UDWiki talk:Administration/Vandal Banning/Archive/2011 03: Difference between revisions
MisterGame (talk | contribs) |
Michaleson (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
::DevilAsh is a liar. He is unable to feel brainwaves, having no receiver for them, nor the vital organ with which to translate them. Similarly, Nickizdaboss could not have sent him any, for the same reasons. Escalation! --{{User:DT/Signature}} 22:19, 20 March 2011 (UTC) | ::DevilAsh is a liar. He is unable to feel brainwaves, having no receiver for them, nor the vital organ with which to translate them. Similarly, Nickizdaboss could not have sent him any, for the same reasons. Escalation! --{{User:DT/Signature}} 22:19, 20 March 2011 (UTC) | ||
:::Just you wait till you go to bed tonight, I'll be sending some mean waves your way. {{User:Ashley Valentine/sig}} 22:21, 20 March 2011 (UTC) | :::Just you wait till you go to bed tonight, I'll be sending some mean waves your way. {{User:Ashley Valentine/sig}} 22:21, 20 March 2011 (UTC) | ||
:::: I plead that this is a viable case for permission--{{User:Michaleson/sig}} 22:33, 20 March 2011 (UTC) | |||
:Well, he ''did'' at least sign his edit. Since when was providing testimonials considered vandalism? I say wait and see how the contribution is appreciated by the user in question before rushing into anything. {{User:Revenant/Sig}} 22:22, 20 March 2011 (UTC) | :Well, he ''did'' at least sign his edit. Since when was providing testimonials considered vandalism? I say wait and see how the contribution is appreciated by the user in question before rushing into anything. {{User:Revenant/Sig}} 22:22, 20 March 2011 (UTC) | ||
::::I'll have a restraining order on your brain, sir! Not within .2 on the gieger counter for 20 ft! That'll do you! --{{User:DT/Signature}} 22:24, 20 March 2011 (UTC) | ::::I'll have a restraining order on your brain, sir! Not within .2 on the gieger counter for 20 ft! That'll do you! --{{User:DT/Signature}} 22:24, 20 March 2011 (UTC) |
Revision as of 22:33, 20 March 2011
March 2011
Ashley Valentine
- Well, he did at least sign his edit. Since when was providing testimonials considered vandalism? I say wait and see how the contribution is appreciated by the user in question before rushing into anything. ᚱᛁᚹᛖᚾᚨᚾᛏ 22:22, 20 March 2011 (UTC)
Rosslessness
You guys are all just ripping me off. And after I stopped using these, even. Tsk. No imagination. ᚱᛁᚹᛖᚾᚨᚾᛏ 22:29, 20 March 2011 (UTC)
Uhhhm
I wasn't aware impersonating no one was a vandal offense. Trying to trick a group on a talk page while probably not the coolest thing to do really doesn't have anything to do with bad faith editing. If anything it's probably more inline with the debate over alt-abuse in-game than anything the wiki administration should care about. --Karekmaps?! 01:35, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
- All that checkuser confirms is that lawliet impersonated a different user with the same IP. I won't name the other user but will say that Lawiet has not claimed they are one in the same so my ruling was based on the fact that they were different users. ~ 01:43, 8 March 2011
- Understandable but all you really have to go on for true identity is the IP in this circumstance. Neither has particularly large edit histories and they obviously wouldn't publicly acknowledge it in light of what they were doing unless they absolutely had to. Not to mention it seems pretty clear cut to me, without checkuser, that they're likely the same people simply from how ridiculous the comments are and the questions they raised. Odds are that the third involved user is also them considering the group page but that's for you guys to know. --Karekmaps?! 01:51, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
What if, though the chance is very slim indeed, the user in question is actually trying to play both sides of the coin, so to speak? I mean, he's pretty new, so he might be trying to get his alts to fight without really understanding the anti-zerg countermeasures... But, if he is trying to one-up the RRF using his new group, he's in for one helluva surprise... -- † talk ? f.u. 12:58, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
- I'm really hoping this is the case because I've been trying to help him for a while now... -- † talk ? f.u. 13:11, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
- Even if this is deemed Vandalism, that doesn't mean that you have to stop to help. A/VB exists to undo damage and prevent future damage, not to pillory users and call in the riffraff to throw rotten tomatoes. Heck, I even helped Cornlolio on wiki matters, and boy did he work on getting escalated...
As for the case, at least to me it seems unlikely that this is a good faith attempt to fight her own alts. But then again, the whole linked discussion is weird. -- Spiderzed▋ 13:24, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
- Even if this is deemed Vandalism, that doesn't mean that you have to stop to help. A/VB exists to undo damage and prevent future damage, not to pillory users and call in the riffraff to throw rotten tomatoes. Heck, I even helped Cornlolio on wiki matters, and boy did he work on getting escalated...
DER FUHRER
Haha, oh boy. This guy is seriously making me laugh now. I mean, yeesh, it's just.. so.. pointless. And obvious. And easily reverted. And stuff. Oidar 20:34, 15 March 2011 (UTC)