User talk:Zombiek

Note to all users - posting randomly within another discussion is bad form. Please keep new topic areas separate. --Zombiek 09:05, 27 March 2007 (BST)

Happy days :-)))) --Zombiek 22:09, 3 April 2007 (BST)

	Bigger Mortice
	CHIPPER MEMBER!

Please note that all comments by Dragonhead and their sympathisers are unwelcome here and will be removed. --Zombiek 17:18, 9 April 2007 (BST)

	Troll Begone!
	This user will remove troll posts.

---

Your post on the DEM wiki

I'm not exactly sure what you're talking about in your post on the DEM wiki couldy ou please elaborate a bit. I take it there's a "DEM" member attacking you but you failed to say who was attacking you what group they're in and who was attacked. Let me know and I'll look into the situation.--Kristi of the Dead 03:50, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

Ok after taking a look at a couple of things it appears Claire Sparrow is actually a member of the New Malton Privateers and is not in fact a member of any group in the DEM alliance. I believe I understand the confusion here and I sincerely hope that I can help clear it up. The rogue's gallery is not in any way controlled by the DEM alliance. I as the leader of the DEM have no say in who gets put on the rogue's gallery or who gets taken off. The DEM does use the rogue's gallery to identify pkers (most of us don't bounty hunt at all) so that we'll know which building are safe to sleep in and what not. Again the DEM has no control of the rogue's gallery as it is run seperately with people who are not in the DEM being in charge. I would say your best bet to plead your case would be to go to This Thread over on brainstock and explain the situation to the Rogue's Gallery staff. I am sorry for any confusion and if you have any other questions please feel free to contact me again--Kristi of the Dead 13:42, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

Can you not read english

Please resist how ever hard it may be by keeping your opinions to yourself on your own pages, they are not welcome on ours. Maybe I should just be as annoying as yourself and as your message above says, my comments are unwelcome and will be removed, that I in turn keep posting worthless shit every time you delete this post.Grow up you childish little plebHomuncubish 20:45, 27 August 2007 (BST)

Nah, I think I'll leave the above message on - shows everyone exactly what you're like. --Zombiek 20:47, 27 August 2007 (BST)

Ahh, you even came back and edited them. --Zombiek 21:02, 27 August 2007 (BST)

---

Previous posts on user talk page:

Please do not vandalise this wiki. Continuing this behaviour may lead to your editing privileges being revoked. -- boxy ^{T L ZS Nuts2U DA} 13:08, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

The above is the result of consistent griefing, abuse and pking of myself and other members of The Zog of Marrinium by Dragonhead members. Had they simply asked me politely to cease and desist I would have done, instead they have chosen to complain. I am extremely concerned about the misogynistic attitudes of some of the members of Dragonhead, as it makes for an uncomfortable playing environment for women players. In addition, their aggressive tactics when faced with any group that disagrees with them is tantamount to provocation and even bullying.

I have been playing UD for well over a year, and once in a while had a tussle with a player or group, but it's always been understood by all parties to simply be part of the game. It's a shame that Dragonhead have chosen to ruin that light-hearted tongue in cheek bickering and create an unpleasant atmosphere in this way.

It's not Dragonhead's game, it's everyone's game (well, technically, it's Kevan's game, lol). --Zombiek 14:33, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

---

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalise, you will be blocked from editing this wiki.--Gage 22:48, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

Why am I being given a final warning? I was warned earlier, that was enough. It will not happen again. --Zombiek 23:22, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

Regard to the LMS killing

Understood, I've sent them a message and a mobile message to sort it out. I am very sorry about this, rest assured it won't happen again. Acoustic Pie 22:20, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

Mokeman would be me. The reason why I said for him not to think about Pking an Infection was because I was under the assumption that he would Pk him as an act of retribution. Given what happened after an infection killed a scarab beetle with the radio broadcasts, labelling him as a P/G/Rker and as a zerger and the countless amounts of graffiti (which is still up) labelling him as a Pker and to KOS seemed extremely harsh even when he provided evidence for his actions. So you are aware your group is actually on Zerg Liste here and here. Something which was said was put up by dragonhead as a way of getting back at you. These lists were ones which an infection acted on. A scarab beetle also said that Dragonhead zerg, if you can provide evidence of a similar vein I will drop this whole deal. If you're wondering why I got involved with the dispute in the first place, it was because I wanted to stop the Pking in the mall. You are already aware that Dragonhead aren't commiting to the mall Pk policy, so I'm afraid that because of this I suggested that it ends. Also if you're wondering why I am getting a little frustrated with your group, have a look here at the 3:41PM broadcasts and this message from Jamjar Wasp Trap. Also I'm afraid that your Mall Policy must be revoked. Quite simply because of this.

