User talk:Vapor

• Talk archive here.
• Talk Archive #2 here.

you might go blind--

bitch 17:34 16 March 2011 (UTC)

I shall cherish them always. These boobies will never be archived. ~ _{20:06, 17 March 2011}

look >--  ▧  ^{: : : : : : : : : : : : : : : :} 12:47, 24 March 2011 (UTC)

Disclaimer

This user does not give a fuck

Da Rules

Add new topics wherever you damn well please or if you're lazy click here. That is unless you are Sexualharrison, in which case, click here

how long...

am i banned for? sorry if i'm breaking a rule for logging in but i just saw the message on my talk page. and sorry for asking on your page but wasn't sure if you'd see my response on my talk page. and if i create a new account, can i "transfer" or copy/paste all of my pages to new pages? or can i continue editing pages under Son of Sin userspace logged in under my new account? i'm totally lost. do i have to create new signatures as well? sheesh...i'd rather be banned for awhile than start over with a new account. →Son of Sin← 19:48, 3 November 2011 (UTC)

Candy

That better be a Rare Candy you're feeding the Mudkip, mate. :P --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ ^{#nerftemplatedsigs} 05:57, 5 November 2011 (UTC)

Considering you're only the second person I've given candy to in-game and the first was a random player I didn't know, yeah I'd say it was rare. May it bring you luck in your Red endeavors. Don't forget to pass it along. Don't eat it, it'll rot or (more likely) break your teeth. Oh wait, do mudkips have teeth? ~ _{06:19, 5 November 2011 (UTC)}

What? It's a rare candy, but not a Rare Candy? Guess it won't increase my level by one. D: --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ ^{#nerftemplatedsigs} 06:24, 5 November 2011 (UTC)

Sorry, but whatever you're referencing it's completely lost on me. I am and old(ish) man, I'm afraid. Enjoy the candy anyhow. ~ _{06:31, 5 November 2011 (UTC)}

Sigh...Too old for Pokemon references, I guess. :( --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ ^{#nerftemplatedsigs} 06:35, 5 November 2011 (UTC)

Aye, that I am. My oldest daughter probably would have caught it. I'm afraid Peekachoos and Mudkips are about where my pokemon knowledge ends. Even then its sparse. ~ _{06:41, 5 November 2011 (UTC)}

?

Im more than happy to end my manhuntingness, if you still need to balance the teams. --Like Moss and The Dude..... 19:25, 6 November 2011 (UTC)

I'd hate to see more drop simply to rebalace things. Let's see how Sailor Moon responds. If we can't get another on Red, I'll step in and join to try to rebalance or if you'd rather switch over instead of dropping altogether that might be better. ~ _{19:33, 6 November 2011 (UTC)}

Birthday coming up = messy weekends, its more of a time available thing. Oh and I hate yon. --Like Moss and The Dude..... 19:50, 6 November 2011 (UTC)

You too, huh? Mine is on the 10th. Its up to you, man. I'd prefer to see you stay on but if you'll be inactive its understandable. Let me know. ~ _{20:01, 6 November 2011 (UTC)}

Ahoy!

Ye be rollin with the FoD now, I'll be happy to see the impression ye leave on the flotsam in this city! --RaddoX 08:19, 23 November 2011 (UTC)

Indeed, I will leave my impression all over this city. The spoiled and overindulgent masses of Malton surely won't soon forget me when I leave my mark. They shall cower in the dark, palms sweating as they grip their pistols, perhaps more prepared for what lurks outside. ~ _{14:08, 23 November 2011 (UTC)}

Text Rape Nonsense

Hi Vapor, I saw your responses on the misconduct case regarding this issue. Any chance you would care to chime in here? http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php/UDWiki_talk:Administration/Policy_Discussion/Text_Rape

Cheers, Gordon 22:33, 24 November 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned Images

