UDWiki talk:Administration/Arbitration/Iscariot vs Boxy: Difference between revisions
From The Urban Dead Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
(New page: Not willing to go and check exactly the edits I do want to point out that as a result of this Vandal banning case (quoted in its entirety) that Edits may be done on ANY group (member or no...) |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Possible point== | |||
Not willing to go and check exactly the edits I do want to point out that as a result of this Vandal banning case (quoted in its entirety) that Edits may be done on ANY group (member or not) as long as the edits are accurate. | Not willing to go and check exactly the edits I do want to point out that as a result of this Vandal banning case (quoted in its entirety) that Edits may be done on ANY group (member or not) as long as the edits are accurate. | ||
[[User:JonnyFive]] | |||
{{vndl|JonnyFive}} <br> | {{vndl|JonnyFive}} <br> | ||
For [http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php?title=Dunell_Hills_Police_Department&diff=1122157&oldid=1116147 this] edit. Accurate or not, Its up to a group member to do the editing. [[User:Conndraka|Conndraka]]<sup>[[Moderation|mod]] [[User_talk:Conndraka|T]][[DHPD]] [[Coalition for Fair Tactics|''CFT'']]</sup> 18:59, 27 April 2008 (BST) | For [http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php?title=Dunell_Hills_Police_Department&diff=1122157&oldid=1116147 this] edit. Accurate or not, Its up to a group member to do the editing. [[User:Conndraka|Conndraka]]<sup>[[Moderation|mod]] [[User_talk:Conndraka|T]][[DHPD]] [[Coalition for Fair Tactics|''CFT'']]</sup> 18:59, 27 April 2008 (BST) | ||
| Line 11: | Line 13: | ||
:::If the minor editing of the group page continues in a way that I think can be considered to be for annoyance value, then yeah, it may be ruled as vandalism... but not simply this <small><span style="color:DodgerBlue">-- [[User:Boxy|boxy]] <sup>[[User talk:Boxy|talk]] • [[UDWiki:Image Categorisation|i]]</sup> 03:24 29 April 2008 (BST)</span></small> | :::If the minor editing of the group page continues in a way that I think can be considered to be for annoyance value, then yeah, it may be ruled as vandalism... but not simply this <small><span style="color:DodgerBlue">-- [[User:Boxy|boxy]] <sup>[[User talk:Boxy|talk]] • [[UDWiki:Image Categorisation|i]]</sup> 03:24 29 April 2008 (BST)</span></small> | ||
<br> [[User:Conndraka|Conndraka]]<sup>[[Moderation|mod]] [[User_talk:Conndraka|T]][[AZM]] [[Coalition for Fair Tactics|''CFT'']]</sup> 01:32, 24 December 2008 (UTC) | <br> [[User:Conndraka|Conndraka]]<sup>[[Moderation|mod]] [[User_talk:Conndraka|T]][[AZM]] [[Coalition for Fair Tactics|''CFT'']]</sup> 01:32, 24 December 2008 (UTC) | ||
---- | |||
Revision as of 01:33, 24 December 2008
Possible point
Not willing to go and check exactly the edits I do want to point out that as a result of this Vandal banning case (quoted in its entirety) that Edits may be done on ANY group (member or not) as long as the edits are accurate.
User:JonnyFive
JonnyFive (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss)
For this edit. Accurate or not, Its up to a group member to do the editing. Conndrakamod TDHPD CFT 18:59, 27 April 2008 (BST)
Not vandalism - Good faith, it improved the accuracy of the paragraph. The edit was accurate to what the stats said at that time, and the paragraph was talking about the stats page, not about known members who may not have the exact words "Dunell Hills Police Department" in their profile. -- AHLGTG THE END IS NIGH! 01:33, 28 April 2008 (BST)
- Not vandalism - Read the reporting guidelines, please. "Avoid submitting reports which are petty." --People's Commissar Hagnat [cloned] [mod] 13:03, 28 April 2008 (BST)
- Allright. Its just that I thought that the fact that since the edit in question was not in the NPOV section and that Johny is a member of a group known to Grief the DHPD, that it was innapropriate. I assume this means that anyone can now edit any group page as long as the edit is accurate? Conndrakamod TDHPD CFT 15:28, 28 April 2008 (BST)
- Edit in the means of adding new info, no. Update already existing, yet outdated, information from a reliable source, yes. You could've prevented that by simply saying as of (day) of (month), the DHPD yada yada --People's Commissar Hagnat [cloned] [mod] 15:37, 28 April 2008 (BST)
- If the minor editing of the group page continues in a way that I think can be considered to be for annoyance value, then yeah, it may be ruled as vandalism... but not simply this -- boxy talk • i 03:24 29 April 2008 (BST)
- Allright. Its just that I thought that the fact that since the edit in question was not in the NPOV section and that Johny is a member of a group known to Grief the DHPD, that it was innapropriate. I assume this means that anyone can now edit any group page as long as the edit is accurate? Conndrakamod TDHPD CFT 15:28, 28 April 2008 (BST)
Conndrakamod TAZM CFT 01:32, 24 December 2008 (UTC)
