User talk:Timid Dan

From The Urban Dead Wiki

Jump to: navigation, search


Regarding your BASELESS accusation of me deleting your vote on the suggestions page:

I went back into the history and it was Blahblahblah who did it you idiot. Before you blame someone examine the history. Edits on one suggestion have absolutely no influence over edits on other suggestions. I am one of the few people who goes out of his way to preserve other peoples work in edit conflicts, and he got me too. I found your accusation to be offensive in the extreme. --Grim s 20:27, 9 March 2006 (GMT)

  • exactly how BASELESS is it if the wiki history shows an edit where you deleted my vote? Timid Dan 21:45, 9 March 2006 (GMT)

John Ember

Hey Dan. Don't know what happened. When I see an Edit Conflict, I back out and make sure to edit the most recent version. Didn't get any conflict messages on that one. I think the wiki software simply fails to catch conflicts sometimes. --John Ember 20:19, 27 March 2006 (BST)

Small Surgery Change

Regarding your vote on that suggestion... be honest I've got no clue what you mean, and I'm usually pretty quick on the uptake... care to explain? because you sparked my interest.--Vista W! 19:43, 10 April 2006 (BST)

Actually, You've made some good points, if you work out from that combined with Small Surgery Change you'd get some interesting mechanics working. It'd be quite nice to see at work. You should cross post it to Andrew McM. It was his suggestion and he likes feedback like that. Are you're going to do something with it yourself?--Vista W! 14:49, 11 April 2006 (BST) (Btw, wordier is good, you've seen what kind of amounts of text I can spew out on the suggestions page, It usually helps the people who bother to read it.)


That Godawful Death Groan suggestion just won't die... And Aushvitz was doing so well for a week or so there, too. Zmobie Jebus is crying in his wine. -Wyndal (talk)-(W!)-(SGP) 14:42, 25 April 2006 (BST)

Molebank BWPD

Thanks for the heads up. I am aware of the situation and am monitoring it. A number of us are working on improving the page in general and providing stricter guidelines on maintaining an RP. While we could not reasonably prevent them from list the RP, however bogus it might be, they can not resonably prevent appropriate cautions that are applied to all RP's equally. --Gilant talk|DEM 16:51, 10 May 2006 (BST)

Conditional damage

Can you explain what's wrong with conditional damage? You may be right that it's no good, but I don't get it. Thanks. --Dan 19:08, 17 May 2006 (BST)


what are you talking about the answer was simple 1 attack the target wih a melee weapon 2 fire a gun at the same target 3 you get an additional 5 points of damage and 20% bonus chance of hitting the target Robbie the king 19:11, 24 May 2006 (BST)

Personal tools