File:PMHunt Header.png which you uploaded is currently unused and is subject to deletion if it is older than two weeks. If you wish to ensure that it remains on this wiki then you will need to ensure that it is included in at least one page on this wiki..--A Helpful Little Bot 11:53, 25 November 2011 (UTC)

Axe Hack's Manhunt 5

5 days. --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ ^{#nerftemplatedsigs} 05:04, 27 November 2011 (UTC)

Ms. Pacman

read my disclaimer: if you see my characters in-game, do not lecture me about my wiki opinions ...i am 100% in-character in Malton ...my characters are not text-rapists. →Son of Sin← 23:03, 2 December 2011 (UTC)

in-character: i am harmless, why did you shoot me? → TheSonOfSin ← 23:03, 2 December 2011 (UTC)

Yes. I see. Well, that does place us in an unenviable situation, now doesn't it. You see, we feel some things are best solved through violence. In a completely role-playing sense of course. Hmmm...well now. I guess we'll be seeing you around, Mr. Sin. ~ _{03:49, 3 December 2011 (UTC)}

Cobra forums

No idea what it is you want from us, but I have activated your account. -- Spiderzed█ 19:56, 7 December 2011 (UTC)

Thanks. I needed a way to get a hold of one of your members. Sorry, I'll duck my head in to just say hi. Nothing special. ~ _{20:07, 7 December 2011 (UTC)}

deleted page

The reason I add that information is so people can see it immediately without going to my profile --Krazyxman 01:39, 12 December 2011 (UTC)

It is against the rules unfortunately D^ANCED^ANCER^EVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 01:40, 12 December 2011 (UTC)

ok, i fix it to use user page, sorry for mistake --Krazyxman 01:45, 12 December 2011 (UTC)

Heyo

Still waiting for a reply in the nazi's second vandal case. -- Thadeous Oakley Talk 21:44, 12 December 2011 (UTC)

In hindsight, it probably wasn't my best choice of words. Yeah the guy took it out of context but I probably did as well. Perhaps it was your delivery or perhaps I was just caught up. I see now the point you were making but at the time it made it sound like it was always acceptable practice to resize images whenever anyone damn well pleased. Sorry man. It wasn't shitty advice just a shitty situation. ~ _{21:56, 12 December 2011 (UTC)}

revert

Why did you delete that picture I uploaded? Continuing this behaviour might lead to a warning for Vandalism. Jew. Generaloberst 7:57, 13 December 2011

what in god's fucking name are you talking about D^ANCED^ANCER^EVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 11:25, 13 December 2011 (UTC)

None of your business. Generaloberst 13:25, 13 December 2011 (UTC)

mr craven nazi wannabe is talking about the swastika or other bullshit he added to my header template. subtlety has never been very useful to the nazi's and don't forget we jews invented sarcasm. enjoy your rope. --User:Sexualharrison13:55, 13 December 2011 (bst)

I didn't even edit your page retard. Can you see any edits there? Generaloberst 14:03, 13 December 2011 (UTC)

What you did was modify an image uploaded by harrison and used only on his pages. But I'm sure it was a good faith edit. Knock it off. --Like Moss and The Dude..... 18:15, 13 December 2011 (UTC)

Is it bad faith to upload a picture of swastika? Is it bad faith to upload a picture with that name? Did I edit his page? Generaloberst 21:13, 13 December 2011 (UTC)

Replace dear fellow, replace an image. Specifically when there's a reminder asking you if you wish to replace the existing image. Specifically one so obviously named. I think we both know you're too clever to fall back on the ignorance excuse. --Like Moss and The Dude..... 21:37, 13 December 2011 (UTC)

I saw what happened but the thing is, I hope to fucking god you are trolling. Do you actually literally think what you did is some sort of clever loophole? We pulled shit like this literally 4 years ago with finis. The thing is, what you did is vandalism, not spiderzed, surprise surprise. Must you really fucking fail at everything D^ANCED^ANCER^EVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 23:37, 13 December 2011 (UTC)

