UDWiki talk:Featured Articles: Difference between revisions

From The Urban Dead Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 11: Line 11:


I'll throw in [[NecroWatch]], because I think it's a good mix of fluff, encourages survivors to take risks and be proactive, and in its mission tries to get more people to contribute to the Wiki. {{User:Extropymine/sig}} 02:41, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
I'll throw in [[NecroWatch]], because I think it's a good mix of fluff, encourages survivors to take risks and be proactive, and in its mission tries to get more people to contribute to the Wiki. {{User:Extropymine/sig}} 02:41, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
We should probably till we have the criteria up, and the voting page before nominating things. Silly peoples! --{{User:A Helpful Little Gnome/Sig}} 03:06, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 03:06, 18 March 2009

Nomnomnominations

Lets get the show on the road, I guess. Anyone nominate a beautiful article for featured status?

I'll throw a few into the mix that I enjoyed reading.

Maybe even First Siege of Caiger Mall - I think from a historical standpoint it is a good read. DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 02:29, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

I'll throw in NecroWatch, because I think it's a good mix of fluff, encourages survivors to take risks and be proactive, and in its mission tries to get more people to contribute to the Wiki. ~ extropymine Talk | NW | 4Corners 02:41, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

We should probably till we have the criteria up, and the voting page before nominating things. Silly peoples! --  AHLGTG THE END IS NIGH! 03:06, 18 March 2009 (UTC)