|
|
| (24 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| == Undeadites Attack ==
| | {{BurbTalkArchive}} |
|
| |
|
| I'm getting really annoyed with the [[Undeadites]] attack. Attacking with infiltrators, PKers and infecters are already annoying enough, but they don't have the good graces of the [[Ridleybank Resistance Front]] to just move on -- they're staying put, taunting us with repeated attacks. Can the survivors reach a common agreement to deny them sanctuary? Non-revival, common sharing of intelligence on known gathering spots, overlapping support for Genny/ Tranny replacement. -- [[User:Lynx7725|Lynx7725]] 04:12, 21 August 2009 (BST)
| | ==Great Suburb Group Massacre 2011== |
| | {{GSM2011suburb |
| | |suburb=Lockettside |
| | |sigposter={{User:Spiderzed/Sandbox/Sig}} 22:39, 22 January 2011 (UTC) |
| | |sigcontact={{User:Spiderzed/Sandbox/Sig}} |
| | |sigcleared=--{{User:Spiderzed/Sandbox/Sig}} 13:34, 6 February 2011 (UTC) |
|
| |
|
| :'''All your bra!nz are belong to us......''' [[User:Creeping Crud|Creeping Crud]] <sup>[[Undeadites|<span style="color: Green; background-color:{{{3|transparent}}}">U</span>]]</sup> 16:04, 24 August 2009 (BST)
| | |g1=Lockettside Boys |
| | |c1=22 January 2011 (UTC) |
| | |d1=Removed |
|
| |
|
| :: ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ -- [[User:Lynx7725|Lynx7725]] 19:24, 24 August 2009 (BST)
| | |g2=Team Zombie Hardcore |
| | |c2=22 January 2011 (UTC) |
| | |d2=Confirmed |
| | }} |
|
| |
|
| :::'''Letting bra!nz age for a month or so tenderizes them, making them more flavorful. See you in the food court!''' [[User:Creeping Crud|Creeping Crud]] <sup>[[Undeadites|<span style="color: Green; background-color:{{{3|transparent}}}">U</span>]]</sup> 18:09, 23 September 2009 (BST)
| |
|
| |
| == Second Big Bash ==
| |
|
| |
| In order to help future attempts to coordinate a response to the [[The Second Big Bash|2nd Big Bash]], I have set up a page specifically for this purpose called "[[Survivors vs The Second Big Bash]]". Please add any news on this page, and any ideas for strategy on the [[Talk:Survivors vs The Second Big Bash|discussion page]]. Good luck! --[[User:Richardhg|Richardhg]] 03:53, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| ==News, etc.==
| |
|
| |
| Until this page is unprotected, I suggest posting NPOV status updates, news, etc. here. It's pretty annoying that ONE USER is causing so many problems that the entire suburb page has to be locked -- locked to the many, many normal and non-vandalistic people who use this page... But what can you do? Hopefully the situation will be resolved soon. --[[User:WanYao|WanYao]] 04:47, 23 October 2007 (BST)
| |
| :How poetic: Lockettside is locked. Anyway, there's not a whole lot of news. People in the suburb know where the zombies are.--[[User:Insomniac By Choice|Insomniac By Choice]] 04:59, 24 October 2007 (BST)
| |
| ::HAHAHAHAHA.--{{User:Thari/sig}} 05:18, 24 October 2007 (BST)
| |
| :::I see that the "unprotection" has finally taken place, albeit too late to help coordinate our attempts to attck or flee! --[[User:Richardhg|Richardhg]] 03:53, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
| |
|
| |
| ==Flee!==
| |
| Second Big Bash is in South Blyville. This is the most likely next target, as this has a mall. I advise any and all survivors; Flee! Flee to the Northeast, away from malls, and red zones. {{User:Nalikill/Sig}} 03:08, 22 October 2007 (BST)
| |
| == RESCUE Policy ==
| |
|
| |
| The DEM has a new revive policy under consideration that would reduce the risks to revivers and generally make life easier all round. Put simply, all churches should become indoor revive points with no cades. This svaes AP as you don't have to go outside and can just free run in and out and also provides a guarenteed entry point for the newly revived, as well as anyone else caught out by people ignoring local barricading policy. For the full details please see http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php/RESCUE%21
| |
|
| |
| Currently The Legions of Lockettside support the adoption of this policy in Lockettside and have started spreading the word with radio broadcasts and tags. The main wiki page was changed to include a link to the policy on the 6th of July. Over a month later and there have been no objections so can we now make the permanent changes needed to the revive points?
