UDWiki:Administration/Promotions: Difference between revisions
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
'''Question''' - Can you list your "qualifications" as it were?--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature}} 23:43, 5 January 2011 (UTC) | '''Question''' - Can you list your "qualifications" as it were?--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature}} 23:43, 5 January 2011 (UTC) | ||
'''Q''' - If you do obtain the status of SysOps, what do you see yourself doing that will/will not benefit the community? --{{User:Axe Hack/Sig}} 23:50, 5 January 2011 (UTC) | |||
==Candidates currently under community discussion== | ==Candidates currently under community discussion== | ||
Revision as of 23:50, 5 January 2011
Template:Moderationnav Template:Promotions Intro
Candidates still requiring vouches
Vapor
Proficient, prolific, and probably not secretly a rapist. You knows he knows what he's doing, and I'd like to see him given the keys that he's suited for (acception willing of course). 
23:29, 5 January 2011 (UTC)
Question any previous sop experience? --RosslessnessWant a Location Image? 23:31, 5 January 2011 (UTC)
Question - Can you list your "qualifications" as it were?--Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 23:43, 5 January 2011 (UTC)
Q - If you do obtain the status of SysOps, what do you see yourself doing that will/will not benefit the community? --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ #nerftemplatedsigs 23:50, 5 January 2011 (UTC)
Candidates currently under community discussion
There are currently no candidates under community discussion.
Recently Concluded Bids
UDWiki:Administration/Promotions/Dezonus archived as unsuccessful. -- Spiderzed▋ 12:07, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
For more concluded bids, see Promotion Candidacies.