PS It's in the upload log, dipshit. D^ANCED^ANCER^EVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 23:37, 13 December 2011 (UTC)

With my IQ is nothing wrong, DDR, it's 130. Of course I know it's bad faith. It's fun to lawyer though, and what's even more fun is the fact that you can't prove that I knew the image was on Harrison's page. It's defenitely a loop in the rules. Stuff was worth all the lulz though. I won't do it again. ;) Generaloberst 8:45, 14 December 2011 (UTC)

It's official, you really are retarded. Thanks for the confirmation D^ANCED^ANCER^EVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 10:15, 14 December 2011 (UTC)

It's nice to see how you always come up with 'conclusions' while you never actually elaborate and then claim to be 'right'. And no, accusations and swearing doesn't help to prove your point DDR. I admit that I knew the image was on the page. I admit that it was bad faith. Though who says that it's impossible that I didn't just coincidentally picked a name of a picture that was already on the wiki, didn't read the warnings that said it was on his page and uploaded it? Not reading warnings happens all the time, even terms of use are often not read. People simply see the upload or agree button and click. Furthermore, creating images on this wiki that already existed happens all the time, so why can't it be coincidence in this case? Ok, it isn't the most standard name, but in court, 99% proof is not proof. At the moment 99% proof is considered proof, then you get all kinds of nasty stuff like innocent death sentences, innocent life enprisonment, etc. How does it feel hearing that from a nazi? And then now you can explain me why in DDR-land people get sentenced for misreading a page and coincidentally picking a name that already existed. This is clearly a loop. Though, given the strong feasibility of vandalism, I would probably have given a soft warning for this myself, I wouldn't have given a 'full' warning because in Generaloberst-land 99% proof isn't proof. The only proof you have is my confession that I knew an image with that name was on the page and read the warnings. Or have you asked Kevan for the logs to see if I checked the source of his page, and then the source of the header? Here you got a nice, clearly elaborated statement. Have a nice day, dumbass. Generaloberst 11:41, 14 December 2011 (UTC)

Text wall, FTW -- boxy 12:01, 14 December 2011 (BST)

Guess I hit a nerve. Too much like Cornholioo, too easy. D^ANCED^ANCER^EVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 12:03, 14 December 2011 (UTC)

Once again, you have absolutely baffled me with your ability to claim something with such staunch factuality when you are absolutely wrong, I actually wonder how you manage it so effectively. I've been here for 4 years, I spent 2 of those years monitoring and categorizing every new image that was uploaded. Uploading images over already existing images is very rare, it does not happen all the time, even less so when it's someone uploading over someone else's image. For the record I have no issue with nazis, I have issue with retards, it just happens with anomalous frequency that they happen to be one in the same nowadays, yourself included. As for the rest, well, just like I don't waste time explaining my statements to the retards who are too ignorant to see why for themselves, I don't have the time nor effort to justify butthurt wailings over reasonable and fair rules that only a handful of people ever see to have an issue with.  D^ANCED^ANCER^EVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 12:03, 14 December 2011 (UTC)

"Generaloberst wakes up on a day and desides to make a new header for harrison. He measures the size of the image and crops out a swastika. Obviously, he uploads it on the wiki with the name 'Harrisonheader.jpg' so he can place it in his own userspace to present it to harrison later. He didn't read the warnings that popped up and simply clicked 'upload'." A nice example for this to happen without any bad faith involved. Justice is never, ever, about what other people think DDR. Justice is about being fair. Justice is about saying 'innocent' even when the majority of the people say guilty. Justice is about saying 'guilty' even when the majority of the people say innocent. You still have a lot to learn, and for that reason I'm done arguing with you for now.

edit/ Oh, and "I have more experience so I am right and you are not" is a very weak argument actually. Generaloberst 12:13, 14 December 2011 (UTC)

