UDWiki:Administration/Demotions: Difference between revisions

From The Urban Dead Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 48: Line 48:
:::Ouch, looks like I scored a hit {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 08:25, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
:::Ouch, looks like I scored a hit {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 08:25, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
::::Because I responded with a negative comment? Gee, color me fucking surprised. I said something to insult someone. You've obviously said something so witty that I have no other response. That, or I always say shit like that. But I guess when your head is so far up your own ass you think anything you say is important as long as I respond. But even if I didn't respond you'd still think you "won". In fact nothing I could do would convince you otherwise. In each scenario you'd still view it as me being hurt by what you said. If I tried to remedy the situation you'd say the same thing, if I insulted you, said something random and idiotic, linked you to a rickroll, changed the subject, etc. Why is this? Because you're a complete and utter fucking moron and nothing of value was lost with you getting demoted. Now do everyone a favor and go back to uni, flunk out, and then go on welfare because the real world is too tough. --[[User:Saromu|Sonny Corleone]] <sup>[[DORIS]] [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4pXfHLUlZf4 I jizzed in my pants]  [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=91a8pHj7V9k pr0n]</sup> 09:10, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
::::Because I responded with a negative comment? Gee, color me fucking surprised. I said something to insult someone. You've obviously said something so witty that I have no other response. That, or I always say shit like that. But I guess when your head is so far up your own ass you think anything you say is important as long as I respond. But even if I didn't respond you'd still think you "won". In fact nothing I could do would convince you otherwise. In each scenario you'd still view it as me being hurt by what you said. If I tried to remedy the situation you'd say the same thing, if I insulted you, said something random and idiotic, linked you to a rickroll, changed the subject, etc. Why is this? Because you're a complete and utter fucking moron and nothing of value was lost with you getting demoted. Now do everyone a favor and go back to uni, flunk out, and then go on welfare because the real world is too tough. --[[User:Saromu|Sonny Corleone]] <sup>[[DORIS]] [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4pXfHLUlZf4 I jizzed in my pants]  [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=91a8pHj7V9k pr0n]</sup> 09:10, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
:::::allow me to explain exactly how little I care *writes nearly 200 words on the subject* NO BUT SERIOUSLY I DON'T CARE {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 12:57, 12 March 2010 (UTC)


==Recent Actions==
==Recent Actions==

Revision as of 12:57, 12 March 2010

Template:Moderationnav

This page is for system operators to request a demotion of status, or for enaction of demotion due to long-term inactivity. The act of demotion is restricted to those with bureaucrat status, and as such system operators will need to request their demotion here.

Guidelines for Demotion Requests

Request

System operators who wish to request demotion must consider these things before applying.

  • Reason for demotion - As demotions cannot be reversed unless the user goes through promotions page again, the user is asked to make sure that they are making the correct decision when applying for demotion.

After a system operator has submitted his or her demotion request, the active Bureaucrats will review it, and after reaching a unanimous decision, choose to either demote the system operator deny his or her request. After action has been taken, the request will be moved to the archive.

Inactivity

Crystal Clear app xmag.png main article: Policy Text

  • A sysop that hasn't made any edit in four months will be warned, on their talk page, by a Bureaucrat, that they face demotion of their sysop powers in one week, if they remain inactive.
  • One week after the warning has been placed, dependant on the actions of the sysop, the Bureaucrat will decide whether or not to carry out the demotion.
  • This is to avoid, for example, the unlikely case of a sysop simply making a single edit with the aim of avoiding the demotion.
  • The Bureaucrat is trusted and bound to make a fair decision, and not to demote a sysop who clearly demonstrates a return to activity on the wiki.
  • Any demonstrable abuse of this power by a Bureaucrat, however unlikely, could (as with any other abuse of specific powers) be grounds for a Misconduct case.
  • If the sysop makes no response at all to the warnings, they must be demoted.

