User talk:Keira Bambini: Difference between revisions
From The Urban Dead Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
BobBoberton (talk | contribs) (New page: ==Welcome to the Wiki!== {{Welcomenewbie}} If you have any questions or need any help, feel free to drop by my talk page. Welcome to the Wiki! --~~~~) |
(Please only edit correct information) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
If you have any questions or need any help, feel free to drop by [[User_talk:BobBoberton|my talk page]]. Welcome to the Wiki! --{{User:BobBoberton/sig}} 21:15, 17 June 2009 (BST) | If you have any questions or need any help, feel free to drop by [[User_talk:BobBoberton|my talk page]]. Welcome to the Wiki! --{{User:BobBoberton/sig}} 21:15, 17 June 2009 (BST) | ||
== Please only edit correct information == | |||
In [http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php?title=Ketchelbank&diff=prev&oldid=1731970 this edit], you changed Ketchelbank's only revive point from [[St. Matthias's Church (Ketchelbank)|St. Matthias's Church]] to [[St. Pius's Church (Brooke Hills)|St. Pius's Church]]. However, St. Pius's Church is in ''Brooke Hills'', not Ketchelbank. Therefore, you gave out a false information which can be confusing to other readers, not to mention that the link became a <font color=#CC0000>red link</font> (i.e. broken), since it link to a non-existent article. I've changed it back to the correct version. Please always check that your information is correct before making your next edit. Thank you. -- [[User:Kittithaj|Kittithaj]] 23:49, 23 July 2010 (BST) | |||
Revision as of 22:49, 23 July 2010
Welcome to the Wiki!
If you have any questions or need any help, feel free to drop by my talk page. Welcome to the Wiki! --Bob Boberton TF / DW 21:15, 17 June 2009 (BST)
Please only edit correct information
In this edit, you changed Ketchelbank's only revive point from St. Matthias's Church to St. Pius's Church. However, St. Pius's Church is in Brooke Hills, not Ketchelbank. Therefore, you gave out a false information which can be confusing to other readers, not to mention that the link became a red link (i.e. broken), since it link to a non-existent article. I've changed it back to the correct version. Please always check that your information is correct before making your next edit. Thank you. -- Kittithaj 23:49, 23 July 2010 (BST)