You done yet? I want to reply but with the frantic corrections you're making I'm afraid of being edit conflicted. I don't know about you since it's already been established that your ideals are rather retarded when compared with the general populace, but I am a man who thinks that warnings are there for a reason and people who ignore them should be aware of the potential repercussions of ignoring them. When I ignore warnings, which I often do, I do this. Of course, to do that you'd have to be able to take responsibility for your actions and thus far you've shown a fair amount of moral bankruptcy when it comes to managing that, so I won't hold my breath. Any more bleating to do? Or can I get back to my lovely Tooheys? D^ANCED^ANCER^EVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 12:33, 14 December 2011 (UTC)

love triumphs over everything. that is why people like you will always fail and you will always be craven. you hide behind proxies, would never every let us see what you really look like or your real identity. another internet tuff guy for us to play with. thank you for you're input. please keep them coming you make the 20 minutes a day I spend playing this game that more interesting. and Alfred Binet, the IQ test inventor didn’t believe that IQ test scales qualify to measure your intelligence. He neither invented the term “intelligence quotient” (IQ) nor supported its numerical expression. After completing the foremost IQ test scale, he proclaims: "I have not sought in these lines to sketch a method of measuring, in the physical sense of the word, but only a method of classification of individuals. The procedures which I have indicated will, if perfected, come to classify a person before or after such another person or such another series of persons; but I do not believe that one may measure one of the intellectual aptitudes in the sense that one measures length or a capacity." Despising his forewarning, most of the famous IQ test scales claim not only to measure your intelligence but also express it in a normalized number. The inventor of the IQ test believed that intelligence comes with genes but can shine with education, environment and culture, unless you are mentally impaired. He didn’t believe that intelligence is a measurable fixed entity. --User:Sexualharrison13:43, 14 December 2011 (bst)

hey i like the hitler

when he is juggling.--User:Sexualharrison07:26, 10 January 2012 (bst)

I don't think the picture is gone, just the page it was placed on. You could put it somewhere in you userspace if you want to see it kept for any reason. ~ _{14:26, 10 January 2012 (UTC)}

A/RE

Thanks for the questions: replied on the re-evaluation page. ᚱᛁᚹᛖᚾᚨᚾᛏ 01:40, 24 January 2012 (UTC)

not to be a snitch or something

but I thought self updating time stamps were a no no on recruitment ads? see here --User:Sexualharrison13:49, 28 January 2012 (bst)

Yeah they are. I'll remove it and notify the rummers. ~ _{16:09, 28 January 2012 (UTC)}

Deletions

Why did you revert my archive of the January deletions page? Did I do it wrong? Sorry, I'm quite new.--Shortround 13:19, 1 February 2012 (UTC)

You...

...missed something. -- †  talk ? f.u. 13:44, 3 February 2012 (UTC)

Done. -- Spiderzed█ 13:59, 3 February 2012 (UTC)

Thanks. I'm around a lot less frequently these days due to new company policy on game related sites but still check here in the evenings. Might be best to hit a different sysop if something needs immediate attention. ~ _{00:35, 4 February 2012 (UTC)}

i'm so gonna get you back for this.

ha ha dick face!--User:Sexualharrison14:14, 4 February 2012 (bst)

You must have changed the section title like 6 times before you ever saw it. ~ _{16:52, 4 February 2012 (UTC)}

i've been editing from my phone a lot. and I now hate you.. a little.--User:Sexualharrison18:52, 5 February 2012 (bst)

I would edit from my phone more, but using the text input interface to edit a wiki is fuckin' horrible. Might have to try different browsers… what're you using? ᚱᛁᚹᛖᚾᚨᚾᛏ 16:12, 9 February 2012 (UTC)

shitfairi i can't jailbreak my iphone cause than they won't run my lighting control apps.--User:Sexualharrison05:45, 17 February 2012 (bst)