Still, I wasn't 'baiting' your group. They were on zerg liste, if anything I was warning them of the possibility that they would be hunted down by various Zerg Hunters. Not baiting them. If anything a scarab beetle was provoking everything by broadcasting all the messages on the radio. As a group we work on evidence. So all I ask from you, is evidence that you do not zerg in the area of Lumber Mall, evidence that Dragonhead do (which A scarab beetle said they did) zerg and evidence of me 'baiting' your members. The last thing I want is a war with your group, If you have read your group's talk page you'll know that I am giving up trying to resolve the trouble between the two groups. I was going to let it be. But the masses of propoganda, the zerg accusations and the Pking just don't add up. If you want me (and the group) to remain impartial, then you'd damn well better be impartial towards us too. So instead of spraying propoganda everywhere and spamming the radio, talk it out. Acoustic Pie 19:28, 26 April 2008 (BST)

Mokeman defended an infection for pking a scarab beetle (twice) in Lumber Mall. Why? --Zombiek 19:48, 26 April 2008 (BST)

This is because they provided evidence that a scarab beetle is part of a zerging group, something which went unchallenged by members of your group (even when he killed your hand). So if you can give me evidence that goes against this, then please do. It's the only way you can clear your name. Also, what say you in relevance to the screenshot of me being Pked by one of your members, and can you give evidence of me defending him the first time please? Acoustic Pie 19:55, 26 April 2008 (BST)

Okay, so let's see. You actively Pked me because I tried to tell you that you, you, were on Zerg Liste and all the zerg Hunters know you're in the mall? Also because I came across as threatening!? Now hold the phone there. How exactly was I threatening. I was advising you (as I believe a scarab beetle is one of your characters, no?) to stay out of the mall because you would be Pked by zerg Hunters and you threw it back in my face by Pking me? Seriously you guys, uncool. You wouldn't take any of my advice when I gave it to you. I tried to keep it low key by advising you to take it to somewhere like here to do the talking. As for wrongdoing, let me see. If you are on Zerg Liste and haven't given any inclination that you don't zerg at all, then what do you expect to happen? If you don't say you don't zerg after being accused of zerging, it can only be assumed that you do. Hence I can't control what other people do. I asked an infection for evidence earlier on today and advised him against getting involved with you because he would end up dead! And look what happened. I have a screenshot that an infection was killed yesterday by someone because of your actions. So that means that you are 2+ against the mall policy which you profess you want so much. 1, against me when all I wanted to do was to help, even though you didn't listen to me and 1 against an infection even though he didn't actually say anything against you or Pk you today (if he did then give me some evidence). So you have no justification in his kill, and hardly justification in mine. I can understand that you were respecting the mall policy by not Pking Dragonhead in the mall, but surely you must have realised that when they were slaughtering you in the mall, it was hardly fair at all? Also I respect the mall policy because I suggested it in the first place! Did I Pk/heal any of your members, no? Who jumped the gun first and went on a verbal assault over the radio against me? You guys did. Thus it would be you that broke the mall policy first. An infection's kill was totally justified and because he has the evidence (which still has gone unchallenged with adequate evidence from you guys) he has the right to do it again. So until you provide evidence for:

1. you not zerging in the area of Lumber Mall
2. Dragonhead (which A scarab beetle said they did) zerging
3. me 'baiting' your members

consider the mall policy out of the window. LMS will still remain impartial to either group (as an infection isn't in dragonhead he is out of the impartial aspect) until these are reached. Once they are all filled then the mall policy will be reconsidered. Still, I'd like to hear why you deemed an infection had to be killed and what you have to say about what I have just put above. Acoustic Pie 20:25, 26 April 2008 (BST)

Also you may want to have a look at this. It is from a 3rd party (not affiliated with LMS) in the mall, and I don't mean to sound rude but it seems very suspicious that the murders were in such quick succession of each other. it is very, very Petty of you to do this against an infection when they had a completely justified kill (one which you still haven't given evidence against). So if you want to be compliant in the mall, then I suggest you start to read the messages on those tinyurl links. As otherwise you may have a lot of zerg hunters on your back, very very fast. This is not, in any way a threat to you, but if someone in the mall were to pass on the fact that you regularly sleep in there, well, there would be a field day for Zerg Hunters in the area. So my advice to you all, is to not kill an infection again, until you can provide evidence against his claims. He can be revived/healed by LMS because he is infact not DH, and thus not in the impartial aspect. Please do remember the above 3 pieces of evidence we would like to see from your group. And remember, if zerg hunters find out about you sleeping in the mall, do not blame us, because you havem't provided evidence against it. Acoustic Pie 20:51, 26 April 2008 (BST)

I suggest you read this message as it explains our non violent approach to your group which Mokeman and LMS are adopting. Acoustic Pie 20:04, 28 April 2008 (BST)

The Wondrous Eye of Hulda

Your page was unlinked, so I linked it here.--Yonnua Koponen ^{Talk ! Contribs} 19:03, 27 January 2010 (UTC)