User talk:DanceDanceRevolution: Difference between revisions
Line 111: | Line 111: | ||
Thanks, --{{User:Nickizdaboss574/Sig}} 14:28, 2 September 2012 (BST) | Thanks, --{{User:Nickizdaboss574/Sig}} 14:28, 2 September 2012 (BST) | ||
:Firstly, you'll need to make a mock up sig of how you want your status to be displayed. Once you've done that, I can start creating the pages in your userspace and then tell you how to use it. {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig}} 03:29, 3 September 2012 (BST) | :Firstly, you'll need to make a mock up sig of how you want your status to be displayed. Once you've done that, I can start creating the pages in your userspace and then tell you how to use it. {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig}} 03:29, 3 September 2012 (BST) | ||
::Hey I decided I don't want a online status in my sig, its alright you dont have to. Im pretty content with mine now. Sorry if you have started or anything but thanks for saying you would!--{{User:Nickizdaboss574/Sig}} 23:33, 3 September 2012 (BST) | |||
Revision as of 22:33, 3 September 2012
|
Who do you think laughed more?
Me or you? I come back for all of five edits, got under your skin, created a stink your still bitching about a total of 15 or so days later, essientially created a fictious arby, in the hopes that someone would take it more seriously than I ever did, only so I could refuse to take part, and all so that I could piss in your cheerios,... but the joke was on me... I see how that works. -Poodle of DoomT*C 06:10, 16 October 2011 (BST)
- You know we all forgot about you again the second you stopped posting, right? 12:02, 16 October 2011 (BST)
- The true definition of Meh. --Hey Sweden! 12:13, 16 October 2011 (BST)
- Yeah the joke was on me. You flip the fuck out when I say 3 words, make an arbitration case which everyone literally pisses on for 4 days, you delete your newly created "awesome returning!" group and fuck back off. yeah jokes on me annoying 12:27, 16 October 2011 (BST)
- Poodle, if you were just joking around, why did you send me an email begging me to be a fair and unbiased arbitrator while at the same time expressing your fears that the community was plotting against you and planning to set up a biased ruling in the arbies case?--Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 13:07, 16 October 2011 (BST)
- Ahahahahahahahahhahahahahaha
- hahahahahahah
- ahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
- hahahahahah
- Now that we have settled it is, in fact, I who laughed most, I'd like to take the time to point out that "I was a puppetmaster all along, only pretending to be retarded!" is the most laughable excuse. This whingy, whining paragraph you posted here is much funnier than the whole case. Thankyou! --Karloth Vois ¯\(°_o)/¯ 12:56, 17 October 2011 (BST)
Well hello thar
Dun with being annoying, I see? -- Thadeous Oakley Talk 06:57, 10 December 2011 (UTC)
- I hope to dance on the fine line between being helpful and annoying. DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 01:43, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
can't make headers, cant indent
I have explanation in the discussion, and this is fact, not opinion. If you have someone with better than I understand to let someone else do it or I can't say it at least, but if you have the Red Rum statistic there you are showing proof for a guild, I am only showing proof for a player instead. But the proof is still there --Krazyxman 01:50, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
- You're that guy? I don't see any subtantial proof at all. You're willing to tell me that proof of 11 screenshots is worth calling yourself the piñata king? I would highly suggest getting more proof before making this claim because at this stage, like on the talk page, I really think this will end up with your claim being refuted and you being laughed off the case DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 01:58, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
- and btw, I also did not make this change for a long time until I have the proof on my profile to back up the claim. --Krazyxman 01:56, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
- Again, I have done 35 more than that already, but without screenshots, the rest of the new ones I have screenshots for, so if someone else has more, then I will agree with your judgement, but if no one else has more then making the judgement is wrong from you --Krazyxman 02:02, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
- Definitely. I just hope with your 11 proven piñatas you just enjoy that 18.4 seconds of fame. DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 02:08, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
- it is 14 actually and it is increasing the more i play --Krazyxman 02:09, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
