Talk:Peer Rejected Suggestions

From The Urban Dead Wiki
Revision as of 23:51, 23 June 2007 by Armareum (talk | contribs) (→‎NEW Peer Rejected Page: changed comment to read better)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigationJump to search

How about leaving the votes on, or at least one vote, to make it clear why the suggestion was rejected? Burning Flesh is obvious, but Separate Speaking AP isn't. --Spiro 19:18, 7 Nov 2005 (GMT)

Seconded. It's best to know why these ideas were rejected, so they don't come up again. --LouisB3 02:06, 9 Nov 2005 (GMT)
well i dunno about that, but i'm thinking about moving some of the discusions to follow the same way that the idea went after it was voted on--Spellbinder 01:59, 9 Nov 2005 (GMT)

Some of this stuff is clearly a joke. My favorite is "Sensu beans." Isn't there a page for "dumb suggestions?" X1M43 06:53, 17 Nov 2005 (GMT)

I was considering replacing the red text and everything after it with "If you're dumb enough to post your brand new suggestion on a page clearly labeled for rejects, it'll probably end up here anyway, so go right ahead and save us all the trouble." I wanted to run this by everyone first. Slicer 13:32, 31 Dec 2005 (GMT)

Organizing this page when it starts flooding

Just wondering. How we are going to organize this page when the two-week period starts to end? There are going to be a lot of stuff here, and we want people to be able to check if their idea is already here, and thus a duplicate idea. Could we put this in categories? And what kinds of categories?--McArrowni 02:00, 14 Nov 2005 (GMT)

I'm thinking we could make seperate pages for each suggestion "Type". That should keep things organized for a while. --Raelin 00:48, 22 Nov 2005 (GMT)

Crumbling Flesh

Eh, the point was that it'd be harder to pick up a zombie after it dried out. In retrospect, that's dumb though.--Milo 17:59, 6 Nov 2005 (GMT)

Heh, yea, it was a failed idea, but at least it was a geniune attempt in a new direction. --Spellbinder 01:40, 7 Nov 2005 (GMT)

This idea was utter crap. If this was a skill then they would fall apart just wandering around the streets or attacking barricades.--THOR 01:40, 7 Nov 2005 (GMT)

Layeth the smack on thee

I knew it was going to hurt the moment i read the title, but DAMN. i meen, if you want to "HOO HA" after each kill, by god HOO HA! but to think that you deserve a skill that lets you do it for free? Take that idea and stick it up your hooha.--Spellbinder 18:21, 6 Nov 2005 (GMT)

Healing Zombies is Stupid

I'd like someone to note that this idea was rejected because it is a repeated suggestion, not because the idea didn't have merit. Unfortunately, I can't figure my way around the template... X1M43 04:29, 23 Nov 2005 (GMT)

Already 31kb

Mheheeheheh. So many bad suggestions... - KingRaptor 06:30, 22 Nov 2005 (GMT) Hehehe....funny --Carfan7 04:59, 23 Nov 2005 (GMT)

People not updating suggestions

I've just been updating peer rejected suggestions ect... and I've noticed that there is a massive hole in the updating between the 13th of Nov to 21st of Nov, and the items after are also not being updated. So I was wondering if it's because of the time of year, or is it that people are just being lazy because if we don't keep updating this page then we are going to see the same load of bad suggestions over and over again. - Jedaz 09:51, 19 Dec 2005 (GMT)

Overload!

I can't read the peer rejected page anymore. It's been awhile now. It's just too big or something, I can't see past the table of contents (and I'm not even sure I can see all of that...) --McArrowni 02:31, 25 April 2006 (BST)

People are being lazy --McArrowni W! 21:10, 28 February 2006 (GMT)
OK, I've got a plan! I'm going to split this page up into the months at the very least, that'll cut down on the load time of this page... - Jedaz 12:44, 26 April 2006 (BST)

Page remodeling

I kinda changed this page. I archived suggestions to previous months and added a few peer rejected suggestions to the lists (thank god I know how to program). Once I'm done with the peer rejected I'll get onto the undecided page. But let me know what you all think about the new setup and what not... revert if you truly feal that it is worse now but I reckon it'll save on users loading a massive page which they'll skim over any way. - Jedaz 14:33, 26 April 2006 (BST)

  • A complete TOC would be usefull as atm you cant search all the suggestions at once. A page that only contained a list of names each with an apropraite link would be v.usefull for searches to avoid dupes--xbehave 00:40, 20 May 2006 (BST)
  • Ha, go right ahead. I'm not going to do it because it is too much work, and I'm deadly serious about it being too much work. If you go and do it all, even for one whole months worth on your own I will make a template to celebrate how great you are and post it everywhere. - Jedaz 08:38, 26 May 2006 (BST)

Body Carrying

So I made my suggestion, but the comments have all been deleted. Why have you decided this is a bad idea? ( I'm actually asking, not just trying to be whiney) —The preceding unsigned comment was added by SirBlastalot (talkcontribs) at an unknown time.

People hate pied piper skills, for the most part. Too much potential for griefing. –Xoid MTFU! 06:18, 16 December 2006 (UTC)

Pistol Whip

I've not trying to complain or anything but why did the pistol whip get taken off? One more thing when people spam this kind of stuff or kill I would like to see what they said to change this and fit it to evreyone's liking... Thanks in advance--Lonewolf17a 20:36, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

The responses were in the vein of "Fuck no!", "UNBALANCED", "WTFCENTAURS?", etc. People hated your suggestion because it was incredibly unbalanced. –Xoid MTFU! 06:18, 16 December 2006 (UTC)

NEW Peer Rejected Page

Shouldn't the Suggestions Navigation that is used point towards the Category:Peer_Rejected_Suggestions page, not this one? The Category page links to all the Rejected suggestions, whereas this page is now obsolete. armareum 00:41, 24 June 2007 (BST)