| |
| --[[User:Fausta Gummings|Fausta Gummings]] 13:01, 19th August 2007 (BST)
| |
|
| |
| == Wiki Vandalism? ==
| |
|
| |
| Anybody have any plans to do something about Chill's posts to News section? This person, who obviously thinks they're a lot funnier than they really are, spams the suggestion pages, and is now vandalising the News section.
| |
|
| |
| I don't usually play in this 'burb, I was just doing some "research"... when I cam across Chill's news posting from 30 July... Not only is it blatantly flaunting any attempt at NPOV, it's generally just plain abusive, and actually quite sexist and demeaning, overall - certainly not appropriate in ANY context for this wiki, even as "humour".
| |
|
| |
| I hope the residents of this fine 'burb won't stand for this and do something to reign in this vandal. --[[User:WanYao|WanYao]] 19:27, 31 July 2007 (BST)
| |
|
| |
| : and though IMO Chill is the worst offender, they don't seem to be the only abusing the wiki.......
| |
| --[[User:WanYao|WanYao]] 19:30, 31 July 2007 (BST)
| |
|
| |
| :: Good point. All main page contributions should be neutral, unfortunately it's often easier for people to just add to the news section as fewer people bother with the discussion page (IMO) It will all be gone after the next news archiving anyway.
| |
|
| |
| :Was it anti-PKer of some sort? --[[User:Secruss|Secruss]] 23:48, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
| |
|
| |
| == Revive Point Violator/Griefer ==
| |
|
| |
| A user by the name of Officer Dill attacked my character while waiting in a posted RP.
| |
|
| |
| here are the iWitness links...
| |
|
| |
| http://iwrecords.urbandead.info/07-26-07_1900hrs_PUBLIC/OUT_28-82_RP_Violation_7fc-475-3fa.html
| |
|
| |
| and then after I said "Mrh?" ...
| |
|
| |
| http://iwrecords.urbandead.info/07-26-07_1900hrs_PUBLIC/OUT_28-82_RP_Violation_-__018-d48-230.html
| |
|
| |
| I then said "Graaagh!" and was hoping to attack him with help the other zambah at the RP ... but the coward fled the scene...
| |
|
| |
| Don't heal or revive this n00b if you see him.
| |
|
| |
| --[[User:WanYao|WanYao]] 19:38, 26 July 2007 (BST)
| |
|
| |
| I accidently killed a zombie waiting for revive. I just got to Lockettside for the first time and was in an unusually noisy room playing UD so I didn't notice the graffiti. If I get added to a no-revive list, then so be it, but I would love to not have to leave the suburb.
| |
| http://www.urbandead.com/profile.cgi?id=970391
| |
| Sorry about that. [[User:Ubermexico|Ubermexico]] 16:28, 24 August 2007 (BST)
| |
|
| |
| == Barricading Policy ==
| |
| Discussion moved to '''[[Talk:Lockettside Barricade Plan|barricade plan talk page]]''' -- [[User:Boxy|boxy]] <sup>[[User_talk:boxy|T]] [[User:Boxy/Locations|L]] [[Zombie Squad|ZS]] [[PA Posse|PA]] [[Dead Animals|DA]]</sup> 06:15, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
| |
|
| |
| == Lockettside danger level ==
| |
|
| |
| Here one can discuss which danger level should be assigned to Lockettside.
