User talk:Spiderzed
THIS!
enjoy! -- The preceding signed comment was added by these amazing looking
bitch 18:15 1 April 2011 (UTC)
Template
If I was a template image, how many kb should I be? --Kirsty cotton 17:42, 4 April 2011 (BST)
- There are no real rules on that, and it depends also on the size of the template. However, it should be as little as possible if the template is meant to be used in bulk with others (as with userspace flagboxes). Just upload it, I can always look if I can trim it some more in Gimp for you. -- Spiderzed▋ 17:48, 4 April 2011 (BST)
- Should it go in the main space or my user space? --Kirsty cotton 17:49, 4 April 2011 (BST)
- Just upload it. I'll find a place in my userspace to ark it until you can put it to use. -- Spiderzed▋ 17:52, 4 April 2011 (BST)
- Don't worry about that, it's going to be on your userpage. Once I figure out how to make a template. --Kirsty cotton 17:56, 4 April 2011 (BST)
- Mah userpage? D: 8kb works perfectly fine: If you need help making a template, let me know. Given the wideness of 130px, you are probably best off with either a userbox (250px) or a largebox (350px). -- Spiderzed▋ 18:04, 4 April 2011 (BST)
- I think it is something Salwy needs and some jerk locked her page from editing. I would link you but you'll find it anyways. :P --Kirsty cotton 18:06, 4 April 2011 (BST)
- Someone locked Salwy's page? Poppycocks! If I ever find out who that was... -- Spiderzed▋ 18:18, 4 April 2011 (BST)
- It would be good faith edit to go ahead and add the template to Katie Burns userpage, right? --Kirsty cotton 18:20, 4 April 2011 (BST)
- Better put the template on her talk page and ask her about it. We had recently enough retarded A/VB cases. -- Spiderzed▋ 18:21, 4 April 2011 (BST)
- Something stupid happen on the wiki? NEVAR!!!!! --Kirsty cotton 18:25, 4 April 2011 (BST)
- Better put the template on her talk page and ask her about it. We had recently enough retarded A/VB cases. -- Spiderzed▋ 18:21, 4 April 2011 (BST)
- It would be good faith edit to go ahead and add the template to Katie Burns userpage, right? --Kirsty cotton 18:20, 4 April 2011 (BST)
- Someone locked Salwy's page? Poppycocks! If I ever find out who that was... -- Spiderzed▋ 18:18, 4 April 2011 (BST)
- I think it is something Salwy needs and some jerk locked her page from editing. I would link you but you'll find it anyways. :P --Kirsty cotton 18:06, 4 April 2011 (BST)
- Mah userpage? D: 8kb works perfectly fine:
- Don't worry about that, it's going to be on your userpage. Once I figure out how to make a template. --Kirsty cotton 17:56, 4 April 2011 (BST)
- Just upload it. I'll find a place in my userspace to ark it until you can put it to use. -- Spiderzed▋ 17:52, 4 April 2011 (BST)
- Should it go in the main space or my user space? --Kirsty cotton 17:49, 4 April 2011 (BST)
Pwnies in IRC
They are there wondering about Salwy. --Kirsty cotton 00:31, 7 April 2011 (BST)
- They are very keen that Salwy brings a saddle if she's coming out to play. Because, you know, eww. User:Domino Harvey 00:32, 7 April 2011 (BST)
- Does this relate to Salwy's lack of panties? --Kirsty cotton 00:44, 7 April 2011 (BST)
WTF?
who are these people?.. there needs to be a rule in historical voting. that if you started playing during the three or four mouths of inactively you should not vote on a historical vote if you had nothing to do with it. i mean had these players been around when CK was active it would be a different story.. a few of these votes seem like "hey i don't like this group sign up for the wiki and meatpuppet it with me votes" TBH.
