UDWiki talk:Administration/Sysop Archives/Vantar/2007-11-16 Misconduct

From The Urban Dead Wiki
< UDWiki talk:Administration‎ | Sysop Archives
Revision as of 11:49, 31 January 2008 by Hagnat (talk | contribs) (New page: =Vantar= I don't see an 'expired' policies section, and it wasn't voted on, so it couldn't be accepted or rejected...so this, sir, is just plain crazy. I submit that you are on an irration...)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigationJump to search

Vantar

I don't see an 'expired' policies section, and it wasn't voted on, so it couldn't be accepted or rejected...so this, sir, is just plain crazy. I submit that you are on an irrational vendetta against this policy because everyone's voting for it... except those whom the policy holds accountable.  Nalikill  TALK  E!  W!  M!  USAI  03:46, 16 November 2007 (UTC)

Perhaps creating and using UDWiki:Administration/Policy_Discussion/Archive-that page and chalking this whole affair up to a good faith series of mistakes would be best.  Nalikill  TALK  E!  W!  M!  USAI  03:50, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
I submit that you need to read the guidelines, specifically Rule 4:
It says:
Any discussion which doesn't go to voting in 2 weeks will be archived.
--Cyberbob DORIS CGR U! 03:51, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
"archived" being the key word there. Not accepted, rejected or withdrawn. "ARCHIVED." Hence my suggestion. And I'm sorry if the tone was offensive; I was trying for a more formal tone and it came off looking stupid.  Nalikill  TALK  E!  W!  M!  USAI  03:53, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
It was in the archives, and as Grim said on the main page (thanks again for pointing that one out, Grim) - policies that pass their use-by dates are considered Withdrawn. --Cyberbob DORIS CGR U! 03:54, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
Precedent has them going to withdrawn, not voting.--Karekmaps?! 03:56, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
It was in rejected, hence the confusion... and withdrawn, I suppose would be alright...but I personally think having an archive page would be better than saying withdrawn. But that's just my two cents.  Nalikill  TALK  E!  W!  M!  USAI  03:57, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
Then make a policy, and move it too voting before 2 weeks.--Karekmaps?! 03:58, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
User:Nalikill/Withdrawn to Archive Please help me flesh it out and format it? I can never be long enough to make it look like an actual policy.  Nalikill  TALK  E!  W!  M!  USAI  04:00, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
Withdrawn basically means it never went to voting. Theres no point creating more confusion by adding a fourth archive for the very weak difference between withdrawn and expired policies. --The Grimch U! E! WAT! 04:00, 16 November 2007 (UTC)