| |
| ---- | | ---- |
| 04 April 2007: Tried to change the level to dangerous, screwed up, someone fixed it for me super fast. We might even want to consider very dangerous status, Mall Tour is really messing stuff up. --[[User:Adancingfool|Adancingfool]]
| |
|
| |
| 30 March 2007: I put danger level to Moderate. Only important zombie presence at SE Mall & Bridgewater. Many buildings included Mall in survivors hands with lights on. --[[User:Tarraco|Tarraco]]
| |
|
| |
| 17th March 2007: Legions of Lockettside seem to be holding some resource buildings now and the zombie groups around the eastern side of the suburb aren't massive in size, anyone else feel we should downgrade to Dangerous (orange)? --[[Fausta Gummings]]
| |
|
| |
| 2 november 2006: The break-ins are occuring at a more alarming rate. buildings are coming under attack frequently and YELLOW status might be something to consider ~DiSpUtEd1
| |
|
| |
| : I think that the danger level should be moved to yellow. Constant breakins at Beddington and Josphat are occuring. At the moment, Beddington is under full zed control. --[[User:Azn4life|Azn4life]] 21:17, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
| |
|
| |
| :: I'm not sure. I've been peeking at the neighbourhood for the last few days, and the Zed activities that I can see (about up to Beddington FD) isn't very heavy; Kendall Row might be hiding a few Zeds but there's really only small scattered groups of less than 10 Zeds. It's not at very dangerous levels, especially if the residents are awake -- this coming from someone who lived through the Tompson Mall seige earlier this year, so might be a bit blased. :D
| |
|
| |
| :: It ''is'' dangerous around Beddington, but very light on Western Lockettside. It was a bit heavier a few days ago; a substantial migration through southern and central Lockettside, but the Halloween Fog broke the observation stream, so can't tell for sure where the heck they all disappeared to. -- [[User:Lynx7725|Lynx7725]] 16:42, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
| |
|
| |
| ----
| |
|
| |
| * 13 september 2006: aside from the occasional break-in there has been quite little zed activity... After a few confirmations of this in-game from the other local groups, it seems okay to shift our suburb to status green. --[[User:John Cannonfodder|John Cannonfodder]] 22:31, 13 September 2006 (BST)
| |
|
| |
| I agree. Things have been quite calm around here besides the few attacks, but small zed groups are always a common thing, nothing to fear. Green would be fitting for the time, though hopefully things don't remain to peaceful, a little action is always welcome. -- [[User:Joe Riggs|Joe Riggs]] 23:32, 13 September 2006 (BST)
| |
|
| |
| == Radio Policy ==
| |
|
| |
| Hmm, 26.11 is the official Lockettside freq (sharing with a number of 'Burbs though..). I'm watching Zed activity and broadcasting as and when I can on 26.11, but Tompson Mall's official freq is 27.20. Not too sure why they warrant a separate freq, perhaps it's to allow pple to call up for supplies. But that does mean those 4 blocks aren't recieving 26.11 broadcasts.
| |
|
| |
| Any stand on this? Not to mention, not much enforcement on the Mall Freq. I noticed the last time I went to the mall it was on 28.something.
| |
|
| |
| Frankly speaking, I don't really care what freq personal radios are on, but the transmitters has ''got'' to stay on 26.11 to be useful. -- [[User:Lynx7725|Lynx7725]] 16:50, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
| |
|
| |
| Here's an update: St.Alexander Hospital and St.Ireanaus church radios are now tuned to 28.02 frequency.These two buildings are to be in constant contact.The hospital is a huge assest so close to the mall.
| |
|
| |
| '''This is the Lockettside OFCOM station to St. Alexander Hospital and St. Ireanaus Church in Lockettside. You are in violation of your radio frequency transmission license. Lockettside radio transmitters are to be kept on 26.11 at all times. The only exception to this rule is the Tompson Mall, which has the frequency 27.20 reserved. Do not, I repeat, DO NOT use others reserved frequencies! Continued violation of this policy will lead to revocation of your radio license, as well as possible litigation by the owners of the reserved frequency. You have been warned.'''
