UDWiki:Administration/Vandal Banning/Archive/2012 04

Template:A/VBsub

<div id="shortcut" class="noprint" style="border: 1px solid #999; background:

• A signed datestamp.

For accountability purposes, we ask that you record in your request your user name and the time you lodged the report.

• Please report at the top.

There's confl

. D^ANCED^ANCER^EVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 00:12, 14 April 2012 (BST)

It was pretty stupid, huh. Especially the part where he admitted he was just out trying to get to me. Meh, ops should just rule however they see fit. Not like he has ever listened to logic. ~ _{00:48, 14 April 2012 (UTC)}

See right now is where I could be ruling vandalism, then voting to keep him around when the perma vote arises in the future. Oh well. 00:51, 14 April 2012 (BST)

I did it to get on you, but that doesn't mean that I knew it wasn't allowed. Generaloberst 8:28, 14 April 2012 (BST)

Vandalism. Tampering with vandalism votes isn't a newb mistake, and it isn't something properly dealt with with some talk page wrist-slapping. Hardball is the only viable course of action in a case as severe as this one. Principiis obsta. Sero medicina parata, cum mala per longas convaluere moras. -- Spiderzed█ 01:22, 14 April 2012 (BST)

God, I even explained in the describtion of the edit why I made the edit, it says "good faith edit. vapor has been demoted so the vote doesn't count anymore.)" with your "not a newb mistake". Describtion clearly says that the edit was made in good faith and that I didn't know it was not allowed. Oh yeah, this case is so severe, watch out, next time I will use gas. Better have me banned. Generaloberst 8:26, 14 April 2012 (BST)

User:Krazy_Monkey

{{v|Krazy_Monkey|Not Vandali:Generaloberst|Generaloberst]] 19:12, 9 April 2012 (BST)

The bunny is there for < or pokemonian evolution? -- Cheese 19:07, 9 April 2012 (BST)

Pearl Jamian. 19:10, 9 April 2012 (BST)