- 14! Make that 25 seconds. DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 02:10, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
- again, if others are so mad about it they want to just get 15 in a row in a few min. just to try to prove me wrong, then fine, I'll accept it, but if people want to play the real honest way, i have always been honest, even with all the ones i did before even though i wasn't keeping track of them at the time, but i have no reason to lie and if you saw my game profile at that time you will see I change it by one only every time i do it.....again, the only reason i start doing screenshots is to show i am not lying when i make my claim, otherwise i would say i did 1000 pinatas, but i never did it so why should i say it. --Krazyxman 02:16, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
- even on the discussion page you can see people admitting i did many of the pinatas, so it is not like i am just making it out of thin air, just the exact number is in dispute, but i have always been honest about that--Krazyxman 02:21, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
- 14! Make that 25 seconds. DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 02:10, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
- it is 14 actually and it is increasing the more i play --Krazyxman 02:09, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
- Definitely. I just hope with your 11 proven piñatas you just enjoy that 18.4 seconds of fame. DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 02:08, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
Bodybuilding
Hello, you said to Corn that you would probably be able to beat him up in real life. Can you post a picture of yourself on this wiki? I'm very curious. Generaloberst 11:21, 8 April 2012 (BST)
- i know i could. hows about you post a picture of your self in your dutch marine uniform? oh right you can't.--User:Sexualharrison11:57, 8 April 2012
- Sigh. If what you said about the intifada is true then you're about 50 now Harrison. I'm 20 in a month and yet you are yelling that you could beat me up. Let go off your youth old man. Generaloberst 13:19, 8 April 2012 (BST)
- Lol when did I say that? I wanna read, gimme link bro DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 14:25, 8 April 2012 (BST)
- Right before Corn said that he would ram his finger up your ass. Generaloberst 14:35, 8 April 2012 (BST)
- Haha, ie. when I asked him for pictures? How about the "i asked first" rule before any e-peen contests begin. DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 15:12, 8 April 2012 (BST)
- nah i changed my mind this is me
- I'm gonna fuck you up you little fag DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 15:25, 8 April 2012 (BST)
- Lol very cool. I'm not even here to prove something like "hey im stronger than you" or something. I was just wondering if you bodybuild too, because I do. Generaloberst 17:02, 8 April 2012 (BST)
- Right before Corn said that he would ram his finger up your ass. Generaloberst 14:35, 8 April 2012 (BST)
- i'm 39. now put up or shut up.--User:Sexualharrison17:18, 8 April 2012
- You just heavily dissed yourself. First intifada started 1987. So that would mean you were about 14 when leaving the army. And even if you are 39 then you've still had your best days, so I'm pretty sure that I'm physical stronger than you. Unless you are 6 foot 6 and 200lbs. Not that I care, though. But you're the one that starts yapping about beating other people up. lol. Generaloberst 19:38, 8 April 2012 (BST)
- i said after the first.. god get your facts straight. it lasted till 87' - 92' i'm done. fucking idiot. good luck getting a job with those people skills retard.--User:Sexualharrison22:04, 8 April 2012
- You said, I quote: "and left the army around the first intifada". I knew there was someone going to lose his temper here and I knew it wasn't going to be me haha. Do you have Gilles de la Tourette syndrome or something? Generaloberst 22:37, 8 April 2012 (BST)
Every time this conversation is bumped I think it's about the in-game skill and click on the link expecting to find some game analysis. Every time, I am disappointed. --Shortround }.{ My Contributions 22:54, 8 April 2012 (BST)
Thank you for everything
You've always been a lot of help, whether it be questions about the wiki or about formatting, and I humbly thank you for it. Live long and prosper. --TheBardofOld 01:20, 15 April 2012 (BST)
- Thanks mate, I'm always happy to help anybody out, I was helped by many when I started and I believe in passing that attitude on. Thanks for the kind words. DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 03:17, 15 April 2012 (BST)
combat 18 edits.
just wondering.. do you think we should remove the links to hate stuff also?--User:Sexualharrison13:23, 13 May 2012
Hi DanceDanceRevolution
ᚱᛁᚹᛖᚾᚨᚾᛏ 11:51, 22 May 2012 (BST)
2nd Guy You Eat ?? ""damn You for retiring DDR!"??