Requests for demotion still needing to be processed

Cyberbob

Uni is picking up more than I expected it to, so things are not looking like they're going to pick up on the activity front any time soon. I don't want to become another Swiers so I'll just cut things off now. Sorry for making everyone go through the rigamarole of my confirmation process recently. Cyberbob  Talk  13:06, 10 March 2010 (UTC)

No, cyberbob! Don't go! We neeeed you!--Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 13:08, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
It's midnight in Kangarooland, he's drunk and forgotten that SA already did the demote while drunk and repromotion schtick recently. -- To know the face of God is to know madness....Praise knowledge! Mischief! Mayhem! The Rogues Gallery!. <== DDR Approved Editor 13:18, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
This statement is backed up by the fact that he posted his demotion request in the wrong place.--Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 13:21, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
Not drunk, posted it in the wrong spot as I've never paid a huge amount of attention to this page before Cyberbob  Talk  13:28, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
Ah well. Just wait for a sysop to come and demote you then. :( Now we'll never have Cyberbob as crat...--Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 13:32, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
:( We're coming to get you, Barbara 14:22, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
I'd be a shit crat anyways Cyberbob  Talk  16:20, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
We'll never know if you're demoted, which is why the 'crats should just deny your demotion. Besides, uni is temporary, but UD is forever. Aichon 18:01, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
For-ever.... stay here.... for-ever... --Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 18:10, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
You honestly can't be a worse crat then...OH SNAP. Too bad you have to go though. I guess I can at the very least wish you the best of luck with Uni and other future endeavors. --Umbrella-White.pngThadeous OakleyUmbrella-White.png 22:21, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
If you're going to be this overly retaliatory just because I tear you and your terrible group apart on a regular basis, at leased put these stupid comments on a talk page, please. -- 22:27, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
see talk page

You made us go through the whole re-evaluation thing for nothing? I feel dead inside. --RosslessnessWant a Location Image? 15:31, 10 March 2010 (UTC)

Anyway. If things get tough, consider a ban request as well. Worked wonders when I was in a similar position. :0 --RosslessnessWant a Location Image? 17:58, 10 March 2010 (UTC)

Alrighty, you know it's coming: you sure? --

22:13, 10 March 2010 (UTC)

Yes. I might see if I can work up the enthusiasm to come back after exams at the end of the year but I don't want to linger around here like a bad smell for all those months. Cyberbob  Talk  01:21, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
Fair enough, a respectable choice to make. Good luck in your studies too Bob and don't be afraid to return sooner if stuff changes? In the meantime I've processed your demotion. -- 01:29, 11 March 2010 (UTC)

HAHAHAHAHAHAHA! I hope you flunk out. >:D --Sonny Corleone DORIS I jizzed in my pants pr0n 22:47, 11 March 2010 (UTC)

Misery loves company? Cyberbob  Talk  05:17, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
Cliche phrases love faggots? --Sonny Corleone DORIS I jizzed in my pants pr0n 07:42, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
Ouch, looks like I scored a hit Cyberbob  Talk  08:25, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
Because I responded with a negative comment? Gee, color me fucking surprised. I said something to insult someone. You've obviously said something so witty that I have no other response. That, or I always say shit like that. But I guess when your head is so far up your own ass you think anything you say is important as long as I respond. But even if I didn't respond you'd still think you "won". In fact nothing I could do would convince you otherwise. In each scenario you'd still view it as me being hurt by what you said. If I tried to remedy the situation you'd say the same thing, if I insulted you, said something random and idiotic, linked you to a rickroll, changed the subject, etc. Why is this? Because you're a complete and utter fucking moron and nothing of value was lost with you getting demoted. Now do everyone a favor and go back to uni, flunk out, and then go on welfare because the real world is too tough. --Sonny Corleone DORIS I jizzed in my pants pr0n 09:10, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
allow me to explain exactly how little I care *writes nearly 200 words on the subject* NO BUT SERIOUSLY I DON'T CARE Cyberbob  Talk  12:57, 12 March 2010 (UTC)

Recent Actions

Older actions can be found in the archive.


Sysop Activity Check

User Position Last Contribution Seat Available
A Helpful Little Gnome (Contribs) Bureaucrat 2021-10-29 2021-12-01
DanceDanceRevolution (Contribs) Bureaucrat 2021-10-28 2021-12-01
Rosslessness (Contribs) Sysop 2021-10-14 N/A
Stelar (Contribs) Sysop 2021-10-29 N/A

Total Sysops: 4 (excluding Kevan, LeakyBocks and Urbandead)

Last updated at: 03:58, 28 October 2021 (UTC)