You said impersonation was vandalism

Well [[1]]. On this page User:sexualharrison has done it to me multiple times. He changes my posts, keeping my sig. He is well aware of wiki rules, and has done it multiple times. When he removes his, mine comes down. --Dhavid Grohl 02:52, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

Vandalism reports go on A/VB. If you want to make a report harrison for those comments, please do so there. If you haven't seen it already, that is where the vandalism case was brought against you earlier today. In the future, please use more discretion when dealing with warring like this. Arbitration services are available as well as administrative services such as vandal banning if neccessary. Editing in bad faith is never the right course of action, even if (and especially when) you feel you've been wronged. ~ _{03:33, 14 February 2012 (UTC)}

Done. --Dhavid Grohl 04:07, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

Page for identifying bots

Per this vague discussion, I'm throwing down some random ideas for something like it User:Thegeneralbot/spambotflagging. Feel free to contribute.--The General ^{T Sys U! P! F!} 21:31, 22 March 2012 (UTC)

Tard

Check its fixed? --Ross^lessness 17:55, 13 April 2012 (BST)

Think so. Guess he added something after the reverts but looks like you added it all back. I'm sure he'll try to bring one of us to vb anyway. ~ _{18:06, 13 April 2012 (UTC)}

Oh, and the correct title is "fucktard", apparently. ~ _{18:09, 13 April 2012 (UTC)}

looks like shite no matter what. fitting, really

You're very welcome. I dug hard and deep within my image folders to find something that fulfills all the criterias, yet represents the event page as a whole. -- Spiderzed█ 14:46, 14 April 2012 (BST)

can't we just delete all that shit now that it's the work of a perma banned vandal? well at least it was semi entertaining. not.--User:Sexualharrison15:50, 14 April 2012

my favourite bit will be deleting blitzkrieg and all the others he tried so hard to write. D^ANCED^ANCER^EVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 15:58, 14 April 2012 (BST)

LOL. You mean you had that one saved already? I wonder about you sometimes, Spider. ~ _{16:48, 14 April 2012 (UTC)}

My favorite part will be when I can finally tear my eyes away from the cornhole trainwreck and enjoy my retirememt. ~ _{16:48, 14 April 2012 (UTC)}

It is one of my favourite panels ever seen inside a Marvel comic. Plus, there is no other villain team that could compete with the Nazi Zombies sheer power but The Terrible Two. Which was initially meant to be The Frightful Four. But

1. that name was already taken and
2. to quote The Terrible Two themselves,
   • Rabbit: "We don't need them! We are the Terrible Two! We're evil personified! The vilest villains on the face of the --"
   • Walrus: "They hung up on you, didn't they?"
   • Rabbit: "... After they were done laughing."

Not that #2 has any relation with the Nazi Zombies' desperate search for allies, of course. I'd never imply something as POV as that with my image selection. -- Spiderzed█ 17:42, 14 April 2012 (BST)

Old School

Well, I wasn't too involved with Caiger Mall or the Alliance of Giddings. I was most active between 2007 and late 2008 in the SSZ. I'm revitalizing the project nowdays. I remember events that happened through those areas, I know a lot about the RRF and we also dealt with the Mall Tours and LUE. --Benigno ^{SSZ RCC} 19:22, 15 April 2012 (BST)

i know you--User:Sexualharrison20:52, 15 April 2012

hey fucksucks

just wondering. if add i [[Category:Sexualharrison]] into my sig. will it break the wiki or be against some rule?--User:Sexualharrison20:51, 2 May 2012

yeah that's totally fine dude. You totally won't categorize every page yor sig is on...lol.seriously though, cover you jimmy and slap noinclude tags around that shit and you'll be ok. ~ _{21:49, 2 May 2012 (UTC)}

which are again?--User:Sexualharrison22:02, 2 May 2012

I did it to your signature because I'm awesome.--Shortround }.{ My Contributions 23:20, 2 May 2012 (BST)