| |
| '''OFCOM, over and out.'''
| |
|
| |
| ''If you have any questions about the radio policy, please refer to the radio page, found [[radio|here]].''
| |
|
| |
| ...So much for trying to RP something decent for a change.
| |
| Look, just stick to the damn frequencies. They are assigned for a reason, namely, coordination, and the fact that anyone walking through the neighborhood can come to wiki page and set their radios for a ''single'' channel and get all relevant news for that area. If you go off and do your own thing, don't blame us if nobody in this area responds to your transmissions. Also, company changed in last post to reflect the UK.
| |
|
| |
| == Following the Cade Policy ==
| |
|
| |
| I woke up today and noticed that [[Bridgewater Crescent Police Department]] was not barricaded according to the neighborhood BP (It's currently at heavy), so greenies w/o free walk can't get in. This should be fixed. I would do it myself, but no axe. Perhaps I'm just a whiner... but if there's policies, it will help to follow them. {{User:Yomiku/yomiSig}}
| |
|
| |
| :It's now fixed, not sure who by. It wasn't wrong for very long. [[User:ExplodingFerret|ExplodingFerret]] 00:06, 25 September 2006 (BST)
| |
|
| |
| ::Sometimes people overcade: whether this is some diabolical plan or just simple cluelessness, I don't know. I used to keep cade levels and warning tags up-to-date when I was still stationed in Lockettside... But if you want your cades right, I'm afraid your going to have to pull your weight and help to achieve that. --[[User:John Cannonfodder|John Cannonfodder]] 10:00, 26 September 2006 (BST)
| |
|
| |
| Back when I used to sleep at Grandon and use BCPD as an entry point, the barracades were sometimes overdone. Recently, the important grafitti to survivors about barracading has been coverded up by annoying "KLEPTOCRACY" tags that have no meaning. This has really been a problem, so LDS and LoBo have tryed to fix it. The next day, however, another annoying Klepto tag is put there. Is tagging all they have time for? -[[User:azn4life|azn4life]] 22:23, October 2006 (BST)
| |
|
| |
| == War? ==
| |
|
| |
| To all Lockettside residents.
| |
| Please note that [[Kleptocracy]] has returned to Lockettside with [[Bangadesh]] still as its leader, as you will see from the 'News and Recent Actions' section of the wiki page they are now fully admitting to being PK'ers.
| |
| Do we need to say more?
| |
|
| |
| _____________________________________________________
| |
|
| |
| (Copied from my user page): I have noticed the discussions with growing concern, and was planning to attempt to help you guys out as the 'neutral Switserland guy', but Real Life and my new post covering [[Grigg Heights]] and [[Reganbank]] left me with not much time...
| |
|
| |
| A PK is only a [[PK]] when it can be proven with a screenshot + the URL of the killer, when it comes to listing a person as a [[PKer]]. I'm sorry, but there's no proof it's "innocent until proven guilty". Please read the [[PK Reporting]] page for the steps to take if you are PKed or witness a Pking incident. The [http://z14.invisionfree.com/Brainstock/index.php?showtopic=2509 DEM PK reporting thread]has plenty of examples of how to report a PKing, and many people use [http://www.imageshack.us/ Image Shack] to upload the screenshot for free. More info on how to report a PK can be found [http://z14.invisionfree.com/Brainstock/index.php?showtopic=2460&st=0&#entry6819618 HERE].
| |
|
| |
| As much as I would like to return to Lockettside, I have other obligations. The mentioning of a "war" in the [[Talk:Lockettside#War|Lockettside discussion page]] doesn't bode well and I must side with Bangadesh in my concerns of survivor on survivor violence. Pking, for any reason whatsoever, will be condemned in the eyes of the [[DEM]]. Period. That having said, if groups like [[Kleptocracy!]] conduct themselves in a manner that other groups find offensive, they can expect hostility. If you continue to let your members tag over important notices concerning revive points or cade levels, Bangadesh, then you should expect to pay the piper. I can warn others on the consequences of taking matters into their own hands, there is only so much I can do as a third party to prevent people from resorting to PK wars. It doesn't matter if "people take the game too seriously", this is an online community and it's always wise to respect eachother's wishes -unless you actually WANT trouble.
