UDWiki:Administration/Promotions

Shortcut:
A/PM

Candidates still requiring vouches

User:Lithedarkangel

Li was always a wiki lover. He is a good guy, has been around for almost a year, and has never been warned. He plays a prominent role in current Wiki Projects.He is a total achiever, and if he was given System Operator abilities, he could really make use of his talents. He tries his best to avoid all wiki drama as well. If you don't know who he is, please abstain, and don't vote against him. That just wouldn't be fair.

http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php/Special:Contributions/Lithedarkangel

If anyone has any questions, I'm sure Li will be able to answer them as soon as he sees this (he stalks the recent changes page.) --Haliman - Talk 00:34, 5 January 2009 (UTC)

Response: I'm honored for the proposal, thanks hal. I accept this nomination. Now with the responses...

Popularity:I agree I'm not that popular on the wiki... maybe because I'm not part of vandalism.

Drama?: About that bit... It's mostly because I do other stuff. Of course that being a Sysop will require with me dealing with that kind of situations and I have no problem with that. Furthermore, I have a great patience when dealing with drama.

Vandalizing: Me?... Nice one... I would never do such a thing... really... if I do.. ban me.

Sysop?: Well, it will help with all the administration I have to wait for. I can help with that work too.

I hope this is enough...If not keep asking. --LithedarkangelMeth!^{The Great Meth Man} 01:59, 5 January 2009 (UTC)

---

• Vouch - Obviously :) --Haliman - Talk 00:38, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
• Against - "If you don't know who he is, please abstain, and don't vote against him." I'll do whatever the hell I like, buddy. Sysop candidates should be well-known figures as the public spotlight will always be on them once they're promoted and going from obscurity straight into that kind of environment isn't a good thing. Besides, there's nothing he's doing that requires sysop abilities and functions that do require said abilities aren't difficult in any sense of the word. --HAHAHA DISREGARD THAT, I SUCK COCKS 00:43, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
• Against - Needs moar experience and renown. I should be able to come back from a multi-month long break and know who you are within a few weeks.-- dǝǝɥs oʇ ɯɐds: sʎɐʍ1ɐ! 00:50, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
• Abstain - Firstly, you should contact him first and get him to come here and say he wants to be a sysop, otherwise you won't get much support. Secondly, I think Lithe's work in the last few weeks has been awesome, and being a sysop could allow him to skip pointless bureaucracy and do what he needs to do. The only real problem i have is this thing about avoiding drama, i don't see that as a good trait, a/vb and a/m are natural drama machines and i don't think we need more sysops who are happy to not get involved in those areas. If he comes over and makes a statement i might be inclined to change my view, not that you really want my support anyway, coz we all know what that'll do to boxy's opinion of you.--xoxo 00:57, 5 January 2009 (UTC)

  lol bias. :D -- dǝǝɥs oʇ ɯɐds: sʎɐʍ1ɐ! 00:58, 5 January 2009 (UTC)

  My, someone's feeling a little sore. --HAHAHA DISREGARD THAT, I SUCK COCKS 01:17, 5 January 2009 (UTC)

• Abstain - I like Li, I think he's a great guy, but he's just not prominent enough, and he doesn't need op privileges to do what he's doing now. I'm abstaining until I see evidence that sways me one way or another. --Pestolence^(talk) 01:05, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
• Provisional Abstain - The user needs to indicate a desire to be a sysop, they havn't on this page and cannot be promoted until they do. Also I'd be wary of the conflict of interest given their group's recent and on going wiki drama. -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 01:07, 5 January 2009 (UTC)

  Re: - To be fair, the UBCS has never vandalized an Umbrella page. --Haliman - Talk 01:09, 5 January 2009 (UTC)

  You'll notice I say conflict of interest and not potential vandalism concerns. -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 01:16, 5 January 2009 (UTC)

• who? - i guess cyberbob already said it, potential sysops should be users known by the public. I never heard of this guy (or girl), and by the looks of the others votes in here, i am not alone in that. --People's Commissar Hagnat ^{talk mod} 01:57, 5 January 2009 (UTC)

  onoze ur agreein wit a troll!11111 --Cyberbob 02:11, 5 January 2009 (UTC)

Archived Promotions

• Complete list of Promotion Requests
• Successful Promotions Candidacies
• Unsuccessful Promotions Candidacies
• Unaccepted Nominations
• Withdrawn Promotions Candidacies