Talk:NWO

Currently we're holding discussions here for recruitment, events, ideas for group direction and anything else.

General Discussion

2 accounts

this is cyber opposition's old account. I give cyber opposition permission to do whatever he wants with my created pages and whatnot if none believes me. sorry for any confusion. I lost the password to this account and recovered it. H4ppy 24 7 11:22, 23 August 2013 (BST)

bitch tits H4ppy 24 7 11:23, 23 August 2013 (BST)
This is in fact my old account. -.- 11:38, 23 August 2013 (BST)

CheckUser begs to differ. ᚱᛁᚹᛖᚾᚨᚾᛏ 02:20, 24 August 2013 (BST)

check user? dude I've moved if you're checking IPs. H4ppy 24 7 10:28, 25 August 2013 (BST)

If you'd like to confirm that, you can do so by posting with the CyberOpposition account from your new location. —Aichon— 17:40, 26 August 2013 (BST)

what new locations? Idk why this has to be complicated. I use my H4ppy account for my phone. -.- 23:49, 26 August 2013 (BST)

You said you moved, so I was saying you could post from wherever you moved to, but it sounds like that doesn't apply here. Instead, the way you'd confirm it would be to log on as Happy from your computer and make an edit somewhere, after which time you could go back to being logged in as Cyber.

And I didn't intend to complicate things. All I was trying to provide was some information on how you could confirm your identity, but doing so is entirely optional, since at this point the worst that can come of your identity being unconfirmed is that we end up having to force you to confirm it if someone accuses one of your accounts of impersonating the other, which would honestly be a bigger waste of sysop time than yours, since I feel as if we have no reason to doubt what you're saying. —Aichon— 00:52, 27 August 2013 (BST)

I certainly hope so. I could have done worse things besides openly admitting to having two accounts. -.- 00:54, 27 August 2013 (BST)

Recruitment

People who wish to join can post they're profile links here. Please change your group box to NWO to be accepted. 'CyberOpposition 19:28, 28 February 2013 (UTC)'.

Stalker Program?

So the program was cancelled? . Now what pretext shall I use to send my group after yours? Perhaps I need to insult your honor, or you need to do likewise with us. I'll begin. You guys aren't PKers, you're nothing but PreKers. There. Now your turn. ~ _{16:03, 26 August 2013 (UTC)}

-- 16:31, 26 August 2013 (BST)

Hi,stfu.5...4...3...2...1...thank you for complying--PayneTrain^(NWO/FU) 16:20, 26 August 2013 (BST)

That's a start, but I know you can do better. ~ _{16:28, 26 August 2013 (UTC)}

I don't feel like wasting that much of my energy on something so pathetic as you,maybe later p'mkin--PayneTrain^(NWO/FU) 16:33, 26 August 2013 (BST)

Weird.. is that supposed to be an insult? Err.. try again? And who's this ice burn? A rapper or some sort? --Ayu Milady ^{NWO member} 18:11, 26 August 2013 (BST)

ok vapor, if you wanna pick fights, don't do it here. i will deleted people who don't have anything better to do. H4ppy 24 7 20:18, 26 August 2013 (BST)

Well if not here, then where? This seemed the most relevant place to discuss that Stalker Program thing. What is an "uncooperative PKer group" and how could a group such as NWO prevent coordinated PKers actions? You do know that infamy is a PKers bread and butter, right? Some even announce their location publicly (see DAFFODILS) and embrace the challenges that come with it. You might know something about that, though since you have also publicy announced your location. Except you're not in Williamsville, are you? At least not that our scouts could find. By all appearances, NWO was scattered by a PKer group numbering less than ten, and only an echo of NWO remains there; some poorly placed Grafitti and a wiki page claiming that which it has no right to claim. Let me know when your group is ready to accept some challenges, and not just propagate some Talker Program. ~ _{22:37, 26 August 2013 (UTC)}

yes, the stalked program was cancelled because there was no support from other groups. now the williamsville loyalty act doesn't mean we're obligated to sit in one building or suburb to make things easy for pkers. some of our players are 2 to 3 suburbs away from williamsville scouting cobras locations and backing them further away from our headquarters.the point is that we're reducing casualties by increasing our own reach. cobra isn't strategically spreading us out because we'll be back to our suburb if they leave. if they require being escorted out, then it will happen naturally. this is a mixed organization as well. meaning we can death cult and play zombies during troll sprees like this. if cobra decides to stay around our territory, we will deal with it appropriately. H4ppy 24 7 23:13, 26 August 2013 (BST)

uncooperative pker groups are considered those who do not value the williamsville loyalty act. instead of a stalker program, we will expand our divisions into seperate groups entirely. this will add more clarity for those outside the group. H4ppy 24 7 23:22, 26 August 2013 (BST)

"lol we'll be zombies" It's like the second coming of Axe Hack...--RadicalWhig 23:45, 26 August 2013 (BST)

It's probably best if you do. It sounds like you have one group with multiple goals, yet members have access to all information regarding thos goals. If that's true, then those are muddied waters indeed. I'll be blunt. My group does want to attack your group. My intention was to make a home for ourslves in your area of operation for a time (from Buckley to Tompson and Marven for good measure), but when our scouts arrived, you had already fled. It sounds li,e we need to let you sort out your little identity crisis, wait to see if you intend to actually protrct the locals as you claim, and maybe come back to you later if you're up to a challenge. Don't expect some friendly confrintation with rules of engagement or oddball victory conditions. A time and a place is all I'll agree to. Just let me know when you're ready. ~ _{00:13, 27 August 2013 (UTC)}

I just haven't implemented the division and mergers of NWO. The group is more open source then you would think. Meaning just because FoD wants to attack us, doesn't mean anyone will want to play with a group that has been vulgar and rude towards us in the past. A division will in fact happen after Cobra is done and the williamsville loyalty act might or might not be enforced afterwards. This is my offer, we will participate in a friendly "NWO vs FoD" battle if their is a truce afterwards. Meaning you guys can't be dick heads during or after the event. The only reason I would voluntarily participate in an event like this would be to establish good relations and an interesting event. I'm sorry, but you guys will have to get over your dislike for me and my group for us to participate. -.- 00:31, 27 August 2013 (BST)

I don't think you truly understand what you're asking of me, so I'll enlighten you. There has been exactly one group in the history of FoD to successfully achieve a truce with us. That would be Philosophe Knights, and that truce has been broken once before. It was achieved not by some one-off, medicocre excuse for a friendly colaboration. Their philosophy, good will, and service to our shared goals is what brought about our bond. If that is your goal with us, you are either grossly misinformed, dilusional or both. It is exactly our dislike for you that urges in our hunt and won't so easily "get over it" nor enter any modicum of friendliness. Perhaps we'll leave the battlefield with a bit more respect for you than before, and perhaps not. That is all that you can expect from us, as it is with any other group that we engage. ~ _{01:06, 27 August 2013 (UTC)}

I know what I'm asking, I just figured it was worth a shot. Fine, I don't give a rats ass what you do. Hope you don't get as butthurt as Cobra is about screenshots. -.- 01:20, 27 August 2013 (BST)