UDWiki:Administration/Demotions: Difference between revisions
Rosslessness (talk | contribs) |
|||
Line 62: | Line 62: | ||
Er, whats the precedence for an op who ask to be demoted in a fit of drunken hilarity to be given back his powers, and maybe a punishment for his stupidity?? God damn it 73. >< --[[¯\(°_o)/¯|<span style="color: DarkMagenta"> ¯\(°_o)/</span>]][[User_talk:Suicidalangel|<span style="color: DarkTurquoise">¯</span>]] 23:06, 2 January 2010 (UTC) | Er, whats the precedence for an op who ask to be demoted in a fit of drunken hilarity to be given back his powers, and maybe a punishment for his stupidity?? God damn it 73. >< --[[¯\(°_o)/¯|<span style="color: DarkMagenta"> ¯\(°_o)/</span>]][[User_talk:Suicidalangel|<span style="color: DarkTurquoise">¯</span>]] 23:06, 2 January 2010 (UTC) | ||
:It's been five months since you're last re-promotion. You could just run again on A/PM. {{User:Linkthewindow/Sig}} 23:39, 2 January 2010 (UTC) | |||
'''Vouch''' Meets all the basic criteria. --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 23:08, 2 January 2010 (UTC) | '''Vouch''' Meets all the basic criteria. --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 23:08, 2 January 2010 (UTC) | ||
{{:UDWiki:Administration/Sysop Check|Sysop Activity Check}} | {{:UDWiki:Administration/Sysop Check|Sysop Activity Check}} |
Revision as of 23:39, 2 January 2010
This page is for system operators to request a demotion of status, or for enaction of demotion due to long-term inactivity. The act of demotion is restricted to those with bureaucrat status, and as such system operators will need to request their demotion here.
Guidelines for Demotion Requests
Request
System operators who wish to request demotion must consider these things before applying.
- Reason for demotion - As demotions cannot be reversed unless the user goes through promotions page again, the user is asked to make sure that they are making the correct decision when applying for demotion.
After a system operator has submitted his or her demotion request, the active Bureaucrats will review it, and after reaching a unanimous decision, choose to either demote the system operator deny his or her request. After action has been taken, the request will be moved to the archive.
Inactivity
main article: Policy Text
- A sysop that hasn't made any edit in four months will be warned, on their talk page, by a Bureaucrat, that they face demotion of their sysop powers in one week, if they remain inactive.
- One week after the warning has been placed, dependant on the actions of the sysop, the Bureaucrat will decide whether or not to carry out the demotion.
- This is to avoid, for example, the unlikely case of a sysop simply making a single edit with the aim of avoiding the demotion.
- The Bureaucrat is trusted and bound to make a fair decision, and not to demote a sysop who clearly demonstrates a return to activity on the wiki.
- Any demonstrable abuse of this power by a Bureaucrat, however unlikely, could (as with any other abuse of specific powers) be grounds for a Misconduct case.
- If the sysop makes no response at all to the warnings, they must be demoted.
Requests for demotion still needing to be processed
Recent Actions
Older actions can be found in the archive.
User:Suicidalangel
Thankfully those faggots over in Red Rum couldn't get their shit together to try and meat-puppet me into 'crat, so I ain't gotta worry about that. I want to be a regular user again, and that way I can leave at anytime without feeling guilt. Also, this way leaves no reason for anyone to call me back when I do eventually leave.
inb4thad. ;) -- ¯\(°_o)/¯ 21:38, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
- No SA! You better give me my money! -- Adward 21:41, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
- Noooes! If I spam your talkpage up, will you take me to arbitration and stay longer? --Thadeous Oakley 22:12, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
- JESUS FUCKING CHRIST IS EVERYONE GOING TO MISINTERPRET THAT FUCKING PART? I AM NOT LEAVING YET, I GOT SHIT TO DO. Someday, yes, just like most users do (except box and cb, addicted freaks they be!), just not in the next few months. Hot damn. :/ -- ¯\(°_o)/¯ 22:17, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
- We just like annoying you.-- Adward 22:29, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
- JESUS FUCKING CHRIST IS EVERYONE GOING TO MISINTERPRET THAT FUCKING PART? I AM NOT LEAVING YET, I GOT SHIT TO DO. Someday, yes, just like most users do (except box and cb, addicted freaks they be!), just not in the next few months. Hot damn. :/ -- ¯\(°_o)/¯ 22:17, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
Demote the cunt ;)--GANG Giles Sednik CAPD 22:23, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
- Indeed :D -- Adward 22:29, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
Dammit, SA, I was all ready to vouch you on your next re-evaluation. You can't leave yet! Your work isn't finished!--Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 22:26, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
Are you sure? Linkthewindow Talk 01:54, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
You sure, SA? Like, absolutely positively? --
02:47, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
fuck you SA >:( Cyberbob Talk 06:16, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
Processed then. Thanks for the help over the past year bud. --
08:29, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
- No problem. Maybe now I can get more done without having to deal with making semi-unbiased decisions about shit! :D -- ¯\(°_o)/¯ 08:32, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
But, but, why? Demotions are my thing! --RosslessnessWant a Location Image? 11:04, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
I made a drunken oopsie...
Er, whats the precedence for an op who ask to be demoted in a fit of drunken hilarity to be given back his powers, and maybe a punishment for his stupidity?? God damn it 73. >< -- ¯\(°_o)/¯ 23:06, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
- It's been five months since you're last re-promotion. You could just run again on A/PM. Linkthewindow Talk 23:39, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
Vouch Meets all the basic criteria. --RosslessnessWant a Location Image? 23:08, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
Sysop Activity Check
User | Position | Last Contribution | Seat Available |
---|---|---|---|
A Helpful Little Gnome (Contribs) | Bureaucrat | 2021-10-29 | 2021-12-01 |
DanceDanceRevolution (Contribs) | Bureaucrat | 2021-10-28 | 2021-12-01 |
Rosslessness (Contribs) | Sysop | 2021-10-14 | N/A |
Stelar (Contribs) | Sysop | 2021-10-29 | N/A |
Total Sysops: 4 (excluding Kevan, LeakyBocks and Urbandead)
Last updated at: 03:58, 28 October 2021 (UTC)