They mean that any code you put between the noinclude tags will appear (and apply) to the template page itself but not the pages its included on, so that category won't appear on every page on the wiki D^ANCED^ANCER^EVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 00:38, 3 May 2012 (BST)

well i kinda do want it on every page. is it allowed? --User:Sexualharrison01:25, 7 May 2012

Putting every page that you use your signature on into that category? What do you think? D^ANCED^ANCER^EVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 01:42, 7 May 2012 (BST)

well using logic i learned from corny. yes? :(--User:Sexualharrison01:51, 7 May 2012

Tut. Picking up bad habits from Cornhole? What next? Dry humping the wiki with lopsided battle pages full of hatespeech? ~ _{03:36, 7 May 2012 (UTC)}

I approve of this joke at cornholioos expense, sadly because it is so fucking true >.> god he was retarded D^ANCED^ANCER^EVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 08:53, 8 May 2012 (BST)

You look like spam

I seriously mistook you for a spambot when you created all those pages. lol . XP -- †  talk ? f.u. 05:52, 4 May 2012 (BST)

Uh, thanks, I guess. It was a lot of copy/pasta. Uh, please don't put me on A/VB/B. ~ _{06:05, 4 May 2012 (UTC)}

I keep seeing you post and getting angry about the fact that you aren't dealing with the bots, then remembering that you aren't a sysop any more. ^^ Can't tempt you with the buttons?--Shortround }.{ My Contributions 00:35, 7 May 2012 (BST)

It wouldn't help if you could. Towards the end of my term, I was completely ignoring the spambots. Too time consuming. Although, I did try to help implement some preventative measures before I requested demotion. That line of discussion pretty much died at Karek's talk page. This wiki is seriously lacking in extentions and configuration in my opinion. I'd gladly help contribute to any further discussion on the subject but my days of spambot reporting/blocking have passed. ~ _{03:31, 7 May 2012 (UTC)}

^ More or less this. ᚱᛁᚹᛖᚾᚨᚾᛏ 03:56, 7 May 2012 (BST)

If you guys aren't going to ban the bots can you at least promote me so that I can?--Shortround }.{ My Contributions 12:34, 7 May 2012 (BST)

I'll likely vouch for you again the next time you try out. I'd recommend waiting a bit longer, though. Not because I don't think you're ready, but because bids opened too soon after a previously unsuccessful bid tend to fail. I'd say just continue to do what you're doing, let the sysops work at whatever pace they're comfortable working, be patient and reapply later. ~ _{15:10, 7 May 2012 (UTC)}

I was joking about promotion, I just wanted sysops to do the bots. And I refuse to be patient. NEVER!--Shortround }.{ My Contributions 15:20, 7 May 2012 (BST)

Self Request

Your 5 starts now. --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ ^{#nerftemplatedsigs} 02:07, 24 May 2012 (BST)

15 starts now. --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ ^{#nerftemplatedsigs} 02:39, 24 May 2012 (BST)

So, let's see here… ᚱᛁᚹᛖᚾᚨᚾᛏ 02:55, 24 May 2012 (BST)

Nope. Couldn't edit my talk page during that 15. Wonder if its different for IP blocks. That IP block exemption relies on people being able post to their talk page when blocked. Need to test it before opening it on A/PD. ~ _{02:59, 24 May 2012 (UTC)}

I believe that's either a wiki setting or extension on Wikipedia (I'd need to check, but either way, we like can't change that without Kevan's involvement).
IP blocks default to blocking account creation and anonymous editing (which is already disabled on this wiki). I'd be perfectly happy to list a contact email address in case any administrators of these blocked ranges want to dispute the blocks.
(I'm also thinking about adding them to DNSBLs and possibly emailing the administrators of some of these myself, as their services are being used for vandalism, which will be against their Terms of Service.) ᚱᛁᚹᛖᚾᚨᚾᛏ 03:09, 24 May 2012 (BST)