 22:08, 2 May 2009 (BST)

Well we've made it our mission to hammer the Caskers anytime we're in the neighborhood, as they're officially listed on our wiki as one of our arch enemies. We're going to be seeing all the sights in their territory so feel free to drop in and have a bite.--El Coo Cooi 23:18, 2 May 2009 (BST)

Mission Accomplished. Over the past 5 days every building in Heytown was ruined by the Bunnes and the Undeadites. :D --M4rduK 14:01, 8 May 2009 (BST)

The Dead Bunnies Surrender!

We Surrender!

No we bloody don't!

Brains

Bit fowl? With a hint of potato? Does that make me taste good? I somewhat wonder... --Alexander Abramov 10:15, 6 May 2009 (BST)

Candy and Chocolate diet if you please! Nothing better than Candy Chocolate brains! --Rottentinfish 18:27, 7 May 2009 (BST)

I see... so that's how they do it... wow... --Alexander Abramov 18:09, 8 May 2009 (BST)

Nobody wants to play with us :(

"#beaverslodge Don't React to the Bunnies on the Wiki"

lmao - translation = "every time we talk they prove us wrong...so quit talking!" --M4rduK 14:01, 8 May 2009 (BST)

It is most probably because you aren't worth the metagaming trauma you are trying to cause. That's definitely how it looks to the outside community. D^ANCED^ANCER^EVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 04:00, 10 May 2009 (BST)

Thank you for the compliment --Roorgh 07:35, 10 May 2009 (BST)

Ugh, I just lost the game. --Stepdown 09:37, 10 May 2009 (BST)

Does going to forums and repeatedly accusing us of being a zerg group based on the month old actions of 2 players count as metagaming as well? We tried to settle this in the game...with teeth and bullets - we're merely matching tactics so we can keep up! --M4rduK 14:08, 10 May 2009 (BST)

So that basically means your admitting you still zerg because you think they zerg? --Karek^maps?! 00:30, 11 May 2009 (BST)

That's exactly what he's saying. Why I only finished creating four new accounts last night. Three of them are now currently hunting you down. Don't worry though, I don't think I can actually keep track of more than fifteen accounts so I'm going to limit myself to those. Fifteen is enough for anybody though really isn't it? It isn't? well I suppose I could try making some more... --Roorgh 07:08, 11 May 2009 (BST)

I've personally got 800 zerg accounts. None of the other dead bunnies are holding the mall at all, they all left to have cake with their faithful companion cubes. (I'm being told it's delicious and moist.) It's all me using my 2000 zergs to stop you from taking it back. I log in from all pcs around the world to control my 50,000 zergs like an evil zombie dictator. Did I mention the 900 million zergs I'm using to control the mall? (Why is it whenever you're outmaneuvered or just overpowered, it's because the other side cheats? Nobody likes a sore loser.....)--Jason Stafam 19:01, 11 May 2009 (BST)

LOL karek, you should maybe google metagaming...because it doesn't mean zerging. :D --M4rduK 12:09, 11 May 2009 (BST)

If that's what you meant you worded it extremely poorly. It read very much like you were channeling Zeug there. --Karek^maps?! 20:07, 11 May 2009 (BST)

Dang it Stepdown I just lost the game too. --DTangent 00:02, 12 May 2009 (BST)

Practice what you preach

Didn't you guys bitch us out that we attacked the mall when you left? Well you didn't all leave. We still killed 15 of you. We had that strike planned for days. Just great luck I suppose. What I'm saying is... The UBCS isn't in town for two days, and you attack. Not gonna say anything.... hypocrites... --Haliman - Talk 15:35, 10 May 2009 (BST)

What the hell are you talking about? --Roorgh 16:27, 10 May 2009 (BST)

We were off in Heytown doing our thing, it took us about a week to ruin the whole place, and we're back. There is nothing hypocritical about it, we haven't jumped on the airwaves boasting about our victory over your group, which is the only point we objected to. We weren't boo-hooing about survivors retaking the mall once we left, that's to be expected.

