User talk:Nubis/001: Difference between revisions

From The Urban Dead Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
(→‎Quotetastic:: hahah thought you'd like this)
 
Line 12: Line 12:
<br>{{CallOut|Please don't imply my intentions, the overriding principle of this page, as you well know, is to assume good faith. |Iscariot}}<br>
<br>{{CallOut|Please don't imply my intentions, the overriding principle of this page, as you well know, is to assume good faith. |Iscariot}}<br>
Saving this for later.--{{User:Nubis/sig}} 13:36, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
Saving this for later.--{{User:Nubis/sig}} 13:36, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
<br>{{CallOut|I'm not the one using the admin pages for my own personal agenda. |Iscariot}}<br>


==The Meter==
==The Meter==

Latest revision as of 14:22, 7 May 2010

I guess one could say something about his behaviour with the Big Brother House drama, when he ruined the fun of many users by announcing the location of the building to the entire community through his signature after a heated discussion with me and other users --People's Commissar Hagnat talk mod 16:55, 7 January 2009 (UTC)

A few of your links don't makey sense (ex #7, do not need to be etc.). They should probably link to the proper archive. --  AHLGTG THE END IS NIGH! 21:51, 7 January 2009 (UTC)

When I click it it takes me here: UDWiki:Administration/Protections/Archive2008#Userspace. It's the Dec. protections page archive. ??? --– Nubis NWO 00:29, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
I changed the link to the correct one nubis... and i am surprised that the protection page archive is yearly, unlike deletion and vandalism which is done monthly. --People's Commissar Hagnat talk mod 00:36, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
Thanks, Hag. When I wrote this it was the current page. Sorry.--– Nubis NWO 00:37, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
Also, the protection page archive probably shouldn't be yearly. --– Nubis NWO 00:38, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
Question. Have you requested protection of the front page because A) You're still working on it. B) you want no one to comment on it. or C) You want to create a page that only sysop's can comment on? --RosslessnessWant a Location Image? 09:20, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
A and C mostly. I have no problems with anyone adding to the page, however, I do not wish to have to check through the history to see if anything has been taken off. I figure most people will use the talk page out of habit or courtesy though. I also want to provide a place for sysops to comment to me about the page and not worry about a flame war or trolling. I am very interested in their honest opinions. --– Nubis NWO 14:11, 8 January 2009 (UTC)

Quotetastic:


Start quote rb.gif Please don't imply my intentions, the overriding principle of this page, as you well know, is to assume good faith.   End quote rb.gif

-- Iscariot


Saving this for later.--– Nubis NWO 13:36, 11 January 2009 (UTC)

Start quote rb.gif I'm not the one using the admin pages for my own personal agenda.   End quote rb.gif

-- Iscariot


The Meter

Is a good touch to the page. Also, I cannot for the life of me remember which A/M case that the vote link is in. :/ --Mr. Angel, Help needed? 18:19, 29 May 2009 (BST)

Which vote link do you mean? He has had a lot of problems with a lot of votes. So anti-democracy! --– Nubis NWO 17:42, 30 May 2009 (BST)
This one, located here: "or negative comment on either sysops or other posters".--Mr. Angel, Help needed? 17:51, 30 May 2009 (BST)
This is the only thing that seems to fit. --  AHLGTG THE END IS NIGH! 17:59, 30 May 2009 (BST)
Honestly, if we went through all of his posts on admin pages we could find several examples of needless hostility against sysops. But that is a nice example. --– Nubis NWO 14:22, 1 June 2009 (BST)