User talk:A Helpful Little Gnome

My talk page: When leaving new messages, just hit the "+" symbol for a new header. I may or may not respond here, depending on who you are. Unless you're a mudkip, in that case the response will be a knife to the knee.

Other talk pages: A tip for making a talk page: Keep it simple, don't over organize like this and remember to archive, to prevent duplicate headers and general annoyance.

Not ridiculous

Not at all.... --WanYao 19:50, 8 September 2008 (BST)

I undid your removal of the Talk:Suggestion deletion request. The way I see it, you were dead wrong... There were two choices: either DDC is put up for Vandalism, for shitting up the Admin pages and/or doing something very close to putting deletions up for deletion (although Suggestions is not, as far as I can tell, technically an Admin page)... and if he is warned, his vandal edits are removed. Or, the deletions request is valid and legitimate. The former condition was not met... See the logic? Put DCC up for Vandalism if that request was "ridiculous"... --WanYao 20:50, 8 September 2008 (BST)

Show where the Policy is for Suggestion, please. I can't find any Policy covering that page and its system. I looked... Twice... Maybe I am looking in the wrong place. --WanYao 20:55, 8 September 2008 (BST)

Did you try the suggestions page?

Q. Can I send you some ideas?

A. All players are welcome to suggest alterations and additions that they think would improve the game - we can't guarantee that they'll be implemented, but anything submitted to the Suggestions page of the Urban Dead Wiki will certainly be passed on and read, if it passes peer review. --Kevan

I'm not going to put DCC up for vandalism because I don't see the point. Someone more annoyed than me might, but not me. --  AHLGTG THE END IS NIGH! 21:01, 8 September 2008 (BST)

I'm not annoyed... But I'm not convinced. Your citation of the FAQ imo =/= policy. If it were, then, for example, fixed Revivification Points would be "official" due to this. Or Suburb danger levels are on some level officially sanctioned according to this comment from Kevan. Kevan adds things to the FAQ after it's added to the wiki: I'm not convinced this is any different. The only part of that FAQ that reads to me like a "policy" or "rule" is the infamous "completely seperate existences" thing... Yeah, yeah, I know I'm being pedantic here... >_> --WanYao 21:51, 8 September 2008 (BST)

Ok... If Keven set things up from day one like this... then, okay, yeah... but I haven't been around since 2005... --WanYao 21:54, 8 September 2008 (BST)

It would be rather silly to have something in the official FAQ when the pages mentioned don't exist. It's a part of the game... --  AHLGTG THE END IS NIGH! 00:58, 9 September 2008 (BST)

Wan, where is the "bad faith" in trying to get rid of a page that causes the most flame wars, trolling, and petty arguments? If anything I'm trying to help the community by removing a very hostile page. Maybe people like you, Iscariot, and DCC should not be allowed to be such assholes to other posters. Ever consider that? The suggestions page is clearly not an Admin page (just look at the main page). I seem to recall you doing stunts like that to "prove a point" or generate some debate about whatever injustice you think is going on on the wiki. That has been the case historically. Look at Jorm's stupid policy policy. And AHLG I apologize for my comment about you doing nothing on here. You put up with fuck heads like us and that seems to be more than enough! -- #99 ^DCC 00:12, 9 September 2008 (BST)

Yeah, that was our thinking when We put up the deletions page for deletions. The original poster wasn't warned so I'm not about warn you. Anyways, you have to admit that there are some good ideas and constructive comments on Talk:Suggestions, it's not all bad. --  AHLGTG THE END IS NIGH! 00:58, 9 September 2008 (BST)

You completely missed my point, the WHOLE point, DCC. As well we all the relevant facts. Like, completely. You're so off base, in fact, this isn't even worth replying to... Ciao. --WanYao 12:02, 9 September 2008 (BST)

Except that, Gnome, I was under the impression that whoever it was who put the deletions page up for deletion was given a vandalism warning... If I am mistaken, then... ok. --WanYao 12:04, 9 September 2008 (BST)

Whats grim on about?

So wheres the template? In the sig? I cant see any { or } help! --Rosslessness^{Want a Location Image?} 22:58, 8 September 2008 (BST)

ignore me. --Rosslessness^{Want a Location Image?} 23:02, 8 September 2008 (BST)

Eric bessette

Thank you for your concern, it was made for a friend, and new group member, he has yet to create his own wiki and is to be controlled by him as soon as he does, again, thank you.--Eric bessette 05:10, 9 September 2008 (BST)