Talk:Empty Blocks

From The Urban Dead Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search

Carpark

The image for carparks is misleading. A carpark is not necessarily a building, rather it is just the Australian and UK term for parking lot. The in game description has no indication that it might be a multi-story carpark. Parking Lot entry in Wikipedia --FrozenFlame 22:50, 31 March 2008 (BST)

wasteland [65, 40]

is this a Revival point? I'm standing here - someone please save me ...! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Wally Butler (talkcontribs) at an unknown time.

Looks like it according to the suburb page. You may want to put a request in on the DEM request page, lots of people check it -- boxy T L ZS Nuts2U DA 12:09, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
Please sign your edits on the wiki. You can do this either by typing ~~~~ (four tildes), or by pressing the Sign.png button in the editing toolbar. Signing your edits in the standard format makes it much easier to identify when and who has made changes, and creates less work for sysops and other wiki users. -- boxy T L ZS Nuts2U DA 12:12, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

Parks

Parks have pistol clips - [1] JD 04:00, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

Noticed that. There are shotgun shells in the junk yards too..--Airborne88Zzz1.JPGT|ZC|MI|E! 01:21, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
I tried to search for Pumpkins for Halloween 2009 in the park. But during my 38 searches, I found a Flare Gun, a newspaper, and a pistol clip instead. -- Kittithaj 20:37, 1 November 2009 (UTC)

Exercise yard/Training grounds

There are entries for both of these, and they're suspiciously similar- i.e. inside of a fort. I'm guessing they're two names for the same thing... Merge? Nursebootsy 01:35, 11 March 2010 (UTC)

They're actually two unique blocks inside a fort (at least, as unique as a pair of empty blocks can get). Considering their rarity and significance (being part of a fort) it would be best to keep them seperate entries on the page.--~ Red Hawk One Talk | space for lease 02:21, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
They have the same applications but for clarities sake we wouldn't merge them. -- 02:28, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
Ah. And *that's* why I asked, rather than merged. Thanks guys! Nursebootsy 02:59, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
No probs! -- 03:45, 11 March 2010 (UTC)