Sorry if you feel cheated out of a fight, maybe if you spent less time planning you'd keep up with us ;) --Stepdown 18:58, 10 May 2009 (BST)

Indeed, we objected to you claiming our road trip as your victory. Honestly, you take one little vacation.... --Jason Stafam 19:26, 10 May 2009 (BST)

It should also be pointed out that we promised to return to Bunnyville after our vacation, and our itinerary was quite proudly displayed on the main page. Are you sure the timing of UBCS leaving town for a day or two was coincidence? --Roorgh 19:36, 10 May 2009 (BST)

Haha, how convenient! We sat in the mall for two weeks waiting for a response and when we finally leave we get "We were just about to kick your ass!". I wonder, is there any event that cannot be spun into a victory for the beavers and their pals? ;) --M4rduK 19:44, 10 May 2009 (BST)

Time to get on those radios folks! The Dead Bunnies went for another walk! Yet again we left our home The Dowdney Mall in Bunnyville unnatended! Time to start claiming we were kicked out!! Hey a hollow victory is a victory none the less! --Rottentinfish 12:04, 12 May 2009 (BST)

Containin' Monthly

You've been mentioned :P. --Haliman - Talk 19:25, 10 May 2009 (BST)

Link? --Roorgh 19:26, 10 May 2009 (BST)

Nevermind, you'd updated your post --Roorgh 19:27, 10 May 2009 (BST)

Excerpt from the premiere edition of UBCS Containin' Monthly, 9 May 2009: --DeadLeeErnest 15:52, 11 May 2009 (BST)

    "Locals are confused as to what to call revived Dead Bunnies members.
     'Look out, everyone! We're under attacked by bunnies!'"

I guess you can call us the Undead Bunnies? --DTangent 00:07, 12 May 2009 (BST)

In general, the confusion you describe is rather short-lived. --DeadLeeErnest 15:52, 11 May 2009 (BST)

Your mum

D^ANCED^ANCER^EVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 12:14, 11 May 2009 (BST)

Mum - why did you leave all those years ago? --Roorgh 12:35, 11 May 2009 (BST)

Whyyyyyyyyy! D^ANCED^ANCER^EVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 12:53, 11 May 2009 (BST)

Calista!! You got eyebrows! We approve! --Rottentinfish 12:50, 11 May 2009 (BST)

Santlerville, are you all gigantic pussies?

http://iwrecords.urbandead.info/05-17-09_2200hrs_PUBLIC/IN_74-28_BUILDING_OF_62__ef7-40e-ede.html

8 zombies attacking a building with 62 people in it (getting it down to 56 before running out of ap) counts as a zerg rush?

I know a lot of you are morons who cry wolf at the slightest sign of danger, but come on!

Don't be daft now, Jason. -Rddr

Hehe what did you expect from these sad losers?

Somebody has spraypainted AND THE ZERGERS ARE VICTORIOUS! onto a wall.

No! The Dead Bunnies were victorious dear Beavers, if you look again you will see we ruined the NT.....

--Rottentinfish 18:39, 19 May 2009 (BST)

Bunnies - idem quod Zergers. ;P -Rddr

Rddr idem quod Whiny Beaver

Seriously, at least the Beavers were fervent with their pathetics mewings. Put some effort in if you intend to play here. --Roorgh 15:37, 20 May 2009 (BST)

Rddr - Venimus, Vidimus, Vicimus. --Jason Stafam 17:58, 20 May 2009 (BST)

Jason's response was more than acceptable! Bravo, i say! (Though i think it's just "Veni, Vidi, Vici"). Roorgh - work on your Latin comebacks! Oh, i'm not a Beaver, and i'm not getting tied up in this debacle. I just like to mess around with you and generate a bit of lovely banter. :) XOXO-Rddr

Maybe Rddr ibidem Dribbling Beavers? Nice to see a touch of classical sophistication on our page! --Stepdown 14:31, 21 May 2009 (BST)

A dead wittle wabbit

I've no idear what your group is about. I Just stumbled upon this talk page and thought you might appreciate this sweet little graphic.

She's hot. --Stepdown 00:35, 20 May 2009 (BST)

I'd hit it. --Jason Stafam 17:49, 20 May 2009 (BST)

MOM! NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO --Rottentinfish 13:17, 21 May 2009 (BST)

Man, I told her not to leave my house so early in the morning, but she said she'd be able to miss the heavy traffic. I guess she didn't. D^ANCED^ANCER^EVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 13:19, 21 May 2009 (BST)