UDWiki:Administration/Sysop Archives/Boxy/2012-10-27 Re-Evaluation

Administration » Sysop Archives » Boxy » 2012-10-27 Re-Evaluation

User:Boxy

• Boxy (talk | contribs | UDWiki contribs | vndl data)

Been a long time (April fools last year) since I've needed one of these, so yeah, have at it -- boxy 10:22, 27 October 2012 (BST)

• vouch box is sysop for life.--User:Sexualharrison12:06, 27 October 2012
• Question What sustains your continued interest in UDwiki? --Ross Less Ness ^{Enter Stranger...} 12:34, 27 October 2012 (BST)

  Interesting question. I'm pretty sure it's something to do with having absolutely no life -- boxy 08:39, 28 October 2012 (BST)

• Vouch - Obviously, activity could use a bit of a poke sometimes. However, for one con, Boxy's stability and usefulness, as always, outweigh any issues, and his continues ultra-long-term activity is a great offset for any short-term droughts he may have. A ZOMBIE ANT 15:01, 27 October 2012 (BST)
• Vouchin it up Bob Moncrief ^EBD•W! 15:27, 27 October 2012 (BST)
• Vouch --Papa Moloch 15:30, 27 October 2012 (BST)
• Vouch - I'd like to draw a distinction between inactivity (not contributing) and absence (not being here to edit). You're frequently inactive, but you generally are good about being here when the wiki needs you. More than that, you are one of only a handful of sysops I've seen who can walk into a seemingly-complex situation and just hand down a simple resolution that makes sense and cuts through all the BS. As a 'crat, your infrequent absences got in the way a few times, but as a sysop, you've been a huge help in dealing with bots these last few months, and your opinions are very, very welcome whenever drama does arise. That said, I'm curious about your response to Ross' question as well. —Aichon— 17:09, 27 October 2012 (BST)
• Vouch ~ _{17:24, 27 October 2012 (UTC)}
• Vouch -Could be around a bit more but is always solid when he is around.MHSstaff 18:12, 27 October 2012 (BST)
• Vouch - I'd like to see him being more active, but when he is around, he does good work. -- Spiderzed█ 18:23, 27 October 2012 (BST)
• Vouch --^A_O^R_D^M_O^P_R^I _! ^T 19:59, 27 October 2012 (BST)
• Auto-Vouch - I tried to vote against, but my keyboard slapped me with the mouse. --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ ^{#nerftemplatedsigs} 23:25, 27 October 2012 (BST)
• Who? --THE Godfather of Яesensitized, Anime Sucks ^{Yalk | W! U! WMM| CC CPFOAS LOE ZHU | Яezzens} 03:49, 2 November 2012 (UTC)

  Wow, what a friggin noob? A ZOMBIE ANT 13:54, 2 November 2012 (UTC)

Ross and I agree with the consensus here. As such, we will not be removing boxy's shackles yet, thus keeping him tied to the sysop position. Of course, I'd be negligent in my duties if I didn't point out that "could use more activity" is a bit of a recurring theme when it comes to describing boxy's handling of sysop stuff. Even so, his re-evaluation is a resounding success. —Aichon— 14:51, 4 November 2012 (UTC)