Suggestion:20071008 Talking AP Change

From The Urban Dead Wiki
Revision as of 08:56, 8 October 2007 by Boxy (talk | contribs) ({{spam}} + reply to re:)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigationJump to search
Nospam.gif Spam!
This suggestion was voted as spam and closed for voting, with 1 keep, 2 kill, and 11 spam votes.


Suggestion Navigation
Suggestion Portal
Current SuggestionsSuggestions up for VotingClothes Suggestions
Cycling SuggestionsPeer ReviewedUndecidedPeer RejectedHumorous
Suggestion AdviceTopics to Avoid and WhyHelp, Developing and Editing


20071008 Talking AP Change

Death7 03:09, 8 October 2007 (BST)

Suggestion type
Role Playing Improvement

Suggestion scope
Talking

Suggestion description
Talking cost to much AP and is only really useful for Role Playing. any tactical things can easily be done using Instant Messangers,email or forums.

Talking should cost 1 AP per use but you can say as many things as you want until you do some thing else that uses an 1 or more AP. possible limit this to a certain number of times like 5 or 10 to prevent people from filling the screen with random text just to be annoying.

Voting Section

Voting Rules
Votes must be numbered, justified, signed, and timestamped.
# justification ~~~~

Votes that do not conform to the above may be struck by any user.

The only valid votes are Keep, Kill, Spam or Dupe. If you wish to abstain from voting, do not vote.


Keep votes

  1. Keep-author Death7 03:23, 8 October 2007 (BST)

Kill votes

  1. Kill I've seen a lot of speech/AP suggestions, but this is the most retarded by far. --Slicer 03:36, 8 October 2007 (BST)
  2. Kill I'm sorry, but this is going to create an awfull lot of spam.--SeventythreeTalk 07:49, 8 October 2007 (BST)

Spam votes

  1. Spam- No. More talk = more spam. Don't argue with me, it ALWAYS happens. --Vkkhamul 03:28, 8 October 2007 (BST)
  2. SPAM - I refer to the suggestions does and don'ts. Don't give it away. Every action has a cost (Dropping items costs the item).Antitribu 03:50, 8 October 2007 (BST)
  3. Spam 5 to 10 times the spam, huh? Talking is partially because NOT EVERYBODY METAGAMES. Those who do don't ALL USE THE SAME DAMN METAGAMING CHANNEL! What the hell! Burn the witch! From your reasoning, the only reason to talk is to spam, and this just makes it 5 times easier! GAH!--Wooty 04:10, 8 October 2007 (BST)
  4. Spam - Jesus wept. --Steakfish 04:35, 8 October 2007 (BST)
  5. Spam - I try to follow the "don't vote spam" ideal lately... but today is rife with suggestions that genuinely go against the spirit and balance of the game. This is one of those... Talking is a useful in-activity and therefore can't be free. Period. --WanYao 04:57, 8 October 2007 (BST)
  6. Spam - Talking is limited for numerous reasons, some of which this suggestion conflicts with.--Karekmaps?! 05:48, 8 October 2007 (BST)
  7. Spam - 5 or 10 times 50 AP adds up to a shitload of spam... and there's already enough of that -- boxytalk • 06:46 8 October 2007 (BST)
    ok this wasn't very well thought out i would just like to see people talk more often in the game because it is rare at times and i figured i would just post something to see if it would help. i probably should have looked for other similar suggestion before posting this Death7 07:40, 8 October 2007 (BST)
    If you want to check the reaction that your suggestions may have before putting them up for voting, post them on the suggestions talk page first (it's recommended practice). If you want to hear talking, head for a mall or fort... they never shut up in there ;) -- boxytalk • 09:56 8 October 2007 (BST)
  8. Spam - I usually dont vote spam, but... Spam.--  Savant  Chit-Chat  08:36, 8 October 2007 (BST)
  9. Spam Extra talking is extra spam. Also, format your replies. --Karlsbad 08:48, 8 October 2007 (BST)
  10. Spam - pure spam --~~~~ [talk] 08:59, 8 October 2007 (BST)
  11. Egg, bacon, spam, and sausage – Vary your diet a little. ᚱᛁᚹᛖᚾ 09:50, 8 October 2007 (BST)