we waz robbed!-- The preceding signed comment was added by these amazing looking
bitch 19:50 10 April 2011 (UTC)
- Happened with both sides and there were experienced active users during CK's time that said they weren't historical too. --Karekmaps?! 23:11, 10 April 2011 (BST)
- for the most part i don't mind that. they are entitled to their opinion. at least they were around and listed reasons why we shouldn't be historical. shadey shit and the policy should be changed.-- The preceding signed comment was added by these amazing looking bitch 00:48 12 April 2011 (UTC)
DHPD Officer 666 and Officer Alcoholic
If I start removing any allegedly NPOV postings by these jokers am I going to cause a big fuss or will people just be glad to see them gone? We don't like having them up there, it gives too much jam to the goons but were being cautious about messing with them too much for fear of causing some big flame war. However, it looks like the goons are going to take issue anyway, in which case we might as well remove them. Sorry to trouble you, I wasn't sure where the correct place to ask would be. Purple Cat ~ DHPD 09:35, 15 April 2011 (BST)
- Realised I'd forgotten to drop by and say thanks for your advice on this. I gather DHPD Officer 666-alikes are still playing games with suburb pages, just not any of the one's I've been watching as relevant to the DHPD. If (s)he does return I'll settle for posting some kind of DHPD disclaimer under his/her entry. Purple Cat ~ DHPD 13:37, 26 April 2011 (BST)
Thank you
Thanks for telling me some tips on creating User Boxes! --Suburb 22 Zombies 17:27, 17 April 2011 (BST)
HI!
Stop posting tia.--
►アー・ヒュージ・ゲイピング・バジャイナ◄ スナック ストロング 11:22, 18 April 2011 (BST)
A question
Given that survivors -once- controlled the a supermajority of malton not two weeks ago, how has it changed so rapidly to the present more zed friendly conditions? Corpulent Meatsack 03:49, 19 April 2011 (BST)
- the dead have returned.-- bitch03:51 19 April 2011 (UTC)
- ^This. A zombie group of ~1.500 members can swing around a lot by sheer brute force. -- Spiderzed█ 04:11, 19 April 2011 (BST)
- Wait, how can someone build such an absolute megahorde?! That's like.....wow.....massive. Corpulent Meatsack 02:01, 20 April 2011 (BST)
- it's happened a few times already. usually how it works is some large gaming forum or something similar stumbles across UD. tries the game. than convinces his forum friends to join en mass. and wham-o! you have a mega horde. shacknews, Lue, something awful (the dead). etc, etc. they get the numbers because they already have them to begin with unlike naturally occurring hordes such as the RFF, FU, MOB, etc etc. hope that helps.-- bitch 03:34 20 April 2011 (UTC)
- lue were the secks -- ϑanceϑanceℜevolution 03:59, 20 April 2011 (BST)
- it's happened a few times already. usually how it works is some large gaming forum or something similar stumbles across UD. tries the game. than convinces his forum friends to join en mass. and wham-o! you have a mega horde. shacknews, Lue, something awful (the dead). etc, etc. they get the numbers because they already have them to begin with unlike naturally occurring hordes such as the RFF, FU, MOB, etc etc. hope that helps.-- bitch 03:34 20 April 2011 (UTC)
- Wait, how can someone build such an absolute megahorde?! That's like.....wow.....massive. Corpulent Meatsack 02:01, 20 April 2011 (BST)
- ^This. A zombie group of ~1.500 members can swing around a lot by sheer brute force. -- Spiderzed█ 04:11, 19 April 2011 (BST)
Hey Bro
Fix your signature, it's too tall. The limit is 14px, you should know this already, c'mon son. Honestly, some people... --モッズはホモです 
04:09, 19 April 2011 (BST)
noprotect
Hey. The suggestion was bombarded with crap from a random user, not edited after suggestion (if you know what I mean). I'm probably missing something but I've reverted it all back to its original setting and continued the vote. -- ϑanceϑanceℜevolution 02:47, 1 May 2011 (BST)
for you!
|
A FREE KNISH |
| Sexualharrison has given Spiderzed a Knish for killing lots of Nazi's |
User:MeatPuppet
Could I get a checkuser on this user in relation to this policy vote?--The General T Sys U! P! F! 17:24, 5 May 2011 (BST)
- No. --カシュー, ザ ゾンビ クィーン (ビープ ビープ)
@ 17:31, 5 May 2011 (BST)