Me! --Rosslessness 22:05, 10 July 2012 (BST)
- Best! DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 01:05, 11 July 2012 (BST)
- You know you want to come back. —Aichon— 01:48, 11 July 2012 (BST)
- Ohh noo, my contributions strongly reflect my interest. Who knows, in a year things could change. I'm still playing UD every day so it's still in the back of my mind somewhere. But I only log in, help the kilts and log out, everything RPing that UD and the wiki gave me I am currently getting from delving into Face of Mankind in my spare time, strangely enough. If I get hit on the head and forget that the passion is lost, you might find old DDR contribution rates come back in full force. Otherwise I really can't see it happening in the immediate future. DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 16:23, 11 July 2012 (BST)
- Besides, between Shortround actually doing the jobs on time and Karek fighting everyone I'm not really needed. DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 16:24, 11 July 2012 (BST)
- but how will this place go on without your huge walls of text?--User:Sexualharrison18:13, 11 July 2012
- The lack of text walls on this wiki has troubled me greatly I will admit, but the butthurt surrounding team xstreme on historical groups voting has brought out plenty of golden ones of late DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 14:13, 12 July 2012 (BST)
- AHLG and I are doing our parts on DS to provide text walls for everyone. —Aichon— 15:39, 12 July 2012 (BST)
- but they are not drunken rants.. so they just don't count as much.--User:Sexualharrison16:11, 12 July 2012
- But DDR you don't see that those text walls pale in comparison to the ones that you were once famous for (or so I am told as I was not present to witness them first hand). About that, you are wrong. Allow me to explain. 1. The text walls that we have today are not anywhere near as impressive because they do not have the power and expertise as the ones that you (and all those who came before you that also had a phenomenal penchant for text walls (such as Grim s, Akule) used to express and so they do not carry the same effect. They are just lots and lots of words, they are not a text wall. In effect, they are text bricks, all lying together, but they have not been cemented together by the pure intent of the text-waller and so they do not form a text wall but merely a series of text bricks placed atop one another. Therefore, the current text walls are not even slightly comparable to the text walls of old. I've already explained enough why you are WRONG but I'll continue to do so, because there are plenty more reasons. 2. Text walls are defined on websters' online dictionary as being "large spaces of text masterfully crafted such that they cause confusion and disinterest by putting off any such person as would want to view them". For many reasons, the text walls that have recently graced the wiki do not meet that definition. Firstly, the word "large" does not necessarily apply to the current walls. Websters' online dictionary defines "large" as "big, somewhat large, colossal". None of these words apply to the small and lacking walls that we see nowadays. Frankly, these are just disgraceful and do not fit the definition of "large". Furthermore, there is no mastery to the crafting of these text walls. They are just made calmly and reasonably, completely forsaking the purpose of the text wall. Text walls exist, not to rationally and slowly outline a lot of detailed points, but to push so much "fact" and data at your enemy at once that they cannot respond within a few minutes and so you take your moral pleasure in your "destruction" of them and their points. The modern text walls simply try to make points logically and sensibly. They are not truly text walls for this reason. 3. Are you really reading this? I'd imagine the joke has grown quite stale by this point. Ah well, I'll continue anyway. 4. Text walls on the wiki today are incomplete because there is no true "drama" to fuel them - they are simply angry posts about nothing, and although some of the best text walls are over trivial issues, the waller themselves must be convinced of the importance of what they are text screaming about. On the modern wiki, where there is little drama to be had, can we really call anything a text wall? For all of these reasons I have made a solid and concrete case as to why you are wrong, backed up by screenshots, facts, national statistics from the government and also by the law of Norway and several east Asian states. For this reason I feel comfortable saying that you have no business saying what you are saying. Ha! --Shortround }.{ My Contributions 17:00, 12 July 2012 (BST) 2 people like this comment.
- AHLG and I are doing our parts on DS to provide text walls for everyone. —Aichon— 15:39, 12 July 2012 (BST)
- The lack of text walls on this wiki has troubled me greatly I will admit, but the butthurt surrounding team xstreme on historical groups voting has brought out plenty of golden ones of late DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 14:13, 12 July 2012 (BST)
- but how will this place go on without your huge walls of text?--User:Sexualharrison18:13, 11 July 2012
- Besides, between Shortround actually doing the jobs on time and Karek fighting everyone I'm not really needed. DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 16:24, 11 July 2012 (BST)
- Ohh noo, my contributions strongly reflect my interest. Who knows, in a year things could change. I'm still playing UD every day so it's still in the back of my mind somewhere. But I only log in, help the kilts and log out, everything RPing that UD and the wiki gave me I am currently getting from delving into Face of Mankind in my spare time, strangely enough. If I get hit on the head and forget that the passion is lost, you might find old DDR contribution rates come back in full force. Otherwise I really can't see it happening in the immediate future. DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 16:23, 11 July 2012 (BST)
- You know you want to come back. —Aichon— 01:48, 11 July 2012 (BST)
Checkmate
--Rosslessness 17:08, 12 July 2012 (BST)
Found you!
Also, you might want to move... http://iamscott.net/1342671478544.html --Klexur 06:00, 19 July 2012 (BST)
- Deary me... I stay in one block for two weeks, move one square and I'm getting my balls busted within an hour... I ran like the wind! DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 06:42, 19 July 2012 (BST)
This & this
Careful. Too much fanboying and I may have no choice but to shoehorn you into a sysop position against your will so that you can back me up in anything I say or do. ;)
Also, LOL. Thanks, man. —Aichon— 15:59, 10 August 2012 (BST)
Online status.
I would really like one of those to show of I am online in my siggy. You said contact you If people wanted one and I really want one in my sig! Thanks, -- •הבוס• ♥ CGR 14:28, 2 September 2012 (BST)