UDWiki:Administration/Arbitration/Amazing vs Rasher

Administration Services — Protection. This page has been protected against editing. See the archive of recent actions or the Protections log.

Ruling

I would like to confirm that if Amazing does indeed put the gold in the basket I will stop killing his guildmates on a daily basis. It puts the gold in the basket or it gets the hose again Rasher 22:17, 19 April 2006 (BST)

Proof of Rasher's willful refusal to stop harassment on the Wiki. -- Amazing 03:06, 20 April 2006 (BST)

You do not understand the meaning of "proof" at all, in any shape or form. Rasher 04:59, 20 April 2006 (BST)

	Gold in the Basket Supporter
	This user or group believes that if Amazing does in fact put the gold in the basket that this situation can be resolved.

Arbiters

	Gold in the Basket Supporter
	This user or group believes that if Amazing does in fact put the gold in the basket that this situation can be resolved.

I would like Lucero Capell to arbitrate. Rasher 06:16, 20 April 2006 (BST)

I would be willing to arbitrate, if Amazing accepts. --Lucero Capell 15:58, 20 April 2006 (BST)

I would be willing to arbitrate, if Both Parties accepts. Conndraka 04:06, 21 April 2006 (BST)

I would be willing to arbitrate, if both parties accept. --Cyberbob240^{CDF | Arb | W!} 06:37, 22 April 2006 (BST)

I would be willing to arbitrate if both parties accept. --LibrarianBrent 04:20, 21 April 2006 (BST)

Ignoring the troll, I'd accept Conndraka or Brent. Conn's been supportive of me and I guess he'd probably be clear-headed enough, Brent's fair enough that I either come out on his bad or good side depending on the ACTUAL FACTS from my experience. -- Amazing 02:55, 22 April 2006 (BST)

By actual facts you mean ignorant, irrational support of you regardless of truth? Rasher 06:30, 22 April 2006 (BST)

Aw, don't insult a Moderator! It's so wrong. ;) -- Amazing 06:35, 22 April 2006 (BST)

I deny Conndraka and brent. Rasher 06:46, 22 April 2006 (BST)

But what about me? You must have heard of my reform. I'd be totally unbiased. --Cyberbob240^{CDF | Arb | W!} 06:59, 22 April 2006 (BST)

Denied Rasher 17:57, 22 April 2006 (BST)

I would be willing to arbitrate, if both parties accept. Scinfaxi 20:07, 23 April 2006 (BST)

I accept. I have never had contact with Scinfaxi in game or on the wiki and I feel that he would be an unbiased moderator. He also makes great beef stew. Rasher 22:39, 23 April 2006 (BST)

Scinfaxi is involved in the greater case and is a troll with tremendous bias and no sense of morality. Evidence on this page alone supports this. Denied for obvious reasons. -- Amazing 23:44, 23 April 2006 (BST)

I deny your denial. Scinfaxi, how do you rule? Let me count the ways... Rasher 01:12, 24 April 2006 (BST)

I beleive I could rule on this case a fair and imapartial manner. Amazing is now forever banned from the wiki. May God have mercy on his soul.Scinfaxi 07:40, 26 April 2006 (BST)

Ruling accepted. The gold is

	Gold in the Basket Supporter
	This user or group believes that if Amazing does in fact put the gold in the basket that this situation can be resolved.

ok! Rasher 19:57, 26 April 2006 (BST)

I would be willing to arbitrate if both parties accept. I have not had contact with either of the parties involved, and will try to be fair to the best of my ability. --V2Blast 20:31, 1 May 2006 (BST)

Denied. Rasher 23:20, 1 May 2006 (BST)

Two questions (the same two I asked in Amazing v. GANKBUS): What's going on with this case? And why is the entire GANKBUS page on here (as a template)? --V2Blast 21:52, 8 May 2006 (BST)

GANKBUS http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php/GANKBUS

Final Ruling

1. Amazing is not to Comment on any page where Rasher can be considered an invested party (i.e. Rasher's User page, or any group of which Rasher maintains an active membership in wether he has posted recently on that page or not).
2. Rasher is not to comment on any page where Amazing is considered an invested party(i.e. Amazing's User page, or any group of which Amazing maintains an active membership in wether he has posted recently on that page or not).
3. Neiter Amazing nor Rasher are to comment directly to or about each other on any page that is considered "Community Property" such as discussion pages or sugestion pages.
4. Templates, or Pages (Other than personal talk pages)created by either party that exists (or may be perceived by a mod) as existing exclusivly to antagonize the other party shall not be created by either party.
5. Failure to Comply will be considered vandalism, and is to be reported to a Mod for removal.