| |
|
| |
| Okay, so much for my two cents. The [[Lockettside Boys]] and the [[LDS]] are doing their best to keep a suburb safe. This is something that deserves respect. The flip side is that if any group, no matter how much they contribute to the community, resorts to PKing as a form of passing judgement or as a form of vengeance, the DEM will no longer wish to be affiliated with them. In addition, any '''reported''' Pkers will have a bounty on their head. This doesn't mean that an isolated PK incident conducted by a single member automatically results in the group being marked as a PKer group: trust me, we're not that dramatic... *grin* I do hope that we can resolve this problem by respecting eachother's gameplay... Respecting the hard work of one group on one hand, respecting the other group's wish to be rebels (without a cause?) on the other hand.
| |
|
| |
| Please bear with me here: I don't want to act condescending or judgemental, I just want to help you guys out and resolve this matter... Regards, --[[User:John Cannonfodder|John Cannonfodder]] 10:29, 6 October 2006 (BST)
| |
|
| |
| :Don't stress yourself to hard John, there has been no hostile actions taken other then words. The LDS and LoBo all want to remain peaceful at all possible, but when you got a thorn in yourside that continues to be a pain.. sometimes you just want to pull it out. There shouldn't be any war or trouble between us, we are just getting irritated about the whole situation. At this moment we have more important matters to deal with then Bangadesh, the suburb has been under pretty heavy attack by the Drunken Dead. I believe they are extreme zergers, plus they use zombie spies to target their attacks, its been rough but nowhere as bad as the Big Bash, but zergers can be deadly. -- [[User:Joe Riggs|Joe Riggs]] 17:59, 6 October 2006 (BST)
| |
|
| |
| Hey, dont worry about it. Im not too worried about Kleptocracy. My main focus is on the recent rise of attacks that seem to be coordinated by the [[Drunken Dead]]. I suspect a few zombie spys involved in relaying information. But hear this, if any of Kleptocracy respond with an attack, we '''will''' fight back, using the proper bounty call-out, Rogues gallery, etc. and such. But for now, I would like to offer a stand-still, or truce. I think that if barracading info graffiti started showing up, and not being sprayed over, then that would be a great first step towards peace between Human Groups in Lockettside. What do you guys say? --[[User:azn4life|azn4life]] 8:23, 6 October 2006 (BST)
| |
|
| |
| :Hi guys, good to hear from you! Good luck in handling the new threat, at least things are getting more interesting in Lockettside... *grin* BTW, if you still want your groups to become allies with the [[DEM]] (and I can't see why that wouldn't be possible), drop a post in the "Human Groups" section, [http://z14.invisionfree.com/Brainstock/index.php?showforum=4 here]. Just introduce yourselve, add a few links (to Wiki, for instance) and we'll take it from there... I'll put in a good word, of course... Oh, Azn4life, you had my e-mail address, right? Could you please pass it on to Riggs, if you still have it? Regards, --[[User:John Cannonfodder|John Cannonfodder]] 16:11, 7 October 2006 (BST)
| |
|
| |
| So, what about the proof I have posted in the discussion wiki page of the Black Mesa? That's a screenshot of one of that group killing one of our operatives. And another screenshot of his profile. And even worse, we the Museum Caretakers had a deal with the Black Mesa of no aggression! Being a PKer is bad enough. But PKing people from another group when you had a deal... That's even worse. That's like, below of the ground. Shame on you, Black Mesa! And the rest of us... If you have this anti-PK policy, will you help us? We are a not violent group and don't want to get into retaliation. Even though we get constantly PKed and bullied by the Black Mesa, only because we don't follow their dictatorial orders (who died and made them majors of Lockettside?) --[[User:Eek x|Eek x]] 17:08, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
| |
|
| |
| == PK'ers ==
| |
|
| |
| As it stands, we still have a huge PK'er problem. We suspect actually that 75% of the main PK'ers are actually the same person but proving it won't be terribly easy.
| |
|
| |
| If anyone wants to help, bring a character to club frankland, within a week you'll have a good idea of who the main PK'ers are - maybe you want to kill em yourselves - god knows most are KOS on RG. But maybe you just want to spread the word that there is a very real cancer in Lockettside that does need to be adressed.
| |
|
| |
| As it stands right now we're chilling out in Club Frankland simply because it takes the PK'ers 30+AP to kill us, and us sub20 AP to revive, heal and get a new syringe.... (living next to pursey is handy :-) ). Regardless of how stupid this makes the PK'ers look, it wouldn't hurt for a few people to come and shoot them from time to time.
| |
|
| |
| --[[User:DariusAPB|DariusAPB]] 13:12, 20 October 2007 (BST)
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| 30+ AP to kill you? What are they using baseball bats?
| |
|
| |
| Funny stuff.. --[[User:Roland|Roland]] 22:10, 8 June 2008 (BST)
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| Wow, not much going on here on the Lockettside wiki page. Who thinks they're running things these days? I want to know because I hope your name is Jimmy, and I can come kill you. The Valkcows are being fairly passive.--[[User:Sarah Silverman|Sarah Silverman]] 22:37, 24 July 2008 (BST)
| |
|
| |
| == Removed News ==
| |
|
| |
| ====February 26====
| |
| Major incoming Horde!The Mall tour 09 is almost at our doorstep...everyone to the fight!--[[User:Archaon james|Archaon james]] 22:15, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
| |
|
| |
|
| ===February 2009===
| | If you are a civilian, I suggest you go to revive points to rest and when you are revived, do not try to kill zeds but revive them. Do not waste all your points in doing so but at least try to revive 1-3 people per day. In doing so, we can get the civilian population up again. The game is no longer fun or has any meaning if everyone is a zed. Stay strong civilians! [http://urbandead.com/profile.cgi?id=1704362 Synria]02:12, 14 May 2011 (PST) |
| The [[Mall Tour 2009]] slowly approaches [[Tompson Mall]] and its survivors who have barricaded and prepped themselves in and around the Mall. Survivors in the area have a sense of confidence that they will last longer than other malls, while the zombies probably don't care what the survivors think and just want something to eat.--[[User:Adobewedge|Adobewedge]] 16:18, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
| |
|
| |
|
| ===March 2009=== | | == Storing groups section == |
| ====March 7<sup>th</sup>====
| |
| Cheeke NT in Ruddlebank has fallen. Anyone got news on the buildings in Lockettside?--[[User:Fausta Gummings|Fausta Gummings]] 01:03, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
| |
|
| |
|
| :Yup. Pursey NT is still standing, though attacked and breached twice today by our loving Zombie Fans. A few more defenders in Pursey will always be appreciated. -- [[User:Lynx7725|Lynx7725]] 14:32, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
| | The groups section has been removed from the page as part of the [[GSGM 2013]]. It has been copied below. {{User:Bob Moncrief/Sig}} 17:42, 16 August 2013 (BST) |
|
| |
|
| == '''[[EVIL]]''' WAS HERE == | | ===Survivor groups=== |
| | <i>Groups must be listed at stats page</i> |
|
| |
|
| We're going to torture you for a little while [[Lockettside]].... but not to fear,.... it'll all be over soon!!! -[[User:Poodle of doom|Poodle of doom]] 00:38, 15 October 2009 (BST)
| | '''Lockettside Boys''' |
|
| |
|
| {{Scared}}
| | The [[Lockettside Boys]] are a rag tag gang of survivors that have dedicated their lives to the protection of their suburb, as well as one another. Or to quote a member - "The world should be shitting its pants that there is a group of people this messed up that can work together!". Drop by [[Club Frankland]] if you fancy some karaoke or beer drinking. |
